Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T04:45:24.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exercise performance in children and adolescents after the Ross procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2006

Bradley S. Marino
Affiliation:
Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, at the Cardiac Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Akron, Ohio, United States of America
Sara K. Pasquali
Affiliation:
Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, at the Cardiac Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Akron, Ohio, United States of America
Gil Wernovsky
Affiliation:
Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, at the Cardiac Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Akron, Ohio, United States of America
John R. Bockoven
Affiliation:
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron, Akron, Ohio, United States of America
Michael McBride
Affiliation:
Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, at the Cardiac Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Akron, Ohio, United States of America
Catherine J. Cho
Affiliation:
Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, at the Cardiac Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Akron, Ohio, United States of America
Thomas L. Spray
Affiliation:
Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, at the Cardiac Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Akron, Ohio, United States of America
Stephen M. Paridon
Affiliation:
Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiothoracic Surgery, at the Cardiac Center of The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and the Departments of Pediatrics and Surgery at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Akron, Ohio, United States of America

Abstract

Objectives: The Ross procedure is increasingly utilized in the treatment of aortic valvar disease in children and adolescents. Our purpose was to compare pre- and post-operative exercise state in this population. Methods: We included patients who underwent the Ross procedure at our institution between January, 1995, and December, 2003, and in whom we had performed pre- and post-operative exercise stress tests. We used a ramp bicycle protocol to measure consumption of oxygen and production of carbon dioxide. Cardiac output was estimated from effective pulmonary blood flow by the helium acetylene re-breathing technique. Results: We studied 26 patients, having a median age at surgery of 15.7 years, with a range from 7.5 to 24.1 years. The primary indication for surgery in two-thirds was combined aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Median time from the operation to the post-operative exercise stress test was 17.4 months, with a range from 6.7 to 30.2 months. There was a trend toward lower maximal consumption of oxygen after the procedure, at 36.3 plus or minus 7.6 millilitres per kilogram per minute (83.9% predicted) as opposed to 38.6 plus or minus 8.4 millilitres per kilogram per minute (88.5% predicted, p equal to 0.06). Patients after the procedure, however, had significantly increased adiposity, so that there was no difference in maximal consumption of oxygen indexed to ideal body weight before and after the operation. In 20 of the patients, aerobic capacity improved or was stable after the operation. There was no post-operative chronotropic impairment. Conclusions: In the majority of patients following the Ross procedure, exercise performance is stable and within the normal range of a healthy age and sex matched population, despite sedentary lifestyles and increased adiposity.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ross DN. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 1967; 2: 956958.Google Scholar
Elkins RC, Knott-Craig CJ, Ward KE, McCue C, Lane MM. Pulmonary autograft in children: realized growth potential. Ann Thorac Surg 1994; 57: 13871394.Google Scholar
Elkins RC, Knott-Craig CJ, Randolph JD, et al. Medium term follow-up of pulmonary autograft replacement of aortic valves in children. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994; 8: 379383.Google Scholar
Gerosa G, McKay R, Ross DN. Replacement of the aortic valve root with a pulmonary autograft in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 51: 424429.Google Scholar
Elkins RC, Santangelo KL, Randolph JD, et al. Pulmonary autograft replacement in children: the ideal solution? Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 216: 363371.Google Scholar
Kouchoukos NT, Davila-Roman VG, Spray TL, Murphy SF, Perrillo JB. Replacement of the aortic root with a pulmonary autograft in children and young adults with aortic valve disease. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 16.Google Scholar
Schoof PH, Cromme-Dijkhuis AH, Bogers JJC, et al. Aortic root replacement with pulmonary autograft in children. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994; 107: 367373.Google Scholar
Reddy VM, Rajasinghe HA, McElhinney DB, et al. Extending the limits of the Ross procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1995; 60: S600S603.Google Scholar
Reddy VM, Rajasinghe HA, Teitel DF, Hanley FL. Atrioventriculoplasty with the pulmonary autograft: The “Ross-Konno” procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 158167.Google Scholar
Starnes VA, Luciani GB, Wells WJ, Allen RB, Lewis AB. Aortic root replacement with the pulmonary autograft in children with complex left heart obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 1996; 62: 442449.Google Scholar
Hvass U, Chatel D, Calliani J, Pansard Y. Relief of complex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with pulmonary autografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995; 109: 1019.Google Scholar
Marino BS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, Bockoven JR, Godinez RI, Spray TL. Early results of the Ross procedure in simple and complex left heart disease. Circulation 1999; 100 (Suppl II): II-162II-166.Google Scholar
Rubay JE, Shango P, Clement S, et al. Ross procedure in congenital patients: results and left ventricular function. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 11: 9299.Google Scholar
Jones TK, Lupinetti FM. Comparison of the Ross procedure and aortic valve allografts in children. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S170S173.Google Scholar
Oury JH, Doty DB, Oswalt JD, Knapp JF, Mackey SK, Duran CM. Cardiopulmonary response to maximal exercise in young athletes following the Ross Procedure. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66: S153S154.Google Scholar
Porter GF, Skillington PD, Bjorksten AR, Morgan JG, Yapanis AG, Grigg LE. Exercise hemodynamic performance of the pulmonary autograft following the Ross procedure. J Heart Valve Dis 1999; 8: 516521.Google Scholar
Da Costa F, Haggi H, Pinton R, Lenke W, Adam E, Costa IS. Rest and exercise hemodynamics after the Ross procedure: an echocardiographic study. J Card Surg 1998; 13: 177185.Google Scholar
Phillips JR, Daniels CJ, Orsinelli DA, et al. Valvular hemodynamics and arrhythmias with exercise following the Ross procedure. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 577583.Google Scholar
Polgar G, Promadhat V: Pulmonary function in children techniques and standards. W.B. Saunders, 1971, 254.
Larson RL, Barber G, Heise CT, August CS. Exercise assessment of cardiac function in children and young adults before and after bone marrow transplantation. Pediatrics 1992; 89: 722729.Google Scholar
Cooper DM, Weile-Ravell D, Whipp BJ, Wasserman K. Aerobic parameters of exercise as a function of body size during growth in children. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol 1984; 56: 628634.Google Scholar
Jenkins KJ, Hanley FL, Colan SD, Mayer Jr JE, Castaneda AR, Wernovsky G. Function of the anatomic pulmonary valve in the systemic circulation. Circulation 1991; 84 (Suppl III): III-173II-179.Google Scholar
Spray TL. Technique of pulmonary autograft aortic valve replacement in children (The Ross Procedure). Sem Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 1: 165177.Google Scholar
Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Briand M, Laforest I, Cartier P. Hemodynamic performance during maximum exercise in adult patients with the Ross operation and comparison with normal controls and patients with aortic bioprostheses. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 982988.Google Scholar
Christos SC, Katch V, Crowley DC, Eakin BL, Lindauer AL, Beekman RH. Hemodynamic response to upright exercise of adolescent cardiac transplant recipients. J Pediatr 1992; 121: 312316.Google Scholar
Pastore E, Turchetta A, Attias L, et al. Cardiorespiratory functional assessment after pediatric heart transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2001; 5: 425429.Google Scholar
Mahle WT, McBride MG, Paridon SM. Exercise performance in Tetralogy of Fallot: The impact of primary complete repair in infancy. Pediatr Cardiol 2002; 23: 224229.Google Scholar
Mahle WT, McBride MG, Paridon SM. Exercise performance after the arterial switch operation for D-Transposition of the great arteries. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 753758.Google Scholar