Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T20:01:15.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Old Critics of the Teaching of the Classics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

J. G. Legge
J. G. Legge
Affiliation:
Liverpool
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Contributions
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 35 , Issue 1-2 , February 1921 , pp. 7 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1921

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The works cited are the following, viz.: Sir Thomas Elyot's Boke Named the Governour (1531), in Everyman's Library; Roger Ascham's Scholemaster (1570), in Professor J. E. B. Mayor's edition, published by Bell and Daldy in 1863; Brinsley's Ludus Literatius (1613), and Hoole's New Discovery of the Old Art of Teaching Schoole, both in Professor Campagnac's scholarly edition, published by the Liverpool University Press and Messrs. Constable. Quotations from Milton are from the Amsterdam edition of 1698.

2 Messrs. George Bell and Son have kindly given permission to print this extract from Mayor's Notes in Bell and Daldy's edition.