No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Miscellanea Hesiodea
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 February 2009
Extract
In Proverb. Vat. IV. 3 the proverbial Ἡσιόδειον γῆρας is somewhat darkly explained as follows: Ἀριστοτέλης ἐν Ὀρχομενίων πολιτεία δὶς τετάφθαι φησὶ τὸν Ἡσίοδον καὶ ἐπιγμματος τοῦδε τνχεῖν.
Χαῖρε, δὶς ἠβήσας καὶ δὶς τὰϕον ἀντιβολήσας,
Ἡσίοδ′, ἀνθρώποις μὲτρον ἔχων σοϕίης.
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1920
References
page 126 note 1 , Marckscheffel, Hesiodi…Fragmenta, pp. 28–29Google Scholar.
page 126 note 2 Id. pp. 53–54.
page 126 note 3 The third claimant to the poet's remains emerged after the age of Pindar, as it appears.
page 126 note 4 Pp. xvi–xvii.
page 127 note 1 Cp. VII. 20.
page 127 note 2 It may rest mainly on the fact that W. and D. is clearly not the work of a young man. Its ‘wisdom’ is the wisdom of age and experience.
page 127 note 3 This story rests on the authority of the Ὀρχομενίων Πολιτεία and of Philochorus. Clymene, however, may be quite mythical, playing the part of the ‘injured sister’ usual in murder legends: cp. Cornford, , Thucydides Mythistoricus, pp. 132 £Google Scholar, on the set type of such legends.
page 127 note 4 See Schol, . anon. ad. O. et D. 272Google Scholar.
page 128 note 1 III. 96.
page 128 note 2 Quaest. Ep., p. 2246.
page 128 note 3 De Carm. Hes. quod O. et D. inscr. Comp. et Interp., p. 13.
page 128 note 4 Hes. Gedichte, p. 56.
page 128 note 5 De Pandora Hesiodi (Satura philol. H. Sauppio oblata, p. 1401).
page 128 note 6 Prolegomena, p. 27.
page 129 note 1 Cp. Theognis, II. 145–6 βούλεο δ′ εὐσεβέων ὀλίγοις συν χρἡμασιν οἰκεῖν | ἢ πλουτεῖν ἀδίκως χρήματα πασάμενος.
page 129 note 2 Op. cit., p. 236.
page 129 note 3 W. u. T. d. Hes., p. 85.
page 129 note 4 Hesiods Gedichte, p. 47.
page 130 note 1 See , Rzach, Der Dialekt d. Hesiodos, p. 378Google Scholar.
page 130 note 2 See scholium of Proclus ad loc.
page 130 note 3 μητιόεντα is significant (as the epithets of Zeus so often are), and is supported by the best evidence (Rzach's Ѕ, Ω, Φ and Proclus): the alternative τερπικέραυνον rests on the testimony of Ψ, Tzetzes and Moschopoulos.
page 131 note 1 See Rzach, , Hesiodos (Pauly. Wissowa, Real-Encycl. VIII., cols. 1176–7Google Scholar.
page 131 note 2 Rzach, fr. 96, 11. 60–61. The imitation (or loan) is particularly valuable as being derived from the difficult ‘Second Book’ of the Suitors poem, on which see Class. Quart. IX., pp. 74 sqq.