Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:36:49.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hume and the phenomenology of agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Joshua M. Wood
Joshua M. Wood*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Wellesley College, 106 Central St. Founders Hall 322, Wellesley, MA02481, USA
*
*Email: jwood5@wellesley.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some philosophers argue that Hume, given his theory of causation, is committed to an implausibly thin account of what it is like to act voluntarily. Others suggest, on the basis of his argument against free will, that Hume takes no more than an illusory feature of action to distinguish the experience of performing an act from the experience of merely observing an act. In this paper, I argue that Hume is committed to neither an unduly parsimonious nor a sceptical account of the phenomenology of agency.

Keywords

Humeactionphenomenologycausationfreedomnaturalism
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 44 , Issue 3-4 , August 2014 , pp. 496 - 517
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M., and Geach, P. T.. 1961. Three Philosophers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Aune, Bruce. 1977. Reason and Action. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, Michael. 1996. “Natures and Laws from Descartes to Hume.” In The Philosophical Canon in the 17th and 18th Centuries: Essays in Honour of John W. Yolton, edited by Rogers, G. A. J. and Tomaselli, Sylvana, 83–108. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. 1991. A Progress of Sentiments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baier, Annette C. 2010. “Hume.” In A Companion to the Philosophy of Action, edited by O’Connor, Timothy and Sandis, Constantine, 513–520. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillie, James. 2000. Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Hume on Morality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Thomas. 1995. “Objectivity, Causality, and Agency.” In The Body and the Self, edited by Bermúdez, José Luis, Marcel, A. J., and Eilan, Naomi, 107–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bayne, Tim. 2008. “The Phenomenology of Agency.” Philosophy Compass 3 (1): 182–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, Tim, and Levy, Neil. 2006. “The Feeling of Doing: Deconstructing the Phenomenology of Agency.” In Disorders of Volition, edited by Sebanz, Natalie and Prinz, Wolfgang, 49–68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bricke, John. 1984. “Hume’s Volitions.” In Philosophers of the Scottish Enlightenment, edited by Hope, V., 70–90. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bricke, John. 1996. Mind and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, Alexander. 1990. The Tradition of Scottish Philosophy: A New Perspective on the Enlightenment. Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble Books.Google Scholar
Chappell, Vere. 1999. Hobbes and Bramhall on Liberty and Necessity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Francis J., and Horch, Kenneth W.. 1986. “Kinesthesia.” In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Vol. 1: Sensory Processes and Perception, edited by Boff, Kenneth R., Kaufman, Lloyd, and Thomas, James P., 13.1–13.62. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Collins, Anthony. 1717. A Philosophical Inquiry Concerning Human Liberty. London: Printed for R. Robinson.Google Scholar
Connolly, John. 1987. “David Hume and the Concept of Volition: The Will as Impression.” Hume Studies 13 (2): 276–305.Google Scholar
Crousaz, Jean-Pierre de. 1724. A New Treatise of the Art of Thinking. 2 Vols. London: Printed for Tho. Woodward.Google Scholar
Descartes, René. 1985. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 1. Translated by Cottingham, John, Stoothoff, Robert, Murdoch, Dugald. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian. 2002. “Human Agency, Realism and the New Essentialism.” In Recent Themes in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Steve, Clarke Timothy, D. Lyons, 193–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, Carl. 1990. On Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James. 2005. Of Liberty and Necessity: The Free Will Debate in Eighteenth-Century British Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, T., Tienson, J., and Graham, G.. 2003. “The Phenomenology of First-Person Agency.” In Physicalism and Mental Causation: The Metaphysics of Mind and Action, edited by Walter, S. and Heckmann, H.-D., 323–340. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 2004. “Agency and Alienation.” In Naturalism in Question, edited by Caro, Mario De and Macarthur, David, 173–187. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hossack, Keith. 2003. “Consciousness in Act and Action.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1975. Enquiries Concerning the Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge. Revised 3rd edition by P.H. Nidditch. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature, edited by L.A. Selby-Bigge. Revised 2nd edition by P.H. Nidditch. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2009. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, edited by Tom L. Beauchamp. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, David. 2011. A Treatise of Human Nature. 2 Vols, edited by David Fate Norton, Mary J. Norton. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1981. The Principles of Psychology. 2 Vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kemp Smith, Norman. 1941. The Philosophy of David Hume. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keutner, David. 1987. “David Hume and the Concept of Volition: The Will as Wish.” Hume Studies 13 (2): 306–322.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2008. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reasoning and Moral Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magri, Tito. 2008. “Hume on the Direct Passions and Motivation.” In Blackwell Companion to Hume, edited by Radcliffe, Elizabeth S., 185–200. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcel, Anthony. 2003. “The Sense of Agency: Awareness and Ownership of Action.” In Agency and Self-Awareness: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology, edited by Roessler, Johannes and Eilan, Naomi, 48–93. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marchetti, C., and Della Sala, S.. 1998. “Disentangling the Alien and Anarchic Hand.” Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 3: 191–207.Google Scholar
Mayr, Erasmus. 2011. Understanding Human Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melden, A. I. 1961. Free Actions. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Mumford, Stephen, and Lill Anjum, Rani. 2011. Getting Causes from Powers. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pacherie, Elisabeth. 2007. “The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency.” Psyche 13 (1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Penelhum, Terence. 2009. “Hume’s Moral Psychology.” In Cambridge Companion to Hume, edited by Norton, David Fate and Taylor, Jacqueline, 238–269. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pitson, A. E. 2002. Hume’s Philosophy of the Self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Paul. 2010. The Riddle of Hume’s Treatise. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1995. The Letters, edited by Samuel Shirley. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1986. “The Will in Hume’s Treatise.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1): 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Galen. 1986. Freedom and Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1977. Hume. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 2007. “‘Gilding or Staining’ the World with ‘Sentiments’ and ‘Phantasms’.” In The New Hume Debate, edited by Read, Rupert and Richman, Kenneth A., 16–30. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter. 1983. An Essay on Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, David J. 2000. The Possibility of Practical Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wakefield, J., and Dreyfus, H.. 1991. “Intentionality and the Phenomenology of Action.” In John Searle and His Critics, edited by Lepore, E. and van Gulick, R., 259–270. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wood, Joshua M. 2014. “Hume and the Metaphysics of Agency.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (1): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar