Skip to main content Accessibility help

From Institutional Interaction to Institutional Integration: The National Supervisory Commission and China's New Anti-corruption Model

  • Li Li (a1) and Peng Wang (a2)


How does the establishment of the National Supervisory Commission affect China's capacity to curb corruption? Using published materials and fieldwork data, this article addresses this question by comparing the newly established anti-corruption agency with the previous dual-track system. It first examines the previous system by focusing on four dimensions of the interaction between the Commission for Discipline Inspection (CDI) and the People's Procuratorate: complementarity, convergence, competition and conflict. Although the CDI and the procuratorate compensated for each other's deficiencies, competition and conflicts between the two institutions were rife, reducing the efficiency of China's anti-corruption work. The article then investigates what impact the establishment of the National Supervisory Commission has had on China's capacity to combat corruption. This new model strengthens the Party's capacity to curb corruption, and the focus of the anti-corruption work has shifted from punishment to prevention, but the Party still needs to resolve three types of unbalanced power relations: between supervision, prosecution and trial; between central and local authorities; and between the state and citizens.

国家监察委员会的成立如何影响中国政府腐败治理的能力?基于公开资料和实地调研数据, 本文通过探讨纪委与检察院这两个最为重要的反腐败机构之间的关系来回答这个问题。文章首先回顾了国家监察委员会成立之前, 以纪委和检察院作为反腐败主要机构之间的复杂的互动关系。文章将其概括为四个维度, 即互补, 融合, 竞争和冲突。基于上述四种关系, 文章发现虽然纪委和检察院在一定程度上存在互补关系, 可以弥补彼此的不足, 但两个机构在反腐败工作中仍然存在竞争和冲突, 因而在一定程度上降低了中国反腐败工作的效率, 这也成为理解国家监察委员会成立的逻辑起点。之后, 文章进一步讨论了新组建的国家监察委员会对中国反腐工作的影响。在审慎观察的基础上, 本研究认为新成立的国家监察委员会加强了执政党治理腐败的能力, 反腐工作的重点也逐渐从惩罚腐败转向预防腐败, 但执政党仍需要谨慎处理三种不平衡的权力关系:监察机关与审判机关、检察机关的关系; 中央和地方的关系; 以及国家权力与公民权利的关系, 这也是对正在行进中的国家监察体制改革进行持续观察的重要方向。


Corresponding author

Email: (corresponding author)


Hide All
Boyer, Robert. 2005. “Coherence, diversity, and the evolution of capitalisms – the institutional complementarity hypothesis.” Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 2(1), 4380.
Cai, Yongshun. 2014. State and Agents in China: Disciplining Government Officials. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Crouch, Colin, Streeck, Wolfgang, Boyer, Robert, Amable, Bruno, Hall, Peter A. and Jackson, Gregory. 2005. “Dialogue on ‘institutional complementarity and political economy’.” Socio-Economic Review 3(2), 359382.
Deng, Jinting. 2018. “The National Supervision Commission: a new anti-corruption model in China.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 52, 5873.
Fu, Hualing. 2015. “Wielding the sword: President Xi's new anti-corruption campaign.” In Rose-Ackerman, Susan and Lagunes, Paul Felipe (eds.), Greed, Corruption, and the Modern State: Essay in Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 134–35.
Fu, Hualing. 2016. “China's striking anti-corruption adventure: a political journey towards the rule of law?” In Chen, Weitseng (ed.), The Beijing Consensus? How China Has Changed the Western Ideas of Law and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249274.
He, Zengke. 2017. “Jiancha tizhi gaige yu fanfu hongli(The supervisory commission reform and anti-corruption dividend). People's Tribune (17), 106108.
Keliher, Macabe, and Wu, Hsinchao. 2016. “Corruption, anticorruption, and the transformation of political culture in contemporary China.” The Journal of Asian Studies 75(1), 518.
Li, Fenfei, and Deng, Jinting. 2016a. “The limits of the arbitrariness in anticorruption by China's local Party discipline inspection committees.” Journal of Contemporary China 25(97), 7590.
Li, Fenfei, and Deng, Jinting. 2016b. “The power and the misuse of power by China's local procuratorates in anticorruption.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 45, 125.
Li, Hui, Gong, Ting and Xiao, Hanyu. 2016. “The perception of anti-corruption efficacy in China: an empirical analysis.” Social Indicators Research 125(3), 885903.
Li, Li, Lien, Donald, Wu, Yiping and Zhao, Yang. 2017. “Enforcement and political power in anticorruption – evidence from China.” World Development 98, 133147.
Liu, Xiaohong. 2017. “The dual dilemma of the supervisory committee's investigation power and its legal path.” Legal Form 32(6), 515.
Manion, Melanie. 2016. “Taking China's anticorruption campaign seriously.” Economic and Political Studies 4(1), 318.
Quah, J.S.T. 2006. National Integrity System: Transparency International Regional Overview Report – East and Southeast Asia. Berlin: Transparency International.
Tong, Zhiwei. 2017a. “Guojia jiancha lifa yu'an rengxu zhuoli wanshan(Great efforts are still needed to improve the plan of drafting the National Supervision Law). Political Science and Law (10), 6676.
Tong, Zhiwei. 2017b. “Dui jiancha weiyuanhui zishen de jiandu zhiyue heyi qianghua(How to strengthen the supervision over the supervisory commission). Law Review (1), 18.
Wang, Buyuan. 2008. “Lun woguo jiancha jiguan fantan gongzuo de susong li'nian” (On China's procuratorate's anti-corruption work). Master's thesis, University of Political Science and Law, PRC.
Wang, Peng. 2017. The Chinese Mafia: Organized Crime, Corruption, and Extra-legal Protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wedeman, Andrew. 2012. Double Paradox: Rapid Growth and Rising Corruption in China. New York: Cornell University Press.
Zhan, Jing V., and Jiangnan, Zhu. 2016. “Explaining China's selective anticorruption efforts in the reform era.” Paper presented at 2016 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. Available at SSRN:
Zhang, Xiang, and Lai, Weineng. 2017. “Jiben quanli zuowei guojia quanli peizhi de xiaoji guifan(Basic rights as passive norms for regulating the allocation of state power). Science of Law (6), 3040.
Zhao, Bingzhi. 2013. “Lun woguo fanfubai xingshi fazhide wanshan(On the improvement of rule of law for anti-corruption in China). Dangdai faxue 27(3), 4958.
Zhu, Jiangnan, Huang, Huang and Zhang, Dong. 2017. “Big tigers, big data: learning social reactions to China's anti-corruption campaign through online feedback.” Public Administration Review.


From Institutional Interaction to Institutional Integration: The National Supervisory Commission and China's New Anti-corruption Model

  • Li Li (a1) and Peng Wang (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed