Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-sh9ch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-09-03T00:16:04.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Objective predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services—a systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

Ottilie Sedgwick*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK Broadmoor Hospital, West London Mental Health Trust, Berkshire, UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry and South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
Susan Young
Affiliation:
Broadmoor Hospital, West London Mental Health Trust, Berkshire, UK Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
Mrigendra Das
Affiliation:
Broadmoor Hospital, West London Mental Health Trust, Berkshire, UK
Veena Kumari
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry and South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, London, UK
*
*Address for correspondence: Ottilie Sedgwick, Department of Psychology (PO78), Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK. (Email: ottilie.sedgwick@kcl.ac.uk)

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to examine whether neurobiological methods, or other methods independent of clinical judgment, have been investigated to assist decision making in forensic mental health services and, if so, whether this may be a useful strategy for predicting outcomes. OVID-Medline, Embase, and PsychInfo (inception–January 2015) were searched, limiting to English and human studies, using terms relating to “predict,” “outcome,” “psychiatry,” and “forensic” to identify primary research articles reporting on predictors of outcome in forensic mental health services not reliant on clinical judgment/self-report. Fifty studies investigating demographic, neuropsychological/neurophysiological, and biological predictors were identified, reporting on 3 broad outcomes: (i) inpatient violence, (ii) length of stay, (iii) reoffending. Factors associated positively, negatively, and showing no relationship with each outcome were extracted and compiled across studies. Of various demographic predictors examined, the most consistent associations were between previous psychiatric admissions and inpatient violence; a more “severe” offense and a longer length of stay; and young age and reoffending. Poor performance on tests of cognitive control and social cognition predicted inpatient violence while a neurophysiological measure of impulsivity showed utility predicting reoffending. Serum cholesterol and creatine kinase emerged as biological factors with potential to predict future inpatient violence. Research in this field is in its infancy, but investigations conducted to date indicate that using objective markers is a promising strategy to predict clinically significant outcomes.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Sedgwick supplementary material S1

Supplementary Table

Download Sedgwick supplementary material S1(File)
File 237.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Sedgwick supplementary material S2

Supplementary Table

Download Sedgwick supplementary material S2(File)
File 54.8 KB