Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T11:08:06.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Possible Effects of the Pleistocene on the Distributions of North American Scarabaeidae (Coleoptera)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Henry F. Howden
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa, Ontario

Abstract

Factors, i.e., time, climate, and isolation, that have or may possibly have influenced the distribution and speciation of Scarabaeidae in North America are discussed. Specific examples of present distributional patterns in the genera Phyllophaga, Serica, Diplotaxis, Onthophagus, Geotrupes and Trox are mapped and described. A general comparison of the distributional patterns is made, and inferences are drawn concerning centers of dispersal and (or) areas of survival of the insect inhabitants of deserts and temperate forests during the various climatic changes of the Pleistocene.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, G. E. 1963. The distribution of the species of the subgenus Cryobius (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Pterostichus) with special reference to the Bering land bridges and Pleistocene refugia. 10th Pacific Sci. Cong. (Symp. on Biogeography) 1961: 133151.Google Scholar
Becker, E. C. (ed.). 1958. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Ent. 1956, 1: 1941.Google Scholar
Brown, W. L. Jr., 1958. Speciation: the center and the periphery. Proc. Xth Int. Congr. Ent. 1956, 1: 8999.Google Scholar
Crowson, R. A. 1955. The natural classification of the families of Coleoptera. N. Lloyd and Co., Ltd., London, 187 pp.Google Scholar
Darlington, P. J. Jr., 1957. Zoogeography, the geographical distribution of animals. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 675 pp.Google Scholar
Darlington, P. J. Jr., 1959. Area, climate, and evolution. Evolution 13: 488510.Google Scholar
Dillon, L. S. 1956. Wisconsin climate and life zones in North America. Science 123: 167176.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, A. G. 1960. Latitudinal variations in organic diversity. Evolution 14: 6481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, R. F. 1957. Glacial and Pleistocene geology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 553 pp.Google Scholar
Grant, V. 1963. The origin of adaptations. Columbia Univ. Press, New York and London, 606 pp.Google Scholar
Hagmeier, E. M., and Stults, C. D.. 1964. A numerical analysis of the distributional patterns of North American mammals. Syst. Zool. 13: 125155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halffter, G. 1964. La entomofauna Americana, ideas acerca de su origen y distribucion. Folia Ent. Mex. 6: 1108.Google Scholar
Howden, H. F. 1963. Speculations on some beetles, barriers, and climates during the Pleistocene and pre-Pleistocene periods in some non-glaciated portions of North America. Syst. Zool. 12: 178201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howden, H. F. 1964. The Geotrupinae of North and Central America. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 39: 191.Google Scholar
Hubbell, T. H. 1961. Endemism and speciation in relation to Pleistocene changes in Florida and the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Proc. Xlth Int. Congr. Ent. 1960, 1: 466469.Google Scholar
McAtee, W. L. 1954. Speciation without isolation. Ohio J. Sci. 54: 104106.Google Scholar
Munroe, E. G. 1965. Zoogeography of insects and allied groups. A. Rev. Ent. 10: 325344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritcher, P. O. 1958. Biology of Scarabaeidae. A. Rev. Ent. 3: 311334.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1964. Species density of North American recent mammals. Syst. Zool. 13: 5773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyke, E. C. 1939. The origin and distribution of the coleopterous insect fauna of North America. Proc. VIth Pacific Sci. Congr. 4: 255268.Google Scholar
Vaurie, P. 1955. A revision of the genus Trox in North America (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. 106: 189.Google Scholar