Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-d5ftd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T08:34:56.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Vestigia Nvlla Retrorsvm - P. Ovidii Nasonis Ibis: iterum edidit et scholia adiecit F. W. Lenz. (Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum Paravianum.) Pp. liv+187. Turin: Paravia, 1956. Paper, L. 1,400. - P. Ovidii Nasonis Halieutica–Fragmenta–Nux; Incerti Consolatio ad Liviam: iterum edidit F. W. Lenz. (Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum Paravianum.) Pp. 214. Turin: Paravia, 1956. Paper. L. 1,400.

Review products

P. Ovidii Nasonis Ibis: iterum edidit et scholia adiecit F. W. Lenz. (Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum Paravianum.) Pp. liv+187. Turin: Paravia, 1956. Paper, L. 1,400.
P. Ovidii Nasonis Halieutica–Fragmenta–Nux; Incerti Consolatio ad Liviam: iterum edidit F. W. Lenz. (Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum Paravianum.) Pp. 214. Turin: Paravia, 1956. Paper. L. 1,400.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2009

E. J. Kenney
E. J. Kenney
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 1958 , pp. 133 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 I was hasty in saying (C.R., N.s. v. 14, n. 1) that this manuscript shows no affinity with PS: there are in fact remarkable agreements. It does not do to stress them in such a tradition, but it is safe to say that together with Leipzig Rep. I, fol. 7 and Linz 329 this is one of the most useful of the hitherto neglected witnesses for the text of the Amores.

2 I abstain from saying more on this head since in Mr. J. A. Richmond the authenticity of this fragment seems likely to find a redoubtable assailant. It is to be hoped that the conclusions of his powerfully argued dissertation, which I have been privileged to see, will be published before long in a suitable form.