Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T23:11:28.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dense Subspaces of Product Spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Toshiji Terada
Toshiji Terada*
Affiliation:
Yokohama National University, Hodogaya, Yokohama, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Unless otherwise specified, all spaces considered here are regular T1-spaces. A space X is called σ-discrete if X is the union of a countable family of discrete subspaces. Arhangel'skii [2] showed that the class of spaces which contain dense σ-discrete subspaces is productive. The fact that the class of spaces which contain dense subspaces of countable pseudocharacter is productive is obtained by Amirdzanov [1]. On the other hand, the class of spaces which contain metrizable spaces as dense subspaces is obviously not productive. As a generalized concept of metrizable spaces there is the concept of σ-spaces [14]. This class of spaces has many similar properties to the class of metrizable spaces. However we will point out a remarkable difference between the class of metrizable spaces and the class of σ-spaces by showing that the class of spaces which contain σ-spaces as dense subspaces is productive.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , 01 December 1983 , pp. 986 - 1000
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1983

References

1. Amirdzanov, G. P., Everywhere dense subspaces of countable pseudo-character and other separability generalizations, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 234 (1977), 993–996; Soviet Math. Dokl. 18 (1977), 789–793.Google Scholar
2. Arhangel'skii, A. V., Compact Hausdorff spaces and unions of countable families of metrizable spaces, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 233 (1977), 989–992; Soviet Math. Dokl. 75 (1977), 165–169.Google Scholar
3. Arhangel'skii, A. V., Structure and classification of topological spaces and cardinal invariants, Uspkhi Math. Nauk 33:6 (1978), 29–84; Russian Math. Surveys 33:6 (1978), 33–96.Google Scholar
4. Burke, D. K. and Hodel, R. E., On the number of compact subsets of a topological space, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 58 (1976), 363–368.Google Scholar
5. Burke, D K. and Lutzer, D. J., Recent advances in the theory of generalized metric spaces, Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Math. 24 (Dekker, 1976), 1–70.Google Scholar
6. Ceder, J. G., Some generalizations of metric spaces, Pacific J. Math. 11 (1961), 105–125.Google Scholar
7. Engelking, R., General topology (PWN, Warszawa, 1977).Google Scholar
8. Gerlits, J. and Juhasz, I., On left-separated compact spaces, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae 79(1978), 53–61.Google Scholar
9. Ginsburg, J. and Woods, G., A cardinal inequality for topological spaces involving closed discrete sets, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 64 (1977), 357–360.Google Scholar
10. Hodel, R. H., A technique for proving inequalities in cardinal functions, Topology Proceedings 4 (1979), 115–120.Google Scholar
11. Juhasz, I., Cardinal functions in topology, Math. Centre Tracts 34 (Amsterdam, 1971).Google Scholar
12. Nagata, J., A note on Filipov's theorem, Proc. Japan Acad. 11 (1969), 30–33.Google Scholar
13. Noble, N., The continuity of functions on Cartesian products, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 149 (1970), 187–198.Google Scholar
14. Okuyama, A., Some generalizations of metric spaces, their metrization theorems and product theorems, Sci. Rep. Tokyo Kyoiku Daigaku, Ser. A, 9 (1967), 236–254.Google Scholar
15. Pol, E.. Some examples in the dimension theory of Tychonoff spaces, Fund. Math. 102 (1979), 29–43.Google Scholar