Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T00:59:16.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO THE NEARCTIC ORTHOCLADIINAE (DIPTERA: CHIRONOMIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. S. Cranston
Affiliation:
British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, England
D. R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Centre, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada KIA OC6

Abstract

Five new species, Apometriocnemus beringensis, Cricotopus (Cricotopus) bifurcatus, Doithrix dillonae, Hydrobaenus piloculus, and Paratrissocladius lawrencensis, are described. The following new combinations are established: Bryophaenocladius astis (Roback 1951b); Compterosmittia nerius (Curran 1930); Parakiefferiella subaterrima (Malloch 1915); Paratrichocladius nitidus (Malloch 1915); Pseudosmittia nanseni (Kieffer 1926); and Zalutschia sivertseni (Aagard 1979). New genus name synonymies are Maricladius Sublette, 1970 with Parakiefferiella Thienemann, 1936; and Prosmittia Brundin, 1956 with Pseudosmittia Goetghebuer, 1932. New species name synonymies are Spaniotoma (Trichocladius) senex Johannsen, 1937 with Trichocladius nitidellus Malloch, 1915 (= Acricotopus nitidellus); Hydrobaenus traenis Roback, 1957b with Hydrobaenus astis Roback, 1957b (= Bryophaenocladius astis); Compterosmittia clavigera Saether, 1982 with Camptocladius nerius Curran, 1930 (= Compterosmittia nerius); Cricotopus flannagani Saether, 1971 with Cricotopus macraei Saether, 1971; Gymnometriocnemus marionensis Saether, 1969 with Metriocnemus subnudus Edwards, 1929 (= Gymnometriocnemus (Gymnometriocnemus) subnudus); Gymnometriocnemus (Raphidocladius) acigus Saether, 1983 with Metriocnemus brumalis Edwards, 1929 (= Gymnometriocnemus (Raphidocladius) brumalis); Limnophyes spatulosus Saether, 1975 with Limnophyes borealis Goetghebuer, 1933; Limnophyes cristatissimus Saether, 1975 with Camptocladius fumosus Johannsen, 1905 (= Limnophyes fumosus); Limnophyes hudsoni Saether, 1975 with Limnophyes immucronatus Saether, 1969; Hydrobaenus hudsoni Saether, 1977 with Chaetocladius (Parachaetocladius) abnobaeus Wülker, 1959 (= Parachaetocladius abnobaeus); Parakiefferiella torulata Saether, 1969 with Camptocladius subaterrimus Malloch, 1915 (= Parakiefferiella subaterrima); Trichocladius helis Roback, 1957b with Orthocladius nitidus Malloch, 1915 (= Paratrichocladius nitidus); Syncricotopus fontinalis Saether, 1969 with Chironomus rufiventris Meigen, 1830 (= Paratrichocladius rufiventris); Pseudorthocladius (Lordella) comans Saether and Sublette, 1983 with Pseudorthocladius (Lordella) wingoi Saether and Sublette, 1983; Smittia triappendiculata Goetghebuer, 1931 with Camptocladius forcipatus Goetghebuer, 1921 (= Pseudosmittia forcipatus); and Psilometriocnemus cristatus Saether, 1982 with Psilometriocnemus triannulatus Saether, 1969. Major new distribution records are given for 49 species including 8 Nearctic and 32 Canadian. A key to adult males of Nearctic Limnophyes is given.

Résumé

Les auteurs décrivent cinq nouvelles espèces, Apometriocnemus beringensis, Cricotopus (Cricotopus) bifurcatus, Doithrix dillonae, Hydrobaenus piloculus et Paratrissocladius lawrencensis. Les nouvelles combinaisons suivantes ont été établies : Bryophaenocladius astis (Roback 1957b); Compterosmittia nerius (Curran 1930); Parakiefferiella subaterrima (Malloch 1915); Paratrichocladius nitidus (Malloch 1915); Pseudosmittia nanseni (Kieffer 1926); et Zalutschia sivertseni (Aagard 1979). Les nouvelles synonymies de noms de genres sont Maricladius Sublette, 1970 et Parakiefferiella Thienemann, 1936; Prosmittia Brundin, 1956 et Pseudosmittia Goetghebuer, 1932. Les nouvelles synonymies de noms d’espèces sont Spaniotoma (Trichocladius) senex Johannsen, 1937 et Trichocladius nitidellus Malloch, 1915 (= Acricotopus nitidellus); Hydrobaenus traenis Roback, 1951b et Hydrobaenus astis Roback, 1957b (= Bryophaenocladius astis); Compterosmittia clavigera Saether, 1982 et Camptocladius nerius Curran, 1930 (= Compterosmittia nerius); Cricotopus flannagani Saether, 1971 et Cricotopus macraei Saether, 1971; Gymnometriocnemus marionensis Saether, 1969 et Metriocnemus subnudus Edwards, 1929 (= Gymnometriocnemus (Gymnometriocnemus) subnudus); Gymnometriocnemus (Raphidocladius) acigus Saether, 1983 et Metriocnemus brumalis Edwards, 1929 (= Gymnometriocnemus (Raphidocladius) brumalis); Limnophyes spatulosus Saether, 1975 et Limnophyes borealis Goetghebuer 1933; Limnophyes cristatissimus Saether, 1975 et Camptocladius fumosus Johannsen, 1905 (= Limnophyes fumosus); Limnophyes hudsoni Saether, 1975 et Limnophyes immucronatus Saether, 1969; Hydrobaenus hudsoni Saether, 1977 et Chaetocladius (Parachaetocladius) abnobaeus Wülker, 1959 (= Parachaetocladius abnobaeus); Parakiefferiella torulata Saether, 1969 et Camptocladius subaterrimus Malloch, 1915 (= Parakiefferiella subaterrima);Trichocladius helis Roback, 1957b et Orthocladius nitidus Malloch, 1915 (= Paratrichocladius nitidus); Syncricotopus fontinalis Saether, 1969 et Chironomus rufiventris Meigen, 1830 (= Paratrichocladius rufiventris); Pseudorthocladius (Lordella) comans Saether et Sublette, 1983 et Pseudorthocladius (Lordella) wingoi Saether et Sublette 1983; Smittia triappendiculata Goetghebuer, 1931 et Camptocladius forcipatus Goetghebuer, 1921 (= Pseudosmittia forcipatus); et Psilometriocnemus cristatus Saether, 1982 et Psilometriocnemus triannulatus Saether, 1969. Les auteurs donnent de nouveaux registres, d’une grande importance, de la distribution de 49 espdces dont 8 néarctiques et 32 canadiennes. Ils présentent aussi une clé des adultes mâles de Limnophyes néuctiques.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aagard, K. 1979. Eukiefferiella sivertseni n.sp. from Norway (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ent. scand. Suppl. 10: 9597.Google Scholar
Ashe, P., and Murray, D.A.. 1980. Nostococladius, a new subgenus of Cricotopus (Diptera: Chironomidae). pp. 105–111 in Murray, D.A. (Ed.), Chironomidae. Ecology, Systematics, Cytology and Physiology. Pergamon Press, Oxford. 354 pp.Google Scholar
Boerger, H.J., Clifford, H.F., and Davies, R.W.. 1982. Density and microdistribution of chironomid larvae in an Alberta brown-water stream. Can. J. Zool. 60: 913920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boesel, M.W. 1983. A review of the genus Cricotopus in Ohio, with a key to adults of species of the northeastern United States (Diptera, Chironomidae). Ohio J. Sci. 83: 7490.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1947. Zur Kenntnis der schwedischen Chironomiden. Ark. Zool. 39A: 195.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1949. Chironomiden und andere Bodentiere der südschwedischen Gebirgsseen. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der bodenfaunistischen Charakterzüge schwedischer oligotropher Seen. Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res., Drottningholm 30: 1915.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1956. Zur Systematik der Orthocladiinae (Dipt., Chironomidae). Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res., Drottningholm 37: 5185.Google Scholar
Caldwell, B.A. 1984. Two new species and record of other chironomids from Georgia (Diptera: Chironomidae) with some observations on ecology. Georgia J. Sci. 42: 8196.Google Scholar
Cannings, R.A., and Scudder, G.G.E.. 1978. The littoral Chironomidae (Diptera) of saline lakes in central British Columbia. Can. J. Zool. 56: 11441155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspers, N., and Siebert, M.. 1980. Pseudorthocladius rectangilobus sp. n., eine neue Chironomide aus dem Hunsrück (Deutschland) (Diptera, Chironomidae). Mitt. schweiz. ent. Ges. 53: 181183.Google Scholar
Coffman, W.P., Cranston, P.S., Oliver, D.R., and Saether, O.A.. 1986. 9. The pupae of Orthocladiinae (Diptera: Chironominae) of the Holarctic region—Keys and diagnoses. pp. 147–296 in Wiederholm, T. (Ed.), Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region. Keys and Diagnoses. Part 2.—Pupae. Ent. scand. Suppl. 28. 482 pp.Google Scholar
Cranston, P.S., and Saether, O.A.. 1986. Rheosmittia (Diptera: Chironomidae): a generic validation and revision of the western Palaearctic species. J. Nat. Hist. 20: 3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, C.H. 1930. Report on the Diptera collected at the station for the study of insects, Harriman Interstate Park, N.Y. Bull. Am. Mus. nat. Hist. 61: 21115.Google Scholar
Dendy, J.S., and Sublette, J.E.. 1959. The Chironomidae (= Tendipedidae: Diptera) of Alabama with descriptions of six new species. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 52: 506519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driver, E.A. 1977. Chironomid communities in small prairie ponds: some characteristics and controls. Freshwat. Biol. 7: 121133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F.W. 1922. Results of the Oxford University Expedition to Spitsbergen, 1921.—No. 14. Diptera Nematocera. Annu. Mag. nat. Hist. (9)10: 193215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F.W. 1924. Some British species of Corynoneura (Diptera-Chironomidae). Ent. mon. Mag. 60: 182189.Google Scholar
Edwards, F.W. 1929. British non-biting midges (Diptera, Chironomidae). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 77: 279430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, F.W. 1932. Recent literature. Faune de France: 23; Diptères: Chironomidae, IV. Par M. Goetghebuer. Entomologist 65: 140141.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1921. Chironomides de Belgique et spécialement de la zone des Flandres. Mém. Mus. r. Hist. nat. Belg. 8: 1211.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1931. Ceratopogonidae et Chironomidae nouveaux d'Europe. Bull. Ann. Soc. Ent. Belg. 71: 211218.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1932. Diptères Chironomidae IV. (Orthocladiinae, Corynoneurinae, Clunioninae, Diamesinae). Faune Fr. 23: 1204.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. 1933. Chironomides du Groenland oriental, du Svalbard et de la Terre de François Joseph. Skr. Svalbard Ishavet 53: 1931.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M., and Lenz, F.. 1944. Tendipedidae—Orthocladiinae (Chironomidae—Orthocladiinae). [part]. Fliegen palaearkt. Reg. 13g: 113144.Google Scholar
Hirvenoja, M. 1967. 7. Chironomidae and Culicidae (Dipt.) from Spitsbergen. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 33: 5261.Google Scholar
Hirvenoja, M. 1973. Revision der Gattung Cricotopus van der Wulp and ihrer Verwandten (Diptera, Chironomidae). Ann. zool. fenn. 10: 1363.Google Scholar
Holmgren, A.E. 1869. Bidrag till Kannedomen om Beeren Eilands och Spetsbergens Insekt-Fauna. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 8(5): 156.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O.A. 1903. Aquatic Nematocerous Diptera. N.Y. St. Mus. Annu. Rep. (1902) 63: 328441.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O.A. 1905. Aquatic Nematocerous Diptera II. Chironomidae. pp. 76–331 in Needham, J.C., Morton, K.J., and Johannsen, O.A. (Eds.), May Flies and Midges of New York. Bull. N.Y. St. Mus. 86.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O.A. 1937. Aquatic Diptera. III. Chironomidae: Subfamilies Tanypodinae, Diamesinae and Orthocladiinae. Mem. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn 205: 184.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1922. Chironomides de la nouvelle-Zemble. Rep. scient. Results Norw. Exped. Nova Zemlya 1921 2: 124.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J.J. 1926. Chironomiden der 2. Fram-Expedition (1898–1902). Norsk. ent. Tidsskr. 2: 7889.Google Scholar
Langton, P.H. 1984. A key to pupal exuviae of British Chironomidae. Privately published by the author. 324 pp.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1758. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum caracteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Ed. 10. 1, 824 pp. Holmiae (= Stockholm).Google Scholar
Malloch, J.R. 1915. The Chironomidae, or midges of Illinois, with particular reference to the species occurring in the Illinois river. Bull. Ill. St. Lab. nat. Hist. 10: 275543.Google Scholar
Mason, P.G., and Lehmkuhl, D.M.. 1983. Effects of the Squaw Rapids hydroelectric development on Saskatchewan River Chrionomidae (Diptera). Mem. Am. ent. Soc. 34: 187210.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1830. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten. 6: 1401. Schulz, Hamm.Google Scholar
Oliver, D.R. 1962. A review of the subfamily Orthocladiinae (Chironomidae, Diptera) of Bear Island. Astarte 20: 119.Google Scholar
Oliver, D.R. 1963. Entomological studies in the Lake Hazen area, Ellesmere Island, including lists of species of Arachnida, Collembola, and Insecta. Arctic 16: 175180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinder, L.C.V. 1978. A key to adult males of the British Chironomidae (Diptera), the non-biting midges. Freshwat. Biol. Assoc. Sci. Publ. 37: 1169.Google Scholar
Roback, S.S. 1957 a. The immature tendipedids of the Philadelphia area (Diptera: Tendipedidae). Monogr. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 9: 1152.Google Scholar
Roback, S.S. 1957 b. Some Tendipedidae from Utah. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 109: 124.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1969. Some Nearctic Podonominae, Diamesinae, and Orthocladiinae (Diptera: Chironomidae). Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 170: 1154.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1971. Four new and unusual Chironomidae (Diptera). Can. Ent. 103: 17991827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1975. Twelve new species of Limnophyes Eaton, with keys to Nearctic males of the genus (Diptera: Chironomidae). Can. Ent. 107: 10291056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1976. Revision of Hydrobaenus, Trissocladius, Zalutschia, Paratrissocladius, and some related genera (Diptera: Chironomidae). Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 195: 1287.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1977. Habrobaenus hudsoni n.gen., n.sp. and the immatures of Baeoctenus bicolor Saether (Diptera: Chironomidae). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 34: 23542361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1980. Glossary of chironomid morphology terminology (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ent. scand. Suppl. 14: 151.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1981. Orthocladiinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from the British West Indies, with descriptions of Antillocladius n.gen., Lipurometriocnemus n.gen., Compterosmittia n.gen. and Diplosmittia n.gen. Ent. scand. Suppl. 16: 146.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1982. Orthocladiinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from SE U.S.A., with descriptions of Plhudsonia, Unniella and Platysmittia n. genera and Atelopodella n.subgen. Ent. scand. 13: 465510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1983. A review of Holarctic Gymnometriocnemus Goetghebuer, 1932, with the description of Raphidocladius subgen. n. and Sublettiella gen. n. (Diptera: Chironomidae). Aquat. Insect. 5: 209226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, O.A. 1985. Apometriocnemus fontinalis gen. n., sp. n. (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Tennessee, U.S.A. Ent. scand. 15: 536539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, O.A., and Halvorsen, G.A.. 1981. Diagnoses of Tvetenia Kieff. emend., Dratnalia n. gen., and Eukiefferiella Thien. emend., with a phylogeny of the Cardiocladius group (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ent. scand. Suppl. 15: 269285.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A., and Sublette, J.E.. 1983. A review of the genera Doithrix n.gen., Georthocladius Strenzke, Parachaetocladius Wülker, and Pseudorthocladius Goetghebuer (Diptera: Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae). Ent. scand. Suppl. 20: 1100.Google Scholar
Saether, O.A., Sublette, J.E., and Willassen, E.. 1984. Chironomidae (Diptera) from the 2nd Fram Expedition (1898–1902) to Arctic North America described by J.J. Kieffer. Ent. scand. 15: 249275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlee, D. 1968. Vergleichende Merkmalsanalyse zur Morphologie und Phylogenie der Corynoneura-Gruppe (Diptera, Chironomidae). Zugleich eine allgemeine Morphologie der Chironomiden-Imago (♂). Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk. 180: 1150.Google Scholar
Singh, M.P., and Harrison, A.D.. 1984. The chironomid community (Diptera: Chironomidae) in a southern Ontario stream and the annual emergence patterns of common species. Arch. Hydrobiol. 99: 221253.Google Scholar
Strenzke, K. 1950. Systematik, Morphologie und Ökologie der terrestrischen Chironomiden. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 18: 207444.Google Scholar
Sublette, J.E. 1964. Chironomidae (Diptera) of Louisiana. I. Systematics and immature stages of some lentic chironomids of west-central Louisiana. Tulane Stud. Zool. 11: 109150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sublette, J.E. 1967. Type specimens of Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Cornell University Collection. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 40: 477564.Google Scholar
Sublette, J.E. 1970. Type specimens of Chironomidae (Diptera) in the Illinois Natural History Survey Collection, Urbana. J. Kans. ent. Soc. 43: 4495.Google Scholar
Sublette, J.E., and Sublette, M.S.. 1965. Family Chironomidae (Tendipedidae). pp. 142–181 in Stone, A. et al. , (Ed.), A Catalogue of Diptera of America North of Mexico. U.S. Dept. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv. Handb. 276.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. 1921. Die Metamorphose der Chironomidengattungen Camptocladius, Dyscamptocladius und Phaenocladius, mit Bemerkungen über die Artdifferenzierung bei den Chironomiden überhaupt. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 2: 809850.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. 1936. Alpine Chironomiden (Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen in der Gegend von Garmisch-Parten-kirchen, Oberbayern). Arch. Hydrobiol. 30: 167262.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. 1936. Japanese Cricotopus and Corynoneura species (Diptera: Chironomidae). Tenthedro 1: 952.Google Scholar
Tuiskunen, J. 1985. A description of Psilometriocnemus europaeus sp. n. and Doncricotopus dentatus sp. n. (Diptera, Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae) from Finland. Ann. Ent. Fenn. 51: 101104.Google Scholar
Tuiskunen, J., and Lindeberg, B.. 1986. Chironomidae (Diptera) from Fennoscandia north of 68°N, with a description of new species and two new genera. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 23: 361393.Google Scholar
Webb, D.W. 1969. New species of chironomids from Costello Lake, Ontario (Diptera: Chironomidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 42: 91108.Google Scholar
Wiederholm, T. (Ed.). 1983. Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae. Ent. scand. Suppl. 19: 1457.Google Scholar
Winn, A.F., and Beaulieu, G.. 1915. A preliminary list of the insects of the province of Quebec. Part. II, Diptera. Chironomidae. 7th Rep. Que. Soc. Protect. Plants, Suppl.: 116117.Google Scholar
Wirth, W.W. 1957. The species of Cricotopus midges living in the blue-green alga Nostoc in California (Diptera: Tendipendidae). Pan-Pac. Ent. 33: 121126.Google Scholar
Wülker, W. 1959. Drei neue Chironomiden-Arten (Dipt.) und ihre Bedeutung fur das Konvergenzproblem bei Imagines und Puppen. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 25: 4464.Google Scholar