Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    SORABJI, RICHARD 2012. TRIBUTE TO BOB SHARPLES. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 5.

    2011. Die Philosophie Marc Aurels.

    1995. The Sea Battle and the Master Argument.


Alexander of Aphrodisias, De Fato: some Parallels*

  • R. W. Sharples (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2009

As was first pointed out by Gercke, there are close parallels, which clearly suggest a common source, between Apuleius, de Platone 1.12, the treatise On Fate falsely attributed to Plutarch, Calcidius' excursus on fate in his commentary on Plato's Timaeus, and certain sections of the treatise de Natura hominis by Nemesius. Gercke traced the doctrines common to these works to the school of Gaius; recently however Dillon has pointed out that, while Albinus shares with these works the characteristic Middle-Platonic notion of fate as conditional or hypothetical – our actions are free, but once we have acted the consequences of our actions are fated and inevitable – he does not share certain other common features, such as the identification of fate as substance with the world-soul and the hierarchy of three providences.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. M. Huby , ‘An Epicurean Argument in Cicero, de fato XVII-40’, Phronesis 15 (1970), 83–5)

Sharpies, Phronesis 20 (1975), 247–58

M. E. Reesor , ‘Fate and Possibility in Early Stoic Philosophy’, Phoenix 19 (1965), 288 ff.

R. Hackforth , ‘Notes on some passages of Alexander Aphrodisiensis de fato’, CQ 40 (1946), 38).

H. R. Patch , ‘Necessity in Boethius and the Neoplatonists’, Speculum 10 (1935), 399;

L. Linsky , ‘Professor David Williams on Aristotle’, Philos. Rev. 63 (1954), 250–2;

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Classical Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0009-8388
  • EISSN: 1471-6844
  • URL: /core/journals/classical-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *