Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T10:32:59.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hyperbolic Convolution Operators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Takao Kakita
Takao Kakita*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto and Waseda University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Hyperbolic differential operators with constant coefficients introduced and studied systematically by Gårding (4), were characterized by the existence of the fundamental solution with some cone condition, according to Hörmander (6). Recently Ehrenpreis, extending the notion of hyperbolicity due to Gårding, has defined hyperbolic operators for distributions with compact support in the convolution sense. Under the hypothesis that the operator is invertible as a distribution, he has established a theorem analogous to the theorem of Hörmander mentioned above (3).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 17 , 1965 , pp. 559 - 582
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1965

References

1. Bourbaki, N., Espaces vectoriels topologiques (Paris, 1955), chaps. 1-2, pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
2. D. Duff, G. F., On the Riemann matrix of a hyperbolic system, MRC Report, 246 (1961), Wisconsin.Google Scholar
3. Ehrenpreis, L., Solutions of some problems of division V. Hyperbolic operators, Amer. J. Math., 84 (1962), 324–348.Google Scholar
4. Gárding, L., Linear hyperbolic differential equations with constant coefficients, Acta Math., 85 (1951), 1–62.Google Scholar
5. Hormander, L., Hypoelliptic convolution equations, Math. Scand., 9 (1961), 178–184.Google Scholar
6. Hormander, L., Linear partial differential operators (New York, 1963).Google Scholar
7. Lions, J. L., Supports dans la transformation de Laplace, J. Analyse Math., 2 (1952-53), 369–380.Google Scholar
8. Schwartz, L., Théorie des distributions (2nd éd.; Paris), vol. 1 (1957), vol. 2 (1959).Google Scholar