Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T07:42:15.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding preferences, growth, and development of Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Brassicaceae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

B. Ulmer
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5E2
C. Gillott
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5E2
M. Erlandson*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Saskatoon Research Centre, 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 0X2
*
1 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: erlandsonm@em.agr.ca).

Abstract

The growth (increase in body mass) and development (progression to specific instar) of the bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata Walker, were examined using up to 14 plant lines from five species of brassicaceous plants. Varietal and breeding lines of Brassica napus L., B. juncea L., B. rapa L., B. carinata L., and Sinapis alba L. were selected on the basis of differing seed and foliar glucosinolate levels. No-choice feeding experiments were conducted with larvae isolated on leaf discs, individual leaves, or entire plants of each line. The no-choice tests showed that M. configurata weight gain and development varied significantly among host plants tested. Two B. juncea lines (AC Vulcan and H-Allyl) and the S. alba lines (AC Pennant and L-GS) were the poorest hosts in terms of larval weight gain, and the two B. juncea lines also significantly slowed development relative to the other lines tested. Mamestra configurata feeding preference, which was examined using a series of paired leaf disc choice tests, was also significantly different among the lines examined. Two B. juncea lines (AC Vulcan and H-Allyl) were significantly less preferred than all the other lines examined. The data extends previous work indicating that specific foliar glucosinolates, such as sinigrin, which is predominant in B. juncea, and sinalbin, which is abundant in S. alba, may provide brassicaceous crops with some protection from M. configurata. Thus, it may be possible to use foliar glucosinolate levels as predictors of M. configurata feeding damage in the development of breeding lines for the genus Brassica.

Résumé

Nous avons suivi la croissance (augmentation de la masse) et le développement (progression jusqu’à un stade donné) chez la Légionnaire bertha, Mamestra configurata Walker, sur plusieurs lignées de plants (jusqu’à 14) de Brassicaceae appartenant à cinq espèces. Des lignées variétales et des lignées reproductrices de Brassica napus L., B. juncea L., B. rapa L., B. carinata L. et Sinapis alba L. ont été choisies en fonction de différences dans le contenu en glucosinolate de leurs feuilles et de leurs graines. Des tests sans choix ont été faits avec des larves isolées sur des disques découpés dans les feuilles, sur des feuilles entières ou sur des plants entiers de chaque lignée. Ces tests ont démontré que le gain de masse et le développement de la Légionnaire bertha varient significativement selon la plante hôte utilisée. Les deux lignées de B. juncea (AC Vulcan et H-Allyl) et les lignées de S. alba (AC Pennant et L-GS) se sont avérées les hôtes les moins efficaces en ce qui a trait aux gains de masse des larves et les deux lignées de B. juncea ont aussi donné lieu a un développement lent comparativement aux autres lignées. Les préférences alimentaires de la Légionnaire bertha, examinées sur des séries de paires de disques de feuilles dans des tests de choix, différent aussi significativement en fonction des lignées. Deux lignées de B. juncea (AC Vulcan et H-Allyl) sont significativement moins appréciées que les autres lignées. Ces données viennent s’ajouter à des informations antérieures et indiquent que les glucosinolates foliaires spécifiques, tels la sinigrine, prédominante chez B. juncea, et la sinalbine, abondante chez S. alba, garantissent sans doute une protection contre la Légionnaire. Il est donc sans doute possible d’utiliser les concentrations foliaires de glucosinolate comme facteurs prédictifs des dommages causés par l’alimentation de la Légionnaire bertha sur les lignées reproductrices du genre Brassica.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 1995. Minutes of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Western Committee on Crop Pests, 19–21 October 1995, Victoria, British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
Bodnaryk, R.P. 1991. Developmental profile of sinalbin (p-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate) in mustard seedlings, Sinapis alba L., and its relationship to insect resistance. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17: 1543–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bracken, G.K., Bucher, G.E. 1977. An estimate of the relationship between density of bertha armyworm and yield loss on rapeseed, based on artificial infestations. Journal of Economic Entomology 70: 701–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucher, G.E., Bracken, G.K. 1976. The bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Artificial diet and rearing technique. The Canadian Entomologist 108: 1327–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daun, J.K., McGregor, D.I. 1981. Glucosinolate analysis of rapeseed (canola): method of the Canadian Grain Commission Grain Research Laboratory. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Canadian Grain CommissionGoogle Scholar
Harper, F.R., Berkenkamp, B. 1975. Revised growth-stage key for Brassica campestris and B. napus. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55: 657–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, C., Isman, M.B. 1993. Influence of foliar glucosinolates in oilseed rape and mustard on feeding and growth of the bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata Walker. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19: 249–66CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCloskey, C., Isman, M.B. 1995. Plant growth stage effects on the feeding and growth responses of the bertha armyworm, Mamestra configurata, to canola and mustard foliage. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 74: 5561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, D.I., Love, H.K. 1987. Analysis of vegetative tissue as a means of facilitating selection for seed glucosinolate composition in Brassica. pp 1514–9 in Proceedings of the 7th International Rapeseed Congress, Poznan, Poland, 11–14 May 1987Google Scholar
Shields, V.D.C., Mitchell, B.K. 1995 a. Sinigrin as a feeding deterrent in two crucifer-feeding, polyphagous lepidopterous species and the effects of feeding stimulant mixtures on deterrency. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 347: 439–46Google Scholar
Shields, V.D.C., Mitchell, B.K. 1995 b. Responses of maxillary styloconic receptors to stimulation by sinigrin, sucrose and inositol in two crucifer-feeding, polyphagous lepidopterous species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 347: 447–57Google Scholar