Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T01:30:31.138Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Frankfurt Cases and Overdetermination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Eric Funkhouser
Eric Funkhouser*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR72701, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For nearly forty years now, Frankfurt cases have served as one of the major contributors to the compatibilist's cause with respect to moral responsibility. These cases typically involve a causally preempted condition that is supposed to guarantee a choice without causing it. This has had the effect of softening up some to the idea that determinism does not exclude moral responsibility simply in virtue of guaranteeing a unique future. I believe that these traditional Frankfurt cases adequately support this cause. But I also believe that the traditional versions of Frankfurt cases suffer from some rhetorical defects.

My strategy is as follows. First, I want to respond to a dilemma that has been raised by some libertarians against arguments utilizing Frankfurt cases. This dilemma has the effect of raising a question-begging charge against such arguments. Part of my response is to draw attention to the relevant principle that I think Frankfurt cases should really target, a principle slightly different from Harry Frankfurt's original Principle of Alternate Possibilities. Second, I elaborate and defend the claim that traditional Frankfurt cases involve causal preemption.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 341 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, Jonathan. 1989. Events and their Names (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett).Google Scholar
Berofsky, Bernard. 2003. ‘Classical Compatibilism: Not Dead Yet’, in Widerker and McKenna (2003).Google Scholar
Bunzl, Martin. 1979. ‘Causal Overdetermination,’ Journal of Philosophy 76, 134–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, John Hall, Ned and Paul, L.A.. 2004. Causation and Counterfactuals (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1969/1980. ‘The Individuation of Events,’ reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 1982. ‘Responsibility and Control’, Journal of Philosophy 79:1, 24–40.Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 1994. The Metaphysics of Free Will (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers).Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 1999. ‘Recent Work on Moral Responsibility,’ Ethics 110, 93–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 2002. ‘Frankfurt-Style Compatibilism,’ in Contours of Agency: Essays on Themes from Harry Franfurt, Buss, Sarah and Overton, Lee eds. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
Fischer, John Martin. 2006. ‘Free Will and Moral Responsibility’, in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, Copp, David ed. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1969/1988. ‘Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility,’ Journal of Philosophy 46: 23, 829–39. Reprinted in Frankfurt (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, Carl. 1996. ‘In Defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities: Why I Don't Find Frankfurt's Argument Convincing,’ Philosophical Perspectives 10, 403–17.Google Scholar
Goetz, Stewart. 2005. ‘Frankfurt-Style Counterexamples and Begging the Question,’ Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29, 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque. 2000. ‘Alternate Possibilities and Responsibility’, Journal of Social Philosophy 31: 3, 259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque and McKenna, Michael. 2004. ‘Dialectical Delicacies in the Debate about Freedom and Alternative Possibilities,’ Journal of Philosophy 101: 6, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, David. 2000. ‘Moral Responsibility and Unavoidable Action,’ Philosophical Studies 97, 195–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert. 1985. Free Will and Values (Albany, NY: SUNY-Albany Press).Google Scholar
Kane, Robert. 1996. The Significance of Free Will (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1986. Philosophical Papers, Volume II (New York, NY: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 2000/2004. ‘Causation as Influence,’ Journal of Philosophy 97: 4, 182–97. Reprinted in Collins, et al. 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred and Robb, David. 1998. ‘Rescuing Frankfurt-Style Cases,’ The Philosophical Review 107: 1, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alfred and Robb, David. 2003. ‘Bbs, Magnets and Seesaws: The Metaphysics of Frankfurt-style Cases,’ in Widerker and McKenna (2003).Google Scholar
Pereboom, Derk. 2001. Living without Free Will (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Jonathan. 2000/2004. ‘Trumping Preemption,’ Journal of Philosophy 97, 165–81. Reprinted in Collins, et al. 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Eleonore. 1999. ‘Alternative Possibilities and Moral Responsibility: The Flicker of Freedom,’ The Journal of Ethics 3, 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpe, Kevin. 2003. ‘Trumping Frankfurt: Why the Kane-Widerker Objection is Irrelevant,’ Philosophia Christi 5: 2, 485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter. 1978. ‘Ability and Responsibility,’ The Philosophical Review 87: 2, 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widerker, David. 1995a. ‘Libertarian Freedom and the Avoidability of Decisions,’ Faith and Philosophy 12: 1, 113–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widerker, David. 1995b. ‘Libertarianism and Frankfurt's Attack on the Principle of Alternative Possibilities,’ The Philosophical Review 104: 2, 247–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widerker, David and Michael, McKenna. 2003. Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities (Burlington, VT: Ashgate).Google Scholar