Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China

  • Jessica C. Teets (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

In this article, I analyse civil society development in China using examples from Beijing to demonstrate the causal role of local officials' ideas about these groups during the last 20 years. I argue that the decentralization of public welfare and the linkage of promotion to the delivery of these goods supported the idea of local government–civil society collaboration. This idea was undermined by international examples of civil society opposing authoritarianism and the strength of the state-led development model after the 2008 economic crisis. I find growing convergence on a new model of state–society relationship that I call “consultative authoritarianism,” which encourages the simultaneous expansion of a fairly autonomous civil society and the development of more indirect tools of state control. This model challenges the conventional wisdom that an operationally autonomous civil society cannot exist inside authoritarian regimes and that the presence of civil society is an indicator of democratization.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Mark Blyth . 1997. “Any more bright ideas? The ideational turn of comparative political economy.” Comparative Politics 29(1), 229250.

Hongbin Cai , and Daniel Treisman . 2002. “State corroding federalism.” Journal of Public Economics 88, 819843.

Heath Chamberlain . 1993. “On the search for civil society in China.” Modern China 19, 199215.

Larry Diamond . 1994. “Rethinking civil society: toward democratic consolidation.” Journal of Democracy 5, 418.

Kenneth Foster . 2001. “Associations in the embrace of an authoritarian state: state domination of society?Studies in Comparative International Development 35: 84109.

Peter Ho . 2001. “Greening without conflict? Environmentalism, NGOs and civil society in China.” Development and Change 32, 893921.

Jude Howell . 1995. “Prospects for NGOs in China.” Development in Practice 5(1), 12.

Renee Yuen-Jan, and Lynn Hsia T. White III . 2002. “Working amid corporatism and confusion: foreign NGOs in China.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31, 329.

Yijia Jing , and E.S. Savas . 2009. “Managing collaborative service delivery: comparing China and the United States.” Public Administration Review 69 (supplement) 101–07.

He Li . 2010. “Debating China's economic reform: new Leftists vs. liberals.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 15, 123.

Qiusha Ma . 2002. “The governance of NGOs in China since 1978: how much autonomy?Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31, 305330.

Andrew Nathan . 2003. “Authoritarian resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14 (1), 617.

Yingyi Qian , and Barry Weingast . 1996. “China's transition to markets: market-preserving federalism, Chinese style.” Journal of Economic Policy Reform 1, 149185.

Tony Saich . 2007. “Citizens' perceptions of governance in rural and urban China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 12, 128.

Murray Scot Tanner . 2004. “China rethinks unrest.” The Washington Quarterly 27, 137156.

Shaoguang Wang . 2006. “Money and autonomy: patterns of civil society finance and their implications.” Studies in Comparative International Development 40 (4): 329.

Christine Wong . 2007. “Budget reform in China.” OECD Journal on Budgeting 7(1), 3356.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The China Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0305-7410
  • EISSN: 1468-2648
  • URL: /core/journals/china-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 29
Total number of PDF views: 382 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 778 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.