Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-03T20:42:54.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Microscopy as a Method of Identifying Clays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Thomas F. Bates*
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, State College, Pennsylvania, USA

Abstract

Electron microscope studies show that most of the clay minerals have morphological characteristics which can be effectively used to aid in their identification. In addition, detailed studies at high magnification have provided structural information not obtainable by other means.

In the kaolinite group each of the common minerals has a clear-cut and diagnostic morphology. However, much more work is needed on flint clays and the kaolins in soils before the same can be said of these varieties. Continued study of halloysite reveals significant details pertinent to the form and structure of the tubular crystals.

Illites from different sources show interesting differences in form which reflect variation in the degree of crystallinity. An illite from the Ordovician Oswego formation shows an unusual development of narrow to broad lath-shaped crystals. Except for lower content of iron and magnesium the material has all the characteristics of other illites. The thinnest laths are of the same order of thickness as the flakes of more common illites. Certain mixed-layer minerals are identical in morphology with some varieties of illite.

The minerals of the moutmorillonite group have been the most difficult of the clay minerals to characterize on the basis of morphology. The lath-shaped crystals of certain beidellites, sauconite, nontronite, and hectorite are diagnostic. The metal shadowing technique shows that many of the laths approach one unit cell in thickness.

The morphology of many montmorillonites is dependent upon the mode of sample preparation. The replica method offers a means of studying clay particles in their natural state but this technique is still in the early stages of development as it relates to the clay minerals.

Type
Part III—Methods of Identifying Clays and the Interpretation of Results
Copyright
© Clay Minerals Society 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected References

Bates, T F, Investigation of the micaceous minerals in slate Am. Mineralogist 1947 32 625636.Google Scholar
Bates, T F, Morphology of layer lattice silicates Deni-son Univ. Bull. 1951 42 8391.Google Scholar
Bates, T F Hildebrand, F A Swineford, A, Morphology and structure of endellite and halloysite Am. Mineralogist 1950 35 463484.Google Scholar
Grim, R E Bray, R H Bradley, W F, The mica in argillaceous sediments Am. Mineralogist 1937 22 813829.Google Scholar
Mathieu-Sieaud, A Mering, J Perrin-Bonnet, I, Étude au microscope electronique de la montmorillonite et de l’hec-torite saturees par differents cations Soc. franc, mineralogie Bull. 1951 74 439456.Google Scholar
Weaver, C E, A lath shaped non-expanded dioctahedral 2:1 clay mineral Am. Mineralogist 1953 38 279289.Google Scholar