Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:06:38.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFICIENCY OF SUCROSE FLOTATION IN RECOVERING INSECT LARVAE FROM BENTHIC STREAM SAMPLES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Wayne M. Pask  and
Robert R. Costa
Wayne M. Pask
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Brockport
Robert R. Costa
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Brockport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Duplicate benthic stream samples were collected from three sites on Sandy Creek (Lake Ontario Watershed) in Western New York, 8 and 22 September, 1970. Samples taken on 8 September were preserved in 10% formalin. Samples taken on 22 September were not preserved. Insect specimens were removed from both sets of samples by flotation with a sucrose solution of 1.12 sp. gr. Preserved and unpreserved samples were compared for efficiency of recovery of insect larvae. Mean recovery for preserved samples was 90.78% compared with 83.03% for unpreserved samples. The range of recovery values for unpreserved samples (66.7%) was more than twice as great as that of preserved samples (29.5%). A paired t-test for means of all taxa showed no significant difference (P < 0.001) between recovery values for preserved and unpreserved samples. In fact, preservation may enhance the recovery of certain groups—Zygoptera, Hemiptera, Trichoptera, and Chironomidae. Apparently samples may be preserved without sacrificing recovery of any specific groups of insect larvae.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 12 , December 1971 , pp. 1649 - 1652
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, R. D. 1959. A modified technique for sorting bottom samples. Limnol. Oceanogr. 4: 223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, W. 1967. Recovery of mites from peat and mineral soils using a new flotation method. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fast, A. W. 1970. An evaluation of the efficiency of zoobenthos separation by sugar flotation. Prog. Fish Cult. 32: 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, W. G. 1964. A flotation method for extracting collembola from organic soils. J. Anim. Ecol. 33: 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macfadyn, A. 1961. Improved funnel-type extraction for soil arthropods. J. Anim. Ecol. 30: 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, J. G. and Needham, P. R.. 1962. A guide to the study of fresh water biology. Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar