Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-14T06:03:55.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two Notes from the Liber Glossarvm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

M. L. W. Laistner
Affiliation:
King's College, University of London

Extract

In App. Verg. Priap. 3, 3, the most recent editor adopts the form fomitata, first proposed by I. Voss, a form which seems to derive its only authority from a passage in Paulus' abridgement of Festus (Paul. Fest. 66, 9). Though there is some variation in the MSS. of the Priapeia (formitata, formicata, formata, formidata), the first four letters are in every case the same—namely, form-. Again, in Ps.-Placidus (22, 26) the MSS. give formitat, but Goetz (Thes. Gloss, s.v.) prints this as fo[r]mitat. The reading formitata was upheld by Skutsch, who quoted the form formitare as a parallel to exitare in Catull. 17, 24, which all recent editors have changed to excitare.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1922

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Vollmer, Poet. Lat. Min2 I.

2 Glotta II. (1910), p. 156; Kl. Schr., p. 382.

3 That the correct form is - tata not -cata is shown, e.g., by Ps.-Placidus. The confusion or interchange of c and t is constant in the two chief MSS. of Lib. Gloss.

4 Thomson, H. J., St. Andy. Univ. Publ. XIII., pp. 46 sqq., and p. 154Google Scholar .

5 Cf. Brugmann–Delbrück 2, 1, p. 23, and 2, 2, p. 78.