Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Understanding Race: The Case for Political Constructionism in Public Discourse

  • David Ludwig (a1)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to develop an understanding-based argument for an explicitly political specification of the concept of race. It is argued that a specification of race in terms of hierarchical social positions is best equipped to guide causal reasoning about racial inequality in the public sphere. Furthermore, the article provides evidence that biological and cultural specifications of race mislead public reasoning by encouraging confusions between correlates and causes of racial inequality. The article concludes with a more general case for incorporating empirical evidence about public reasoning into philosophical debates about competing specifications of the concept of race.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Understanding Race: The Case for Political Constructionism in Public Discourse
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Understanding Race: The Case for Political Constructionism in Public Discourse
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Understanding Race: The Case for Political Constructionism in Public Discourse
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Adams, Rachel, Sumner, Petroc, Vivian-Griffiths, Solveiga, Barrington, Amy, Williams, Andrew, Boivin, Jacky, Chambers, Christopher D., and Bott, Lewis. 2017. “How Readers Understand Causal and Correlational Expressions Used in News Headlines.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 23 (1): 1.
Alcoff, Linda. 2006. Visible Identities: Race, Gender, and the Self. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alexander, Michelle. 2012. The New Jim Crow. New York: The New Press.
Amesberger, Helga, and Halbmayr, Brigitte. 2005. “,Race/Rasse’ und Whiteness—Adäquate Begriffe zur Analyse gesellschaftlicher Ungleichheit?L’Homme 16 (2): 135–43.
Apfelbaum, Eva, Pauker, Kristin, Sommers, Samuel, and Ambady, Nalini. 2010. “In Blind Pursuit of Racial Equality?Psychological Science 21 (11): 1587–92.
Bach, Theodore. 2016. “Social Categories Are Natural Kinds, Not Objective TypesJournal for Social Ontology 2 (2): 177201.
Balibar, Etienne. 1991. “Is There a ‘Neo-Racism’?” In Race, Nation, Class, edited by Balibar, Etienne and Wallerstein, Immanuel, 1728. London: Verso.
Barskanmaz, Cengiz. 2011. "Rasse–Unwort des Antidiskriminierungsrechts?" Kritische Justiz 44 (4): 382–89.
Bessone, Magali. 2013. Sans Distinction De Race? Paris: Vrin.
Bleske-Rechek, April, Morrison, Katelyn M., and Heidtke, Luke. 2015. “Causal Inference from Descriptions of Experimental and Non-Experimental ResearchThe Journal of General Psychology 142 (1): 4870.
Blum, Lawrence. 2002. “ I’m Not a Racist, but …”: The Moral Quandary of Race. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Blum, Lawrence. 2010. “Racialized Groups: The Sociohistorical Consensus.” The Monist 93 (2): 298320.
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2006. Racism without Racists. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Burgess, Alexis, and Plunkett, David. 2013. "Conceptual Ethics I." Philosophy Compass 8 (12): 1091-101.
Cappelen, Herman. 2018 Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cooper, Anna Julia. (1892) 1988. A Voice from the South. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cremer, Hendrik. 2010. Ein Grundgesetz Ohne ‘Rasse’: Vorschlag Für Eine Änderung von Artikel 3 Grundgesetz. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Menschenrechte.
De Regt, Henk. 2017. Understanding Scientific Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Donovan, Brian M. 2014. “Playing with Fire? The Impact of the Hidden Curriculum in School Genetics on Essentialist Conceptions of Race.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (4): 462–96.
Donovan, Brian M. 2016. “Framing the Genetics Curriculum for Social Justice.” Science Education 100 (3): 586616.
Du Bois, W. E. B. 1897. The Conservation of Races. Washington, DC: The American Negro Academy.
Gilroy, Paul. 1990. “One Nation under a Groove.” In Anatomy of Racism, edited by Goldberg, David Theo, 263–82. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gines, Kathryn. 2014. “A Critique of Postracialism.” Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race 11 (1): 7586.
Glasgow, Joshua. 2010a. A Theory of Race. New York: Routledge.
Glasgow, Joshua. 2010b. “Another Look at the Reality of Race, By Which I Mean Race.” In New Waves in Metaphysics, edited by Hazlett, Allan, 5471. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Graves, Joseph L. 2005. The Race Myth: Why We Pretend Race Exists in America. New York: Plume.
Hardimon, Michael. 2014. “The Concept of Socialrace.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 40 (1): 6990.
Hardimon, Michael. 2017. Rethinking Race: The Case for Deflationary Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?Noûs 34 (1): 3155.
Haslanger, Sally. 2012. Resisting Reality: Social Construction and Social Critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hochman, Adam. 2017. “Replacing Race: Interactive Constructionism about Racialized Groups.” Ergo 4 (3): 6192.
Hochman, Adam. 2018. “Racialization: A Defense of the Concept.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (8): 1245–62.
Ikuenobe, Polycarp. 2013. “Conceptualizing and Theorizing about the Idea of a ‘Post-Racial’ Era.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (4): 446–68.
Jacob, Günther. 2018. “Die Verdoppelung des Rassismus im Antirassismus.” Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 5 (1): 6185.
Jeffers, Chike. 2013. “The Cultural Theory of Race.” Ethics 123 (3): 403–26.
Ludwig, David. 2015. “Against the New Metaphysics of Race.” Philosophy of Science 82 (2): 244–65.
Ludwig, David. 2019. “How Race Travels: Relating Local and Global Ontologies of Race.” Philosophical Studies 81 (5), 1025–38.
Mallon, R. 2009. “Commentary on Joshua Glasgow’s a Theory of Race.” Symposia on Gender, Race and Philosophy 5 (2).
Meer, Nasar. 2013. “Racialization and Religion: Race, Culture and Difference in the Study of Antisemitism and Islamophobia.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (3): 385–98.
Mills, Charles. 2003. From Class to Race. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Msimang, Phila. 2019. “Racializing Races.” Ergo 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.001.
Monahan, Michael J. 2006. “Race, Colorblindness, and Continental Philosophy.” Philosophy Compass 1 (6): 547–63.
Montagu, Ashley. 1942. Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race. New York: Columbia University Press.
Morning, Ann. 2011. The Nature of Race: How Scientists Think and Teach about Human Difference. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mueller, Jon, and Coon, Heather. 2013. “Undergraduates’ Ability to Recognize Correlational and Causal Language Before and After Explicit Instruction.” Teaching of Psychology 40 (4): 288–93.
Neville, Helen A., Awad, Germine H., Brooks, James E., Flores, Michelle P., and Bluemel, Jamie. 2012. “Color-blind Racial Ideology: Theory, Training, and Measurement Implications in Psychology." American Psychologist 68 (6): 455–66.
Phelan, Jo C., Link, Bruce G., and Feldman, Naumi M.. 2013. “The Genomic Revolution and Beliefs about Essential Racial Differences: A Backdoor to Eugenics?American Sociological Review 78 (2): 167–91.
Plümecke, Tino. 2014. Rasse in der Ära der Genetik: Die Ordnung des Menschen in den Lebenswissenschaften. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Simon, Patrick. 2008. “Les statistiques, les sciences sociales françaises et les rapports sociaux ethniques et de « race ».” Revue française de sociologie 49 (1): 153–62.
Spencer, Quayshawn. 2014. “A Radical Solution to the Race Problem.” Philosophy of Science 81 (5): 1025–38.
Sussman, Robert W. 2014. The Myth of Race: The Troubling Persistence of an Unscientific Idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wekker, Gloria. 2016. White Innocence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Williams, Melissa J., and Eberhardt, Jennifer L.. 2008. “Biological Conceptions of Race and the Motivation to Cross Racial Boundaries.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (6): 1033–47.

Keywords

Understanding Race: The Case for Political Constructionism in Public Discourse

  • David Ludwig (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed