Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T00:44:19.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taxonomy of the New World checkered beetle genus Akonesis Opitz (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Peloniinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2018

Weston Opitz
Weston Opitz*
Affiliation:
Florida State Collection of Arthropods, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry/Entomology, 1911 SW 34th Street, Gainesville, Florida, 32614-7100, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: opitz@kwu.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The genera Akonesis Opitz, Crusbatus Opitz, and Diutius Opitz, which comprise a monophyletic group within Peloniinae (Coleoptera: Cleridae), are discussed. The species of Akonesis are reviewed. There are five recognised species of Akonesis: A. pictipennis (Gorham), A. privoatus Opitz new species, A. ridens (Gorham), A. strictus Opitz new species, and A. vittatus (Spinola). According to the morphological analysis performed herein, the species treated in this work are thought to be predatory. Colour patterns of the elytra and field observations suggest that members of Akonesis and Diutius are involved in Batesian mimicry with Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera), and in particular with Galerucinae. Included in this treatise are: a brief discussion of the natural history and evolution of Akonesis species, one Bootstrap consensus tree, a key to Akonesis species, a phylogenetic tree generated by WINCLADA in conjunction with NONA, 15 line drawings, 10 electron micrographs, one distribution map, four photographs of male terminalia, and five colour habitus photographs.

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 150 , Issue 2 , April 2018 , pp. 141 - 155
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Derek Sikes

References

Arnett, R.H., Samuelson, G.A., and Nishida, G.M. 1993. The insect and spider collections of the world. Flora and Fauna Handbook 11, second edition, Sandhill Crane Press, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.Google Scholar
Barr, W.F. and Foster, D.E. 1979. Revision of the genus Aulicus (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Melanderia, 33: 1–31.Google Scholar
Brown, R. W. 1956. Composition of scientific words, second edition, Reese Press, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.Google Scholar
Corporaal, J.B. 1950. Cleridae. In Coleopterorum catalogus supplementa, Pars 23 (editio secunda). Edited by W.D. Hinks. Dr. W. Junk, Gravenhage, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Ekis, G. 1975. Taxonomic and nomenclatural status of clerid taxa described by Massimiliano Spinola (1780–1857) (Coleoptera, Cleridae). Bolletino del Museo Zoologia dell’Università di Torino, 1: 1–80.Google Scholar
Ekis, G. 1977. Classification, phylogeny, and zoogeography of the genus Perilypus (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 227: 1–138.Google Scholar
Foster, D.E. 1976. Revision of North American Trichodes (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Special Publications of the Museum Texas Tech University, 11: 1–86.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A. 2003. NONA version 2.0. A tree searching program. P.A. Goloboff, Fundación Miquel Lillo, Argentina.Google Scholar
Gorham, H.S. 1877. Descriptions of new species of Cleridae, with notes on the genera and corrections of synonymy. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London, 1877: 401–426.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.Google Scholar
Lesne, P. 1917. Notes sur la nomenclature des Clérides (Col). Bulletin de la Société entomologique de France, 8: 148–149.Google Scholar
Maddison, W.P. and Maddison, D.R. 2017. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 3.2. Available from http://mesquiteproject.org [accessed 15 November 2017].Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
Nixon, K.C. 2002. Winclada version 1.00.08. K.C. Nixon, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.Google Scholar
Nixon, K.C. and Carpenter, J.A. 1993. On outgroups. Cladistics, 9: 413–426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Opitz, W. 2004. Classification, natural history, and evolution of the Epiphloeinae (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Part II. The genera Chaetophloeus Opitz and Plocamocera Spinola. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 280: 1–82.Google Scholar
Opitz, W. 2005. Classification, natural history, and evolution of the genus Aphelocerus Kirsch (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 293: 1–128.Google Scholar
Opitz, W. 2010. Classification, natural history, phylogeny, and subfamily composition of the Cleridae and generic content of the subfamilies (Coleoptera: Cleroidea). Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey, 32: 31–128.Google Scholar
Opitz, W. 2011. Classification, natural history, and evolution of the Epiphloeinae (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Part X. The genus Madoniella Pic. Entomologica Basiliensia et Collectionis Frey, 33: 133–248.Google Scholar
Opitz, W. 2014a. Taxonomy of the New World genera of Enopliinae (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 87: 358–384.Google Scholar
Opitz, W. 2014b. Taxonomy of the New World checkered beetle genera Akonesis Opitz, new genus, Antennosus Opitz, new genus, Crusbatus Opitz, new genus, and Diutius Opitz, new genus (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Peloniinae). The Coleopterists Bulletin, 68: 411–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opitz, W. 2016. Taxonomy of the New World Pseudichnea complex (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Peloniinae). The Canadian Entomologist, 148: 260–283.Google Scholar
Opitz, W. 2017. Classification, natural history, and evolution of the subfamily Peloniinae Opitz (Coleoptera: Cleroidea: Cleridae). Part VII. The world genera of Peloniinae (Coleoptera: Cleridae). Linzer biologische Beiträge, 49: 29–117.Google Scholar
Rifkind, J. 2016. Enoclerus Gahan: predators of chemically protected ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Cleridae and Coccinellidae). Insecta Mundi, 514: 1–5.Google Scholar
Rifkind, J. 2017. New species of mutillid mimicking Enoclerus Gahan (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) from Mexico and Central America. Zootaxa, 4231: 409–420.Google Scholar
Solervicens, J. 1986. Revisión taxonomica del genero Eurymetopum Blanchard, 1844 (Coleoptera, Cleridae, Phyllobaeninae). Acta Entomológica Chilena, 13: 11–120.Google Scholar
Spinola, M. 1844. Essai Monographique sur les Clérites: Insectes Coléoptéres. Tome 2. Frères Ponthenier, Genoa, Italy.Google Scholar
Standfuss, M. 1896. Handbuch der paläarktischen Gross-Schmetterlinge für Forscher und Sammler. Gustav Fischer, Jena, Germany.Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP٭. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (٭and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, United States of America.Google Scholar
Tuomikoski, R. 1967. Notes on some principles of phylogenetic systematics. Annales Entomologici Fennici, 33: 137–147.Google Scholar
Watrous, L.E. and Wheeler, Q.D. 1981. The outgroup comparison method of character analysis. Systematic Zoology, 30: 1–11.Google Scholar