Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:54:20.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFICACY OF BACILLUS SPHAERICUS STRAIN 1593 AGAINST THE FOUR INSTARS OF LABORATORY REARED AND FIELD COLLECTED CULEX PIPIENS PIPIENS AND LABORATORY REARED CULEX SALINARIUS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Stephen P. Wraight
Affiliation:
Biological Survey, New York State Museum, The State Education Department, Cultural Education Center, Albany, New York 12230
Daniel Molloy
Affiliation:
Biological Survey, New York State Museum, The State Education Department, Cultural Education Center, Albany, New York 12230
Hugo Jamnback
Affiliation:
Biological Survey, New York State Museum, The State Education Department, Cultural Education Center, Albany, New York 12230

Abstract

Culex pipiens pipiens and C. salinarius were found equally susceptible in laboratory tests to Bacillus sphaericus strain 1593 with LC50 values for the four instars ranging between 20 and 137 ppb (approximately 820 and 5600 spores/ml). Tests against field collected C. p. pipiens larvae revealed a regularly decreasing susceptibility with increasing larval age, the first instars being between 2 and 5 times more susceptible than fourth instars. In contrast, no significant differences in the susceptibility of second, third, and fourth instars were found in tests of laboratory reared larvae.

Résumé

Lors d’essais de laboratoires Culex pipiens pipiens et C. salinarius se sont montrés également susceptibles au Bacillus sphaericus souche 1593, les valeurs de la CL50 pour les 4 stades se situant entre 20 et 137 ppb (environ 820 et 5600 spores/ml). Des essais sur des larves de C. p. pipiens provenant du terrain ont révélé une susceptibilité décroissant régulièrement d’un stade au suivant, les premiers stades étant de 2 à 5 fois plus susceptibles que les quatrièmes stades. Cependant aucune différence significative de susceptibilité n’a été observée pour les stades deux, trois et quatre, chez des larves élevées en laboratoire.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bliss, C. I. 1935. The calculation of the dosage-mortality curve. Ann. appl. Biol. 22: 134167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. W., Singer, S., and Briggs, J. D.. 1975. Pathogenesis of Bacillus sphaericus strain SSII-1 infections in Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus (= Culex pipiens fatigans) larvae. J. invert. Path. 25: 179184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Finney, D. J. 1971. Probit Analysis. 3rd ed. Cambridge Univ. Press, London/New York.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. J., Ford, I., and Singer, S.. 1974. Bacillus sphaericus var. fusiformis as a potential pathogen against Culex tarsalis and Culex pipiens. Calif. Mosquito Control Ass. Proc. 42: 8182.Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. J. and Margalit, J.. 1977. A bacterial spore demonstrating rapid larvicidal activity against Anopheles sergentii, Uranotaenia unguiculata, Culex univittatus, Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens. Mosquito News 37: 355358.Google Scholar
Mulligan, F. S. III, Schaefer, C. H., and Miura, T.. 1978. Laboratory and field evaluation of Bacillus sphaericus as a mosquito control agent. J. econ. Ent. 71: 774777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramoska, W. A., Burgess, J., and Singer, S.. 1978. Field application of a bacterial insecticide. Mosquito News 38: 5760.Google Scholar
Ramoska, W. A., Singer, S., and Levy, R.. 1977. Bioassay of three strains of Bacillus sphaericus on field-collected mosquito larvae. J. invert. Path. 30: 151154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, S. 1973. Insecticidal activity of recent bacterial isolates and their toxins against mosquito larvae. Nature, Lond. 244: 110111.Google Scholar
Singer, S. 1977. Isolation and development of bacterial pathogens of vectors. In Briggs, J. D., Ed., Biological regulation of vectors: Proceedings, National Institutes of Health Workshop; 1975 October 6–8; Easton, Maryland. DHEW Publ. (NIH) 77-1180, pp. 314.Google Scholar