Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-04T06:23:25.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The savings problem in the original position: assessing and revising a model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Eric Brandstedt
Eric Brandstedt*
Affiliation:
Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Science, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
*
Email: e.brandstedt@lse.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The common conception of justice as reciprocity seemingly is inapplicable to relations between non-overlapping generations. This is a challenge also to John Rawls’s theory of justice as fairness. This text responds to this by way of reinterpreting and developing Rawls’s theory. First, by examining the original position as a model, some revisions of it are shown to be wanting. Second, by drawing on the methodology of constructivism, an alternative solution is proposed: an amendment to the primary goods named ‘sustainability of values’. This revised original position lends support to intergenerational justice as fairness.

Keywords

Intergenerational justicefairnessthe original positionmodelsRawlsconstructivismsustainability of values

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 47 , Issue 2-3: Special issue: Ethics and Future Generations , 2017 , pp. 269 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Attas, Daniel. 2009. “A Transgenerational Difference Principle.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas H., 189–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1978. “Circumstances of Justice and Future Generations.” In Obligations to Future Generations, edited by Sikora, R. I. and Barry, Brian, 204–248. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1989. Democracy, Power, and Justice: Essays in Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 10.1007/978-1-349-20201-0Google Scholar
Brandstedt, Eric. 2015. “The Circumstances of Intergenerational Justice.” Moral Philosophy and Politics 2: 33–55. doi:10.1515/mopp-2014-0018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen, Gibbard, Allan, and Railton, Peter. 1992. “Toward Fin de siecle Ethics: Some Trends.” The Philosophical Review 101 (1): 115–189. doi:10.2307/2185045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de-Shalit, Avner. 1995. Why Posterity Matters. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
English, Jane. 1977. “Justice Between Generations.” Philosophical Studies 31 (2): 91–104. doi:10.1007/BF01857179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2014. “Original Position.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/original-position/.Google Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen. 2011. “Rawls and Climate Change: Does Rawlsian Political Philosophy Pass the Global Test?” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (2): 125–151. doi:10.1080/13698230.2011.529705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, Stephen M. 2009. “A Contract on Future Generations?” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas H., 77–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosseries, Axel. 2009. “Three Models of Intergenerational Reciprocity.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas, 119–146. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282951.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Joseph. 2013. “The Structure of Intergenerational Cooperation.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 41: 31–66. 10.1111/papa.2013.41.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyd, David. 2009. “A Value or an Obligation? Rawls on Justice to Future Generations.” In Intergenerational Justice, edited by Gosseries, Axel and Meyer, Lukas H., 167–188. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199282951.003.0007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubin, D. Clayton. 1976. “Justice and Future Generations.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 6 (1): 70–83. doi:10.2307/2265063?ref=no-x-route:4d52d424cb95ae150d64058bda739e23.Google Scholar
Mazor, Joe. 2010. “Liberal Justice, Future People, and Natural Resource Conservation.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38: 380–408. 10.1111/papa.2010.38.issue-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Lukas. 2015. “Intergenerational Justice.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/justice-intergenerational/.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1980. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” The Journal of Philosophy 77 (9): 515–572.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1982. “Social Unity and Primary Goods.” In Utilitarianism and Beyond, edited by Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard, 159–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511611964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness. Edited by Kelly, Erin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism. Expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 2009. “Justice as Reciprocity.” In John Rawls. Collected Papers, edited by Freeman, Samuel, 190–224. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. 2003. The Practice of Value. Edited by Wallace, R. Jay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. 1958. “An Exact Consumption-Loan Model of Interest with or without the Social Contrivance of Money.” Journal of Political Economy 66: 467–482. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1826989. 10.1086/258100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. 2013. Death and the Afterlife. Edited by Kolodny, Niko. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199982509.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfsdorf, David. 2013. Pleasure in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar