Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-fg9bn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T12:29:12.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INDIRECT MEASURES OF LARVAL DISPERSAL IN THE CINNABAR MOTH, TYRIA JACOBAEAE (LEPIDOPTERA: ARCTIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Judith H. Myers  and
Barbara J. Campbell
Judith H. Myers
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Resource Ecology and Department of Plant Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Barbara J. Campbell
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Resource Ecology and Department of Plant Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Caterpillar dispersal among food plants is difficult to measure directly in field populations. However, the tendency of fifth instar cinnabar moth caterpillars to drop from plants when disturbed is correlated to measured larval dispersal in experimental populations. This easily executed behavioural test can therefore be used as an indirect indicator of dispersal in different populations. The degree of response of first and fifth instar cinnabar moth larvae to disturbance is correlated for eight populations tested, possibly indicating a common agent selecting for the falling reaction among larvae in these different stages of development.

Many insects drop from their food plants in response to disturbance and we suggest that this behaviour might provide a useful tool to elucidate relationships between insect dispersal and resource exploitation.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 108 , Issue 9 , September 1976 , pp. 967 - 972
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Becker, W. A. 1967. Manual of procedures in quantitative genetics. 2nd ed. Washington State University. 130 pp.Google Scholar
Birch, L. C. 1970. The role of environmental heterogeneity and genetical heterogeneity in determining distribution and abundance, pp. 109–128. In den Boer, P. J. and Gradwell, G. R. (Eds.), Dynamics of populations — Proceedings of the Advanced Study Institute on Dynamics of numbers in populations. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Campbell, B. J. 1975. Food plant spacing and the dispersal tendency of the cinnabar moth larva. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Plant Science, University of British Columbia. 94 pp.Google Scholar
Dempster, J. P. 1971. The population ecology of the cinnabar moth, Tyria jacobaeae L. Oecologia 7: 26–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujisaki, K. 1975. Breakup and reformation of colony in the first-instar larvae of the winter cherry bug, Acanthocoris sordidus Thunberg (Hemiptera: Coreidae), in relation to the defense against their enemies. Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 16: 252–264.Google Scholar
Green, W. Q. 1974. An antagonistic insect/host-plant system: the problem of persistence. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia. 247 pp.Google Scholar
Monro, J. 1967. The exploitation and conservation of resources by populations of insects. J. Anim. Ecol. 36: 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, J. H. 1976. Distribution and dispersal in populations capable of resource depletion: A simulation model. Oecologia 23: 255–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, J. H., and Campbell, B. J.. Distribution and dispersal in populations capable of resource depletion: A field study. Oecologia (in press).Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1960. Qualitative changes in natural populations during changes in abundance. Can. J. Zool. 38: 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar