Skip to main content

Results of balloon dilatation of stenotic homografts in pulmonary position in children and young adults

  • Robin A. Bertels (a1), Michiel Dalinghaus (a2), Maarten Witsenburg (a2), Aagje Nijveld (a3), Ad J. J. C. Bogers (a4), Folkert Meijboom (a1), Anton van Oort (a1) and Ronald Tanke (a1)...

To evaluate the results of balloon dilatation of stenotic homografts in children, adolescents, and young adults and to identify factors that might influence or predict the effect of the dilatation.


Homografts are widely used in congenital cardiac surgery; however, the longevity remains a problem mostly because of stenosis in the homograft. The effect of treatment by balloon dilatation is unclear.


In a retrospective study, the effect of balloon dilatation was determined by the percentage of reduction of the peak systolic pressure gradient over the homograft during catheterisation and the postponement of re-intervention or replacement of the homograft in months. Successful dilatations – defined in this study as a reduction of more than 33% and postponement of more than 18 months – were compared with unsuccessful dilatations in search of factors influencing or predicting the results.


The mean reduction of the peak systolic pressure gradient was 30% in 40 procedures. Re-intervention or replacement of the homograft was postponed by a mean of 19 months. In all, 14 balloon dilatations (35%) were successful; the mean reduction was 49% and the mean postponement was 34 months. The time since homograft implantation, the presence of calcification, the homograft/balloon ratio, and the pressure applied during dilatation all tended to correlate with outcome, but were not statistically significant.


Balloon dilatation is able to reduce the peak systolic pressure gradient over homografts in a subgroup of patients and can be of clinical significance to postpone re-intervention or pulmonary valve replacement.

Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Dr R. A. Bertels, MD, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands. Tel: +31 715262835; Fax: +31 715248110; E-mail:
Hide All

Currently employed: Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Currently employed: Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Hide All
1.Perron J, Moran AM, Gauvreau K, del Nido PJ, Mayer JE Jr, Jonas RA. Valved homograft conduit repair of the right heart in early infancy. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 542548.
2.Powell AJ, Lock JE, Keane JF, Perry SB. Prolongation of RV-PA conduit life span by percutaneous stent implantation. Intermediate-term results. Circulation 1995; 92: 32823288.
3.Tatebe S, Nagakura S, Boyle EM Jr, Duncan BW. Right ventricle to pulmonary artery reconstruction using a valved homograft. Circ J 2003; 67: 906912.
4.Oosterhof T, Meijboom FJ, Vliegen HW, et al. . Long-term follow-up of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 14781484.
5.Hanley FL. Management of the congenitally abnormal right ventricular outflow tract – what is the right approach? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 119: 13.
6.Yuan SM, Mishaly D, Shinfeld A, Raanani E. Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: valved conduit of choice and clinical outcomes. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2008; 9: 327337.
7.Bohm JO. Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents? Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 940947.
8.Zeevi B, Keane JF, Perry SB, Lock JE. Balloon dilation of postoperative right ventricular outflow obstructions. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 401408.
9.Nordmeyer J, Coats L, Bonhoeffer P. Current experience with percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 18: 122125.
10.Sohn S, Kashani IA, Rothman A. Partial and transient relief of conduit obstruction by low-pressure balloon dilation in patients with congenital heart disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995; 34: 3540.
11.Waldman JD, Schoen FJ, Kirkpatrick SE, Mathewson JW, George L, Lamberti JJ. Balloon dilatation of porcine bioprosthetic valves in the pulmonary position. Circulation 1987; 76: 109114.
12.Sanatani S, Potts JE, Human DG, Sandor GG, Patterson MW, Gordon Culham JA. Balloon angioplasty of right ventricular outflow tract conduits. Pediatr Cardiol 2001; 22: 228232.
13.Lloyd TR, Marvin WJ Jr, Mahoney LT, Lauer RM. Balloon dilation valvuloplasty of bioprosthetic valves in extracardiac conduits. Am Heart J 1987; 114: 268274.
14.Sreeram N, Hutter P, Silove E. Sustained high pressure double balloon angioplasty of calcified conduits. Heart 1999; 81: 162165.
15.Aggarwal S, Garekar S, Forbes TJ, Turner DR. Is stent placement effective for palliation of right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit stenosis? J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49: 480484.
16.Peng LF, McElhinney DB, Nugent AW, et al. . Endovascular stenting of obstructed right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits: a 15-year experience. Circulation 2006; 113: 25982605.
17.Nordmeyer J, Coats L, Lurz P, et al. . Percutaneous pulmonary valve-in-valve implantation: a successful treatment concept for early device failure. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 810815.
18.Lurz P, Bonhoeffer P, Taylor AM. Percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation: an update. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009; 7: 823833.
19.Bokenkamp R, Hazekamp MG, Schalij MJ, Clur SA, Ottenkamp J, Blom NA. Percutaneous implantation of a pulmonary valve in 3 children with surgically corrected cardiac anomalies. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2007; 151: 25802585.
20.Boudjemline Y, Laborde F, Pineau E, et al. . Expandable right ventricular-to-pulmonary artery conduit: an animal study. Pediatr Res 2006; 59: 773777.
21.Clur SA, Baan J, Lurz P, Bonhoeffer P, Ottenkamp J. Percutaneous implantation of a pulmonary valve: an illustrative case. Neth Heart J 2007; 15: 2730.
22.Helbing WA, Bosch HG, Maliepaard C, et al. . Comparison of echocardiographic methods with magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of right ventricular function in children. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 589594.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Cardiology in the Young
  • ISSN: 1047-9511
  • EISSN: 1467-1107
  • URL: /core/journals/cardiology-in-the-young
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 19 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 101 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.