Skip to main content
×
Home

Challenges and successes of recruitment in the “angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in infants with single ventricle trial” of the Pediatric Heart Network

  • Nancy A. Pike (a1), Victoria Pemberton (a2), Kerstin Allen (a3), Jeffrey P. Jacobs (a4), Daphne T. Hsu (a5), Alan B. Lewis (a6), Nancy Ghanayem (a7), Linda Lambert (a8), Kari Crawford (a9), Teresa Atz (a10), Rosalind Korsin (a11), Mingfen Xu (a12), Chitra Ravishankar (a13), James Cnota (a14) and Gail D. Pearson (a2)...
Abstract
Abstract Objectives

Identify trends of enrolment and key challenges when recruiting infants with complex cardiac diseases into a multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled drug trial and assess the impact of efforts to share successful strategies on enrolment of subjects.

Methods

Rates of screening, eligibility, consent, and randomisation were determined for three consecutive periods of time. Sites collectively addressed barriers to recruitment and shared successful strategies resulting in the Inventory of Best Recruiting Practices. Study teams detailed institutional practices of recruitment in post-trial surveys that were compared with strategies of enrolment initially proposed in the Inventory.

Results

The number of screened patients increased by 30% between the Initial Period and the Intermediate Period (p = 0.007), whereas eligibility decreased slightly by 7%. Of those eligible for entry into the study, the rate of consent increased by 42% (p = 0.025) and randomisation increased by 71% (p = 0.10). During the Final Period, after launch of a competing trial, fewer patients were screened (−14%, p = 0.06), consented (−19%, p = 0.12), and randomised (−34%, p = 0.012). Practices of recruitment in the post-trial survey closely mirrored those in the Inventory.

Conclusions

Early identification and sharing of best strategies of recruitment among all recruiting sites can be effective in increasing recruitment of critically ill infants with congenital cardiac disease and possibly other populations. Strategies of recruitment should focus on those that build relationships with families and create partnerships with the medical providers who care for them. Competing studies pose challenges for enrolment in trials, but fostering trusting relationships with families can result in successful enrolment into multiple studies.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Dr N. Pike, PhD, RN, UCLA School of Nursing, 700 Tiverton Avenue, Factor Building Room no. 3-938, Los Angeles, California 90095, United States of America. Tel: 310 206 3683; Fax: 310 267 0413; E-mail: npike@sonnet.ucla.edu
References
Hide All
1. Silverman WA. The future of clinical experimentation in neonatal medicine. Pediatrics 1994; 94: 932938.
2. Caldwell PHY, Murphy SB, Butow PN, Craig JC. Clinical trials in children. Lancet 2004; 364: 803811.
3. Roush SW, Murphy TV, and the Vaccine-Preventable Disease Table Working Group. Historical comparisons of morbidity and mortality for vaccine-preventable diseases in the United States. JAMA 2007; 298: 21552163.
4. Hobar JD, Soll RF, Sutherland JM, et al. A multicenter randomized, placebo-controlled trial of surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 959965.
5. Smith MA, Seibel NL, Altekruse SF, et al. Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 26252634.
6. Caldwell PH, Butow PN, Craig JC. Pediatricians’ attitudes toward randomized controlled trials involving children. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 798803.
7. Singhal N, Oberle K, Darwish A, Burgess E. Attitudes of health-care providers toward research in newborn babies. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 775782.
8. Harris Interactive Poll. Only a quarter (25%) of US adults would consider allowing a child of theirs to participate in a clinical research study. Health Care News 2004; 4: 18.
9. Pemberton VL, Pearson GD. No more hand-me-downs: research designed for children. Monitor 2009; 12: 5560.
10. Sullivan J. Subject recruitment and retention: barriers to success, Appl Clin Trials, 2004. Available at: http://appliedclinicaltrialsonline.findpharma.com/appliedclinicaltrials/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=89608
11. Chlan L, Guttormson J, Tracy MF, Lindstrom Brener K. Strategies for overcoming site and recruitment challenges in research studies based in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care 2009; 18: 410417.
12. Knox CA, Burkhart PV. Issues related to children participating in clinical research. J Pediatr Nurs 2007; 22: 310318.
13. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S. Participation of children in clinical trial research: factors that influence a parent's decision to consent. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 819825.
14. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S. Factors that influence parents’ assessments of the risks and benefits of research involving their children. Pediatrics 2004; 113: 727732.
15. Hoehn KS, Wernovsky G, Rychik J, et al. What factors are important to parent making decisions about neonatal research? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: 267269.
16. Nathan AT, Hoehn KS, Ittenbach RF, et al. Assessment of parental decision-making in neonatal cardiac research: a pilot study. J Med Ethics 2010; 36: 106110.
17. Rothmier JD, Lasley MV, Shapiro GG. Factors influencing parent consent in pediatric clinical research. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 10371041.
18. Vollmer WM. Recruiting children and their families into clinical trials: a case study. Control Clin Trials 1992; 13: 315320.
19. McKechnie L, Gill AB. Consent for neonatal research. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006; 91: F374F376.
20. Fries JF, Krishnan E. Equipoise, design bias, and randomized controlled trials: the elusive ethic of new drug development. Arthritis Res Ther 2004; 6: R250R255.
21. Mahony L, Sleeper LA, Anderson PAW, et al. The Pediatric Heart Network: a primer for the conduction of multicenter studies in children with congenital and acquired heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2006; 27: 191198.
22. Anderson PAW, Sleeper LA, Mahony L, et al. Contemporary outcomes after the Fontan procedure: a Pediatric Heart Network multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 8598.
23. Newburger J, Sleeper LA, McCrindle B, et al. Randomized trial of pulse steroid therapy in Kawasaki Disease. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 663675.
24. Hsu DT, Mital S, Ravishankar C, et al. Rationale and design of a trial of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in infants with single ventricle. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 3745.
25. Hsu DT, Zak V, Mahony L, et al. Enalapril in infants with single ventricle: results of a multicenter randomized trial. Circulation 2010; 122: 333340.
26. Ohye RG, Gaynor JW, Ghanayem NS, et al. Design and rationale of a randomized trial comparing the Blalock–Taussig and right ventricle-pulmonary artery shunts in the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008; 136: 968975.
27. Ohye RG, Sleeper LA, Mahony L, et al. Comparison of shunt types in the Norwood procedure for single-ventricle lesions. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 19801992.
28. Hunninghake DB, Darby CA, Probstfield JL. Recruitment experience in clinical trials: literature summary and annotated bibliography. Control Clin Trials 1987; 8: 6S30S.
29. Dalen J, Annett RD, Brody JL, Perryman ML. Influences upon pediatricians’ willingness to refer patients to clinical research. Open Access J Clin Trials 2010; 2: 2328.
30. Jenkins V, Fallowfield L. Reasons for accepting or declining to participate in randomized clinical trials for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 17831788.
31. Getz KA. Conversations with study volunteers, Appl Clin Trials, 2010. Available at: http://appliedclinicaltrialsonline.findpharma.com/appliedclinicaltrials/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=668513.
32. Atz AM, Travison TG, Williams IA, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and risk factors for perioperative death in neonates with single right ventricle and systemic outflow tract obstruction: screening data from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140: 12451250.
33. Golec L, Gibbins S, Dunn MS, Hebert P. Informed consent in the NICU setting: an ethically optimal model for research solicitation. J Perinatol 2004; 24: 783791.
34. Children and clinical studies: no more hand-me-down-research. Retrieved June 12, 2011, from http://www.ChildrenandClinicalStudies.nhlbi.nih.gov
35. Hoffman TM, Taeed R, Niles JP, McMillin MA, Perkins LA, Feltes TF. Parental factors impacting the enrollment of children in cardiac critical care clinical trials. Pediatr Cardiol 2007; 28: 167171.
36. Varma S, Jenkins T, Wendler D. How do children and parents make decisions about pediatric clinical research? J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2008; 30: 823828.
37. Rempel GR, Cender LM, Lynam MJ, Sandor GG, Farguharson D. Parents’ perspectives on decision making after antenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33: 6470.
38. Morley CJ, Lau R, Davis PG, Morse C. What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90: F225F228.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cardiology in the Young
  • ISSN: 1047-9511
  • EISSN: 1467-1107
  • URL: /core/journals/cardiology-in-the-young
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 7 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.