Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-01T06:56:10.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Types for Unramified p-Adic Unitary Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Kazutoshi Kariyama
Kazutoshi Kariyama*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Management and Information Science, Onomichi University, Onomichi 722-8506, Japan e-mail:kariyama@onomichi-u.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let $F$ be a non-archimedean local field of residue characteristic neither 2 nor 3 equipped with a galois involution with fixed field ${{F}_{0}}$, and let $G$ be a symplectic group over $F$ or an unramified unitary group over ${{F}_{0}}$. Following the methods of Bushnell–Kutzko for $\text{GL}(N,F)$, we define an analogue of a simple type attached to a certain skew simple stratum, and realize a type in $G$. In particular, we obtain an irreducible supercuspidal representation of $G$ like $\text{GL}(N,F)$.

Keywords

22E5022D99p-adic unitary grouptypesupercuspidal representationHecke algebra

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 60 , Issue 5 , October 2008 , pp. 1067 - 1107
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2008

References

[1] Adler, J. D., Self-contragradient supercuspidal representation of GL n. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 125(1997), no. 8, 2471–2479.Google Scholar
[2] Adler, J. D., Refined anisotropic K-types and supercuspidal representations. Pacific J. Math. 185(1998), no. 1, 1–32.Google Scholar
[3] Blondel, C., Sp (2N)-Covers for self-contragradient supercuspidal representations of GL(N). Ann. Sci. ´E cole. Norm. Sup. 37(2004), no. 4, 533–558.Google Scholar
[4] Bushnell, C. J., Representations of reductive p-adic groups: localization of Hecke algebras and applications. J. London Math. Soc. 63(2001), no. 2, 364–386.Google Scholar
[5] Bushnell, C. J. and Kutzko, P., The Admissible Dual of GL(N) Via Compact Open Subgroups. Annals of Mathematics Studies 129, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993.Google Scholar
[6] Bushnell, C. J. and Kutzko, P., Smooth representations of reductive p-adic groups: structure theory via types. Proc. London Math. Soc. 77(1998), no. 3, 582–634.Google Scholar
[7] Bushnell, C. J. and Kutzko, P., Semisimple types in GL n. Compositio Math. 119(1999), no. 1, 53–97.Google Scholar
[8] Bruhat, F. and Tits, J. Groupes réductifs sur un corps local. I: Données radicielles valuées. Inst. Hautes ´E tudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1972), no. 41, 5–251.Google Scholar
[9] Carayol, H., Représentations cuspidales du groupe linéaire. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. 17(1984), no. 2, 191–225.Google Scholar
[10] Carter, R.W., Finite Groups of Lie Type, Conjugacy Classes and Complex Characters. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1985.Google Scholar
[11] Carter, R.W., Simple Groups of Lie Type. Pure and Applied Mathematics 28, John Wiley, London, 1972.Google Scholar
[12] Casselman, W., Introduction to the theory of admissible representations of p-adic reductive groups. http://www.math.ubc.ca/˜ cass/research.htmlGoogle Scholar
[13] Deligne, P. and Lusztig, G., Representations of reductive groups over finite fields. Ann. of Math. 103(1976), no. 1, 103–161.Google Scholar
[14] Gelfand, I. M. and Kazhdan, D. A., Representations of the group GL(n, K) where K is a local field. In: Lie Groups and Their Representations. Halsted, New York, 1975, pp. 95–118.Google Scholar
[15] Howellet, R. B. and Lehrer, G. I. , Induced cuspidal representations and generalized Hecke rings. Invent. Math. 58(1980), no. 1, 37–64.Google Scholar
[16] Iwahori, N. and Matsumoto, H., On some Bruhat decomposition and the structure of the Hecke rings of p-adic Chevalley groups. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1965), no. 25, 5–48.Google Scholar
[17] Kariyama, K. Very cuspidal representations of p-adic symplectic groups. J. Algebra 207(1998), no. 1, 205–255.Google Scholar
[18] Morris, L., Some tamely ramified supercuspidal representations of symplectic groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. 63(1991), no. 3, 519–551.Google Scholar
[19] Morris, L., Tamely ramified superecuspidal representations of classical groups. I. Filtrations. Ann. Sci. ´E cole. Norm. Sup. 24(1991), no. 6, 705–738.Google Scholar
[20] Moy, A. and Prasad, P., Unramified minimal K-types for p-adic groups. Invent. Math. 116(1994), no. 1-3, 393–408.Google Scholar
[21] Roche, A., Types and Hecke algebras for principal series representations of split reductive p-adic groups. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. 34(1998), no. 3, 361–423.Google Scholar
[22] Serre, J.-P., Cohomologie Galoisienne. Fifth edition. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 5, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1964.Google Scholar
[23] Sécherre, V., Représentations lisse de GL(m, D). I. caracter`es simples. Bull. Soc. Math. France 132(2004), no. 3, 327–396.Google Scholar
[24] Sécherre, V., Représentations lisse de GL(m, D). II. β-extensions. Compos. Math. 141(2005), no. 6, 1531–1550.Google Scholar
[25] Sécherre, V., Représentations lisse de GL(m, D). III. types simples. Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. 38(2005), no. 6, 951–977.Google Scholar
[26] Springer, T. A. and Steinberg, R.. Conjugacy classes. In: Seminar on Algebraic Groups and Related Finite Groups. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 131, Springer, Berlin, 1970, 167–266.Google Scholar
[27] Steinberg, R., Lectures on Chevalley groups. Yale University, New Haven, CT, 1967.Google Scholar
[28] Stevens, S., Double coset decompositions and intertwining. Manuscripta Math. 106(2001), no. 3, 349–364.Google Scholar
[29] Stevens, S., Intertwining and supercuspidal types for p-adic classical groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. 83(2001), no. 1, 120–140.Google Scholar
[30] Stevens, S., Semisimple characters for p-adic classical groups. Duke Math. J. 127(2005), no. 1, 123–173.Google Scholar
[31] Tits, J., Reductive groups over local fields. In: Automorphic Forms, Representations and L-Functions. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 33, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, pp. 29–69.Google Scholar
[32] Yu, J.-K., Construction of tame supercuspidal representations. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14(2001), no. 3, 579–622.Google Scholar
[33] Weil, A., Basic Number Theory, Reprint of the third edition. Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften 144, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995.Google Scholar