No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Study groups as professional development for advanced caseworkers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 February 2016
Abstract
During 2003-2005, Anglicare Victoria conducted study groups for their advanced caseworkers. This program was developed in consultation with senior staff within the context of Anglicare Victoria’s Services Practices Manual, including Theoretical Frameworks. It aimed to provide senior practitioners with peer support, education and discussion.
The study group model was a collaborative approach using adult teaching principles and strategies. Central to each session was a case presentation from one of the participants which provided an opportunity to integrate learning with theory and practice. A training model of the study group is presented.
Evaluation indicated that the study group reduced participants’ isolation, increased their confidence in engaging family members, including fathers, and broadened their conceptualisation of family problems. Learnings and proposed changes to future study groups are identified.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007
References
Adams, R., Dominelli, L. & Payne, M. (1998) Social work: Themes, issues and critical debates, Macmillan, Houndmills.Google Scholar
Allan, J. (2003) ‘Loss and grief: Weaving together the personal and the political’, in Allan, J., Pease, B. & Briskman, L. (eds.), Critical social work theory and practice, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards, pp. 170–184.Google Scholar
Anglicare Case Management Model (Rothman’s Model, modified April 2003).Google Scholar
Berg, I.. (1994) Family based services: A solution-focused approach, W.W. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (1997) The challenge of problem-based learning, 2nd edn, Kogan Page, London.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (1999) ‘Bowen family systems theory and practice: Illustration and critique’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 94–103.Google Scholar
Cleak, H. & Serr, K. (1998) ‘Case management in action: An examination of two cases in the area of alcohol related brain damage’, Australian Social Work, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 33–38.Google Scholar
Condonis, M., Paroissien, K. & Aldrich, B. (1990) The mutual-help group: A therapeutic program for women who have been abused: A reference manual, Redfern Legal Centre Publishing, Chippendale.Google Scholar
Costello, S. (2003) ‘Reconstructing social work practices with families’, in Allan, J., Pease, B. & Briskman, L. (eds.), Critical social work theory and practice, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.Google Scholar
Costello, S. (2004) ‘Valuing the complexity of direct social work practice in an era of managerialism’, Women in Welfare Education, 7, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
Duch, J., Grolh, E. & Allen, D. (eds.) (2001) The power of problem-based learning: A practical ‘how to’ for teaching undergraduate courses in any discipline, Stirling, Virginia.Google Scholar
Elliott, B., Mulroney, L. & O’Neil, D. (2000) Promoting family change: The optimism factor, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.Google Scholar
Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. & Natemeyer, W. (1979) Situational leadership, power-base perceptions, and maturity levels, California Center for Leadership Studies.Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2001) ‘Voices from the front line: State social workers and the New Labour’, British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 31, pp. 547–562.Google Scholar
Kadushin, A. (1985). Supervision in social work, 2nd edn, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kagan, R. & Schlosberg, S. (1989) Families in perpetual crisis, WW Norton & Co., New York.Google Scholar
Knowles, M. (1970) The modern practice of adult education: An autobiographical journey, Jossey-Bass, New York.Google Scholar
Lundy, C. (2004) Social work and social justice: A structural approach to practice, Broadview Press, Canada.Google Scholar
McMahon, M. (2002) ‘Some supervision practicalities’, in McMahon, M. & Patton, W. (eds), Supervision in the helping professions: A practical approach, Pearson Education, Australia.Google Scholar
Monk, G., Winslade, J., Crocket, K. & Epston, D. (eds) (1997) Narrative therapy in practice:The archaeology of hope, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Morgan, A. (2000) What is narrative therapy? An easy-to-read introduction, Dulwich Centre Publications, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Osmond, J. & O’Connor, I. (2006) ‘Use of theory and research in social work practice: Implications for knowledge-based practice’, Australian Social Work, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 5–19.Google Scholar
Pease, B. & Fook, J. (eds.) (1999) Transforming social work practice: Post modern critical perspectives, Allen & Unwin, St Leonards.Google Scholar
Roth, S. & Epston, D. (1996) ‘Externalizing conversations: An exercise’, Journal of Systemic Therapies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 5–12.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (1998) Case management: Integrating individual and community practice, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
Selekman, M.D. (1997) Solution-focused therapy with children: Harnessing family strengths for systemic change. Chapter 3, The Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. & Goddard, C. (2002) In the firing line: Violence and power in child protection work, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Vella, J. (1994) Learning to listen, learning to teach: The power of developing dialogue in educating adults, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Waddell, M. (1989) ‘Living in two worlds: Psychodynamic theory and social work practice’, Free Associations, 15. pp. 11–35.Google Scholar
White, M. (1986) ‘Negative explanation, restraint & double description: A template for family therapy’, Family Process, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 169–84.Google Scholar
White, M. (1988) ‘Saying hullo again: The incorporation of the lost relationship in the resolution of grief’, Dulwich Centre Newsletter, Spring, pp. 7–11.Google Scholar