Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T16:29:22.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Identifying the Mental with the Physical

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Peter Smith
Peter Smith*
Affiliation:
University College of Wales, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our states of belief and desire are no doubt supervenient on the overall pattern of our physical states. But can this minimal physicalist presumption be strengthened into a claim to the effect that our mental states are each identical with some specific corresponding physical state? A developed identity theory will need, in a sense to be made clear, a schema for specifying the physical state which is supposed to be identical with a given mental state. And there are problems in formulating such a schema. The special difficulties faced here by a type identity theory are well known, and will not be discussed further in this present paper. But equally, there are problems in constructing an identification schema for employment with a token identity theory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 227 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See for example McGinn, Colin ‘Mental states, natural kinds and psychological laws,’ Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume, 52 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2 Peacocke, Christopher Holistic Explanation: Action, Space, Interpretation (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1979).Google Scholar I am grateful to Peacocke for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

3 Peacocke, 117·18

4 It should be noted that what I here give as an identification schema is initially produced in Peacocke's book as a way of picking out the physical state which 'realizes’ a belief, and only later does Peacocke argue that we can and should identify a psychological state with its physical realization.

5 Evans, Gareth ‘Can there be vague objects?', Analysis, 38 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6 See, for example, Mackie, J.L. ‘Causes and Conditions,’ American Philosophical Quarterly, 2 (1965).Google Scholar

7 See Dummett, Michael Truth and Other Enigmas (london: Duckworth 1978). 149.Google Scholar

8 Since first submitting this paper for publication in 1981 I have seen Hornsby's, Jennifer very interesting paper Which Physical Events are Mental Events?', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 81 (1980-81)Google Scholar where she also makes telling use of the result due to Gareth Evans which I employed in §II above.