Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Friesen, Bill 2011. The Opus Geminatum and Anglo-Saxon Literature. Neophilologus, Vol. 95, Issue. 1, p. 123.


    2007. A Companion to the Classical Tradition.


    Henck, Nick 2001. Constantius' paideia, intellectual milieu and promotion of the liberal arts. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, Vol. 47, p. 172.


    ×

Proba's cento: its date, purpose, and reception

  • R. P. H. Green (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800043627
  • Published online: 01 February 2009
Abstract

It may seem faintly absurd to claim or imply that a Vergilian cento has suffered unjustified neglect from scholars. These works—of which there are sixteen, covering a period of over three centuries within Late Antiquity—are usually treated at best with amused tolerance, and at worst (as in the new Anthologia Latino) with angry disdain. Though always ingenious, sometimes funny, and occasionally informative about the reception of Vergil, they are seldom admired. Even among Italian scholars, some of whom have paid much attention to centos, a recession has set in since the annus mirabilis of 1981, which saw two editions of the Medea of Hosidius Geta. Proba has, deservedly, attracted more attention than most; her aims and methods as a Christian poetess were carefully and illuminatingly studied twenty years ago by Reinhard Herzog, and her interest as a female Roman aristocrat has brought her further attention, especially in recent years. The main aim of the present article is to suggest a particular context and a serious purpose for her cento. A postscript will show that it went on to enjoy considerable popularity until the end of the century, and an introductory section will discuss its date, but very briefly, since Matthews has convincingly said most of what needs to be said about a recent attempt to redate it. Proba's preface, much of it not in cento form, calls for detailed treatment from various angles—textual, literary, historical—and will be explored in a separate article.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

H. Sivan , Vigiliae Christianae 47 (1993), 140–57

D. Shanzer , ‘The anonymous carmen contra paganos and the Date and Identity of the centonist Proba’, Revue des Etudes Augustiniennes 32 (1986), pp. 232–48

P. Nautin , Revue des Etudes Augustiniennes 19 (1973), pp. 213–30

B. C. Hardy The Emperor Julian and his school law’ in Church History 37 (1968), 131–43

A. D. Booth , Phoenix 36 (1982), 329343

R. P. H. Green in CQ 35 (1985), 502 and 505

F. H. Colson , CQ 8 (1914), 44f

A. D. Booth , Phoenix 33 (1979), 346–53

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Classical Quarterly
  • ISSN: 0009-8388
  • EISSN: 1471-6844
  • URL: /core/journals/classical-quarterly
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×