Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-hw7sx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T22:40:58.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new approach of three-dimensional guidance in paediatric cath lab: segmented and tessellated heart models for cardiovascular interventions in CHD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2018

Nicole Ehret ,
Muhannad Alkassar ,
Sven Dittrich ,
Robert Cesnjevar ,
André Rüffer ,
Michael Uder ,
Oliver Rompel ,
Matthias Hammon  and
Martin Glöckler
Nicole Ehret*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Muhannad Alkassar
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Sven Dittrich
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Robert Cesnjevar
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Heart Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
André Rüffer
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Heart Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Michael Uder
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Oliver Rompel
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Matthias Hammon
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
Martin Glöckler
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: N. Ehret, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital Erlangen, Loschgestrasse 15, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany. Tel: +49 9131 8533750; Fax: +49 9131 8535987; E-mail: nicole.ehret@nefkom.net
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Optimal imaging is essential for catheter-based interventions in CHD. The three-dimensional models in volume-rendering technique currently in use are not standardised. This paper investigates the feasibility and impact of novel three-dimensional guidance with segmented and tessellated three-dimensional heart models in catheterisation of CHD. In addition, a nearly radiation-free two- to three-dimensional registration and a biplane overlay were used.

Methods and results

We analysed 60 consecutive cases in which segmented tessellated three-dimensional heart models were merged with live fluoroscopy images and aligned using the tracheal bifurcation as a fiducial mark. The models were generated from previous MRI or CT by dedicated medical software. We chose the stereo-lithography format, as this promises advantage over volume-rendering-technique models regarding visualisation. Prospects, potential benefits, and accuracy of the two- to three-dimensional registration were rated separately by two paediatric interventionalists on a five-point Likert scale. Fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, and contrast dye consumption were evaluated. Over a 10-month study period, two- to three-dimensional image fusion was applied to 60 out of 354 cases. Of the 60 catheterisations, 73.3% were performed in the context of interventions. The accuracy of two- to three-dimensional registration was sufficient in all cases. Three-dimensional guidance was rated superior to conventional biplane imaging in all 60 cases. We registered significantly smaller amounts of used contrast dye (p<0.01), lower levels of radiation dose (p<0.02), and less fluoroscopy time (p<0.01) during interventions concerning the aortic arch compared with a control group.

Conclusions

Two- to three-dimensional image fusion can be applied successfully in most catheter-based interventions of CHD. Meshes in stereo-lithography format are accurate and base for standardised and reproducible three-dimensional models.

Keywords

3D guidanceCHDcatheterisationTriangulated heart models

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , May 2018 , pp. 661 - 667
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Feltes, TF, Bacha, E, Beekman, RH 3rd, et al. Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123: 2607–2652.Google Scholar
2. Fagan, T, Kay, J, Carroll, J, Neubauer, A. 3-D guidance of complex pulmonary artery stent placement using reconstructed rotational angiography with live overlay. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 79: 414–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Glatz, AC, Zhu, X, Gillespie, MJ, Hanna, BD, Rome, JJ. Use of angiographic CT imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for congenital heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 1149–1157.Google Scholar
4. Glockler, M, Halbfaß, J, Koch, A, Achenbach, S, Dittrich, S. Multimodality 3D-roadmap for cardiovascular interventions in congenital heart disease--a single-center, retrospective analysis of 78 cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 82: 436–442.Google Scholar
5. Glockler, M, Koch, A, Greim, V, et al. The value of flat-detector computed tomography during catheterisation of congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2511–2520.Google Scholar
6. Gutierrez, LF, Silva, R, Ozturk, C, et al. Technology preview: X-ray fused with magnetic resonance during invasive cardiovascular procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 773–782.Google Scholar
7. Gutleben, KJ, Nolker, G, Ritscher, G, et al. Three-dimensional coronary sinus reconstruction-guided left ventricular lead implantation based on intraprocedural rotational angiography: a novel imaging modality in cardiac resynchronization device implantation. Europace 2011; 13: 675–682.Google Scholar
8. Tomkowiak, MT, Klein, AJ, Vigen, KK, et al. Targeted transendocardial therapeutic delivery guided by MRI-x-ray image fusion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 468–478.Google Scholar
9. Abu Hazeem, AA, Dori, Y, Whitehead, KK, et al. X-ray magnetic resonance fusion modality may reduce radiation exposure and contrast dose in diagnostic cardiac catheterization of congenital heart disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 84: 795–800.Google Scholar
10. Goreczny, S, Dryzek, P, Morgan, GJ, Lukaszewski, M, Moll, JA, Moszura, T. Novel three-dimensional image fusion software to facilitate guidance of complex cardiac catheterization : 3D image fusion for interventions in CHD. Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38: 1133–1142.Google Scholar
11. Likert, R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932; 22: 1–55.Google Scholar
12. Stenger, A, Dittrich, S, Glockler, M. Three-dimensional rotational angiography in the pediatric cath lab: optimizing aortic interventions. Pediatr Cardiol 2016; 37: 528–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Stangenberg, L, Shuja, F, Carelsen, B, Elenbaas, T, Wyers, MC, Schermerhorn, ML. A novel tool for three-dimensional roadmapping reduces radiation exposure and contrast agent dose in complex endovascular interventions. J Vasc Surg 2015; 62: 448–455.Google Scholar
14. Goreczny, S, Dryzek, P, Moszura, T. Use of pre-intervention imaging with a novel image fusion software for guidance of cardiac catheterisation in a patient with pulmonary atresia and major aortopulmonary collaterals. Cardiol Young 2016; 26: 1438–1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Hinrichs, JB, Renne, J, Hoeper, MM, Olsson, KM, Wacker, FK, Meyer, BC. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty: applicability of C-Arm CT for procedure guidance. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 4064–4071.Google Scholar
16. Bacher, K, Bogaert, E, Lapere, R, De Wolf, D, Thierens, H. Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Circulation 2005; 111: 83–89.Google Scholar
17. Cody, DD. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in CT. Image processing in CT. Radiographics 2002; 22: 1255–1268.Google Scholar
18. Hammon, M, Rompel, O, Seuss, H, et al. Accuracy and specific value of cardiovascular 3D-models in pediatric CT-angiography. Pediatr Cardiol 2017; 38: 1540–1547.Google Scholar
19. Fagan, TE, Truong, UT, Jone, PN, et al. Multimodality 3-dimensional image integration for congenital cardiac catheterization. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J 2014; 10: 68–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Dori, Y, Sarmiento, M, Glatz, AC, et al. X-ray magnetic resonance fusion to internal markers and utility in congenital heart disease catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 415–424.Google Scholar