Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-kl59c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T01:19:59.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ADDENDUM TO ‘DID CICERO “PROSCRIBE” MARCUS ANTONIUS?’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2021

John T. Ramsey*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago

Abstract

This note adduces three passages in Seneca the Elder to reinforce a demonstration in CQ 69 (2019), 793–8001 that the text of Plin. HN 7.117 has suffered corruption in one of its clauses and requires emendation to restore Pliny's intent. This additional evidence concerns a trope employed by declaimers which could have predisposed a scribe to alter Pliny's text to state that Cicero proscribed Mark Antony. Such a statement has no place in a list of achievements that otherwise all belong to Cicero's consulship twenty years earlier in 63 b.c.

Information

Type
Shorter Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Classical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable