^{page 100 note 1} Thus at K 494, Λ 737, μ 181.

^{page 101 note 1} Denniston, , Greek Particles, pp. 21–22Google Scholar, allows a progressive ⋯λλ⋯, which he finds most often in Hippocrates: but he has no examples from Homer, and says that verse examples generally are few. His earliest verse example is from Hartung, Alcman., Lehre von den Parti-keln der griechischen Sprache, ii, pp. 34–35Google Scholar says of ⋯λλ⋯ (‘im responsiven Gebrauch’) that ‘es einen Ubergang zu etwas Verschiedenem oder Entgegengesetztem ausdriickt’ (my italics). But his examples do not bring out the sense of something different which is not also in opposition. Schwyzer, , Griechische Grammatik, ii, p. 578Google Scholar, will not ad it progressive ⋯λλ⋯ at all.

^{page 103 note 1} Hdn. Gr. 2. 122. 3 Lentz

^{page 104 note 1} So in the striking case of κελαινεΦ⋯ς, which he explains as properly an epithet of Zeus: its use as an epithet of αἷμα is due to a misunderstanding of a context where it was a vocative address to Zeus, but was thought to be an attribute of αἷμα Op. cit., pp. 202–6.