Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T02:15:04.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Improved Contaminant Resistant Clay for Environmental Clay Liner Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2024

Laura S. Kajita
Laura S. Kajita*
Affiliation:
Colloid Environmental Technologies Company, 1350 W. Shure Drive, Arlington Heights, Illinois 60004
*
†Present address: PO Box 1337, St. Charles, Illinois 60174.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Testing shows that many of the present commercially available bentonite products used for clay liner/soil sealant applications may be susceptible to chemical degradation by certain contaminants. Testing also confirms that a recently developed contaminant resistant clay (CRC) is resistant to various contaminants that would otherwise attack and degrade the present commercially available products. The tests that were used to determine its effectiveness were American Petroleum Institute (API) fluid loss, rigid wall hydraulic conductivity, flexible wall hydraulic conductivity and a newly developed top loading filter press (TLFP) test (LSK method).

Keywords

API Fluid LossBentoniteChemical DegradationContaminant ResistanceExchangeable CationsFlexible Wall PermeabilityFlocculationGeosynthetic Clay LinerHydraulic ConductivityPrehydrationRigid Wall Permeability

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 45 , Issue 5 , October 1997 , pp. 609 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © 1997, The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Colloid Company., 1990 Free swell determination procedure ACC 1010 .Google Scholar
American Petroleum Institute., 1993 Method for measurement of fluid loss 16–17.Google Scholar
American Society for TestingMaterials., 1990 ASTM D698 .Google Scholar
American Society for TestingMaterials., 1990 ASTM D5084-90 .Google Scholar
American Society for TestingMaterials., 1974 ASTM D2434-68 .Google Scholar
Dobras, T.N. and Elzea, J.M., 1993 In-situ soda ash treatment for contaminated geosynthetic clay liners Geosynthetics 93 1145–1159.Google Scholar
Egloffstein, T. 1994. Properties and test methods to assess bentonite used in geosynthetic clay liners. In: Koerner, R.M., Gattung, E., Zanzinger, H., editors. Geosynthetic clay liners. Rotterdam, Netherlands: AA Balkema. p 51–72.Google Scholar
Geosynthetic Research Institute., 1993 GRI test method GCL-2 1–3.Google Scholar
Rogers, W.F., 1963 Composition and properties of oil well drilling fluids Houston, TX Gulf Publ Co..Google Scholar
Ruhl, J.L., 1994 Effects of leachates on the hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) Austin, TX Univ TX at Austin.Google Scholar
Trauger, R., 1996 GCL case study technical data sheet: CET-CO’s contaminant resistant clay (CRC) Arlington Heights, IL Colloid Environ Technol Co..Google Scholar