Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T09:01:44.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

TOXICITY OF INSECTICIDES TO DOUGLAS-FIR TUSSOCK MOTH, ORGYIA PSEUDOTSUGATA (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE): II. RESIDUAL TOXICITY AND RAINFASTNESS12

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Jacqueline L. Robertson  and
Lucille M. Boelter
Jacqueline L. Robertson
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, California 94701
Lucille M. Boelter
Affiliation:
Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Berkeley, California 94701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fourth instar Douglas-fir tussock moth were used to assess the residual toxicity of 10 insecticides applied to Douglas-fir seedlings. Among the 10, carbaryl compared most favorably to DDT. Rainfastness of the insecticides was tested by means of a rainchamber. Permethrin, diflubenzuron, and carbaryl were least affected by simulated rainfall, while acephate and trichlorfon were seriously and adversely affected.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 111 , Issue 10 , October 1979 , pp. 1161 - 1175
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carter, M. T. 1972. The effect of deposit pattern type on the persistence of an insecticide as affected by formulation, rainfall, aging, and weathering. Ph. D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.42 pp.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. E. 7.5. Registration. In The Douglas-fir tussock moth: a synthesis. Chapter 7, Population management—chemical control. U.S. Dep. Agric. Forest Serv. Tech. Bull. 1585 (in press).Google Scholar
Guenther, W. C. 1964. Analysis of variance. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.199 pp.Google Scholar
Lyon, R. L., Richmond, C. E., Robertson, J. L., and Lucas, B. A.. 1972. Rearing diapause and diapause-free western spruce budworm (Choristoneura occidentalis) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) on an artificial diet. Can. Ent. 104: 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markin, G. P., Brewer, J. W., and Batzer, H. O.. Residual field life of OrtheneR, Sevin-4-oilR, and Dylox 1.5R bioassay with Douglas-fir tussock moth larvae. U.S. Dep. Agric. Forest Serv. Res. Note, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oregon (in press).Google Scholar
Robertson, J. L. and Boelter, L. M.. 1979. Toxicity of insecticides to Douglas-fir tussock moth, Orgyia pseudotsugata (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). 1. Contact and feeding toxicity. Can. Ent. 111: 1145–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar