Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-lpd2x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T08:48:50.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of Trace Amounts of Erionite Using X-Ray Powder Diffraction: Erionite in Tuffs of Yucca Mountain, Nevada, and Central Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

David L. Bish  and
Steve J. Chipera
David L. Bish
Affiliation:
Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Steve J. Chipera
Affiliation:
Earth and Environmental Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent data in the biological literature suggest that the natural zeolite erionite may be more tumorigenic than asbestos minerals. Because of its potential biological importance, a technique has been developed to facilitate detection of erionite in tuffaceous rocks to a lower limit of detection (LLD) between 100 and 500 ppm. The method involves the use of automated X-ray powder diffraction instrumentation with long count times, as much as 360 s/step. The presence of interfering phases, such as smectite or clinoptilolite, raises the LLD. Ethylene glycol solvation of smectite improves the LLD, and profile fitting with clinoptilolite-bearing mixtures improves quantification. Application of these methods to tuffs from central Turkey allowed improved detection and more accurate quantification compared with previous scanning electron microscope examinations. Use of these methods with tuffs from Yucca Mountain, Nevada, the potential site for the nation's first high-level radioactive waste repository, showed that erionite occurs sporadically. Erionite is found only in the altered zone directly above the lower vitrophyre of the Topopah Spring Member. This altered zone is anomalous in that is contains a variety of zeolites that are either rare or absent in other Yucca Mountain tuffs. It appears that erionite is restricted to fractures and must have formed under unusual and variable conditions in the altered zone.

Keywords

ClinoptiloliteDetection limitsErioniteProfile refinementX-ray powder diffractionZeolitic tuffs
Type
Research Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , August 1991 , pp. 437 - 445
Copyright
Copyright © 1991, The Clay Minerals Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bariş, Y. I., Özemsi, M., Kerse, I., Özen, E., Sahin, A., Kolaçan, B. and Ogankulu, M., 1975 An outbreak of pleural mesothelioma in the village of Karain/Ürgüp—Anatolia Kanser 5 1 – 14.Google Scholar
Baris, I., Simonato, L., Artvinli, M., Pooley, F., Saracci, R., Skidmore, J. and Wagner, C., 1987 Epidemiological and environmental evidence of the health effects of exposure to erionite fibres: A four-year study in the Cappadocian region of Turkey Int. J. Cancer 39 10 – 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bish, D. L., 1984 Effects of exchangeable cation composition on the thermal expansion/contraction of clinoptilolite Clays & Clay Minerals 32 444 – 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bish, D. L. and Chipera, S. J. (1989a) Revised mineralogic summary of Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Los Alamos Nat. Lab. Kept. LA–11497–MS, 68 pp.Google Scholar
Bish, D. L. and Chipera, S. J., 1989 Comparison of a solid-state Si detector to a conventional scintillation detector-monochromator system in X-ray powder diffractometry Powder Diffraction 4 137 – 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broxton, D. E., Bish, D. L. and Warren, R. G., 1987 Distribution and chemistry of diagenetic minerals at Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada Clays & Clay Minerals 35 89 – 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlos, B. A. (1985) Minerals in fractures of the unsaturated zone from drill core USW G-4, Yucca Mountain, Nye County, Nevada: Los Alamos Nat. Lab. Rept. LA–10415–MS, 55 pp.Google Scholar
Carter, J. R., Hatcher, M. T. and Di Carlo, L., 1987 Quantitative analysis of quartz and cristobalite in bentonite clay based products by X-ray diffraction Anal. Chem. 59 513 – 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chipera, S. J. and Bish, D. L. (1989) The occurrence and distribution of erionite at Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Los Alamos Nat. Lab. Rept. LA–11663–MS, 20 pp.Google Scholar
Chung, F. H., 1974 Quantitative interpretation of X-ray diffraction patterns of mixtures. II. Adiabatic principle of X-ray diffraction analysis of mixtures J. Appl. Crystallogr. 7 526 – 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffin, D. L., Peters, S. E., Palekar, L. D., Stahel, E. P. and Wehner, A. P., 1989 A study of the biological activity of erionite in relation to its chemical and structural characteristics Proceedings of Biological Interaction of Inhaled Mineral Fibers and Cigarette Smoke Columbus, Ohio Battelle Press 313 – 323.Google Scholar
Coffin, D. L., Palekar, L. D., Cook, P. M., Creason, J. P. and Wehner, A. P., 1989 Comparison of mesothelioma induction in rats by asbestos and nonasbestos mineral fibers: Possible correlation with human exposure data Proceedings of Biological Interaction of Inhaled Mineral Fibers and Cigarette Smoke Columbus, Ohio Battelle Press 347 – 354.Google Scholar
Davis, B. L., 1988 The estimation of limits of detection in RIM quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis Adv. X-ray Analysis 31 317 – 323.Google Scholar
Deffeyes, K. S., 1959 Erionite from Cenozoic tuffaceous sediments, central Nevada Amer. Mineral. 44 501 – 509.Google Scholar
Klug, H. P. and Alexander, L. E., 1974 X-ray Diffraction Procedures for Polycrystalline and Amorphous Materials New York Wiley 524 – 525.Google Scholar
Mumpton, F. A. (1979) A reconnaissance study of the association of zeolites with mesothelioma occurrences in central Turkey: U.S. Geol. Sure. Open-File Rept. 79–954, 55 pp.Google Scholar
Palekar, L. D., Eyre, J. F., Coffin, D. L. and Wehner, A. P., 1989 Chromosomal changes associated with tumorigenic mineral fibers Proceedings of Biological Interaction of Inhaled Mineral Fibers and Cigarette Smoke Columbus, Ohio Battelle Press 355 – 372.Google Scholar
Papke, K. G. (1972) Erionite and other associated zeolites in Nevada: Nevada Bur. Mines & Geol. Bull. 79, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Puledda, S. and Marconi, A., 1989 Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of four types of amphibolic asbestos by the silver membrane filter method Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 36 209 – 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohl, A. N., Langer, A. M., Moncure, G., Selikoff, I. J. and Fischbein, A., 1982 Endemic pleural disease associated with exposure to mixed fibrous dust in Turkey Science 216 518 – 520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sèbastien, P., Bignon, J., Barris, Y. I., Awad, L. and Petit, G., 1984 Ferruginous bodies in sputum as an indication of exposure to airborne mineral fibers in the mesothelioma villages of Cappadocia Arch. Environ. Health 39 18 – 23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheppard, R. A. and Gude, A. J. 3rd (1980) Diagenetic fluorite in the Eastgate zeolite deposit, Churchill County, Nevada: U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-File Rept. 80–506, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Simonato, L., Baris, R., Saracci, R., Skidmore, J., Winkelmann, R., Bignon, J., Peto, J. and Saracci, R., 1989 Relation of environmental exposure to erionite fibres to risk of respiratory cancer Non-occupational Exposure to Mineral Fibres Lyon, France Intern. Agency for Research on Cancer 398 – 405.Google Scholar
Smith, D. K., Nichols, M. C. and Zolensky, M. E., 1982 POWD10. A FORTRAN IV program for calculating X-ray powder diffraction patterns—version 10 Pennsylvania The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Y., Kohyama, N., Kallo, D. and Sherry, H. S., 1988 Carcinogenic and fi-brogenic effects of erionite, mordenite, and synthetic zeolite 4 A Occurrence, Properties, and Utilization of Natural Zeolites Budapest Akademiai Kiado 829 – 840.Google Scholar
Wagner, J. C., Skidmore, J. W., Hill, R. J. and Griffiths, D. M., 1985 Erionite exposure and mesotheliomas in rats Br. J. Cancer 51 727 – 730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed