Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The influence of forensic oratory on Thucydides’ principles of method

  • Ian M. Plant (a1)

In recent years, there has been considerable debate about the reliability of Herodotus: the attack on his honesty led by Fehling, the defence by Pritchett. The debate, it seems, may have begun at least as far back as Thucydides, but now Thucydides himself may have joined the school of liars. Badian has produced a new reading of Thucydides’ description of the outbreak of the Peloponnesian War, arguing that Thucydides deliberately set out to mislead the reader, misrepresenting the Spartans as the instigators of the War and carefully masking the Athenians’ own responsibility.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. L. Moles , ‘Truth and untruth in Herodotus and Thucydides’, in C. Gill and T. P. Wiseman (edd.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Austin, 1993), pp. 88121.

J. H. Finley , Thucydides (Cambridge, MA, 1942)

J. H. Finley , ‘Euripides and Thucydides’, in Three Essays on Thucydides (Cambridge, MA, 1967), p. 9.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Classical Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0009-8388
  • EISSN: 1471-6844
  • URL: /core/journals/classical-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 46 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.