Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T23:25:05.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Constrained Approximation with Jacobi Weights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Kirill Kopotun
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba e-mail: kopotunk@cc.umanitoba.ca
Dany Leviatan
Affiliation:
Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Mathematical Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel e-mail: leviatan@post.tau.ac.il
Igor Shevchuk
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics, National Taras Shevchenko University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine e-mail: shevchuk@univ.kiev.ua
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In this paper, we prove that for $\ell \,=\,1$ or 2 the rate of best $\ell $ - monotone polynomial approximation in the ${{L}_{p}}$ norm $\left( 1\,\le \,p\,\le \,\infty \right)$ weighted by the Jacobi weight ${{w}_{\alpha ,\,\beta }}\left( x \right)\,:=\,{{\left( 1\,+\,x \right)}^{\alpha }}{{\left( 1\,-\,x \right)}^{\beta }}$ with $\alpha ,\,\beta \,>\,-1/p$ if $p\,<\,\infty $ , or $\alpha ,\,\beta \,\ge \,0$ if $p\,=\,\infty $ , is bounded by an appropriate $\left( \ell \,+\,1 \right)$ -st modulus of smoothness with the same weight, and that this rate cannot be bounded by the $\left( \ell \,+\,2 \right)$ -nd modulus. Related results on constrained weighted spline approximation and applications of our estimates are also given.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2016

References

[1] De Bonis, M. C., Mastroianni, G., and Russo, M. G., Polynomial approximation with special doubling weights. Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) 69(2003), no. 1-2, 159184.Google Scholar
[2] De Bonis, M. C., Mastroianni, G., and Viggiano, M., K-functionals, moduli of smoothness and weighted best approximation of the semiaxis. In: Functions, series, operators (Budapest, 1999), Jénos Bolyai Math. Soc. Budapest, 2002, pp. 181211.Google Scholar
[3] DeVore, R. A., Hu, Y. K., and Leviatan, D., Convex polynomial and spline approximation in Lp, 0 < p < ∞. Constr. Approx. 12(1996), 409422.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02433051 Google Scholar
[4] Ditzian, Z., Polynomial approximation and wr ϕ twenty years later. Surv. Approx. Theory 3(2007), 106151.Google Scholar
[5] Ditzian, Z. and Totik, V., Moduli of smoothness. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 9, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
[6] Kopotun, K. A., Pointwise and uniform estimates for convex approximation of functions by algebraic polynomials. Constr. Approx. 10(1994), no. 2,153178.http://dx.doi.Org/10.1007/BF01263061 Google Scholar
[7] Kopotun, K. A., Weighted moduli of smoothness of k-monotone functions and applications. J. Approx. Theory 192(2015), 102131. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.jat.2O14.11.006 Google Scholar
[8] Kopotun, K. A., Polynomial approximation with doubling weights. Acta Math. Hungar. 146(2015), no. 2, 496535.http://dx.doi.Org/10.1007/s10474-015-0519-4 Google Scholar
[9] Kopotun, K. A., Polynomial approximation with doubling weights having finitely many zeros and singularities. J. Approx. Theory 198(2015), 2462.http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.jat.2O15.05.003 Google Scholar
[10] Kopotun, K. A., Leviatan, D., Prymak, A., and Shevchuk, I. A., Uniform and pointwise shape preserving approximation by algebraic polynomials. Surv. Approx. Theory 6(2011), 2474.Google Scholar
[11] Ky, N. X., On approximation of functions by polynomials with weight. Acta Math. Hungar. 59(1992), no. 1–2, 4958.http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00052090 Google Scholar
[12] Mastroianni, G. and Totik, V., Best approximation and moduli of smoothness for doubling weights. J. Approx. Theory 110(2001), no. 2,180199.http://dx.doi.Org/10.1006/jath.2000.3546 Google Scholar
[13] Shvedov, A. S., Orders of coapproximations of functions by algebraic polynomials. (Russian) Mat. Zametki 29(1981), no. 1,117–130,156.Google Scholar