Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Neural correlates of attentional bias in addiction

  • Robert Hester (a1) and Maartje Luijten (a2)
Abstract

A small but growing neuroimaging literature has begun to examine the neural mechanisms underlying the difficulty that substance-use dependent (SUD) groups have with ignoring salient, drug-related stimuli. Drug-related attentional bias appears to implicate the countermanding forces of cognitive control and reward salience. Basic cognitive neuroscience research suggests that ignoring emotionally evocative stimuli in our environment requires both up-regulation of control networks and down-regulation of processing in emotion and reward regions. Research to date suggests that attentional biases for drug-related stimuli emerge from a failure to sufficiently increase control of attention over salient, but task-irrelevant stimuli. While SUD samples have typically shown increased activity in the cognitive control regions (ie, lateral prefrontal and dorsal anterior cingulate), during attentional bias such increases appear to have been insufficient for the concomitant increases in processing by the emotion/reward regions (ie, amygdala, insula, and striatum). Given the potential contribution of attentional biases to perpetuating drug use and the development of interventions (both pharmaceutical and cognitive-behavioral) to treat biases, understanding the neural basis of successfully reducing bias remains an important, but as yet unanswered, question for our field.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: Robert Hester, PhD, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia. (Email hesterr@unimelb.edu.au)
Footnotes
Hide All

This research was supported by an Australian Research Council Fellowship (FT110100088) (R.H.)

Footnotes
References
Hide All
1.Field, M, Cox, WM. Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: a review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 97(1–2): 120.
2.Field, M, Munafo, MR, Franken, IH. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychol Bull. 2009; 135(4): 589607.
3.Franken, IH. Drug craving and addiction: integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003; 27(4): 563579.
4.Cox, WM, Hogan, LM, Kristian, MR, Race, JH. Alcohol attentional bias as a predictor of alcohol abusers’ treatment outcome. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2002; 68(3): 237243.
5.Corbetta, M, Shulman, GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002; 3(3): 201215.
6.Pessoa, L, Kastner, S, Ungerleider, LG. Neuroimaging studies of attention: from modulation of sensory processing to top-down control. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(10): 39903998.
7.Bradley, B, Field, M, Mogg, K, De Houwer, J. Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting. Behav Pharmacol. 2004; 15(1): 2936.
8.Munafo, M, Mogg, K, Roberts, S, Bradley, BP, Murphy, M. Selective processing of smoking-related cues in current smokers, ex-smokers and never-smokers on the modified Stroop task. J Psychopharmacol. 2003; 17(3): 310316.
9.Robinson, TE, Berridge, KC. Addiction. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003; 54: 2553.
10.Garavan, H, Pankeiwicz, J, Bloom, A, etal. Cue-induced cocaine craving: neuroanatomical specificity for drug users and drug stimuli. Am J Psychiatry. 2000; 157(11): 17891798.
11.Childress, AR, Mozley, PD, McElgin, W, etal. Limbic activation during cue-induced cocaine craving. Am J Psychiatry. 1999; 156(1): 1118.
12.Franken, IH, Hendriks, VM, Stam, CJ, Van den Brink, W. A role for dopamine in the processing of drug cues in heroin dependent patients. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004; 14(6): 503508.
13.Grant, S, London, ED, Newlin, DB, etal. Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996; 93(21): 1204012045.
14.Koob, GF, Volkow, ND. Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(1): 217238.
15.Berridge, KC, Robinson, TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998; 28(3): 309369.
16.Pessoa, L, Ungerleider, LG. Neuroimaging studies of attention and the processing of emotion-laden stimuli. Prog Brain Res. 2004; 144: 171182.
17.Miller, E, Cohen, JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001; 24: 167202.
18.Goldstein, RZ, Volkow, ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011; 12(11): 652669.
19.Kerns, JG. Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex activity in an FMRI study of trial-to-trial adjustments on the Simon task. Neuroimage. 2006; 33(1): 399405.
20.Egner, T, Hirsch, J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat Neurosci. 2005; 8(12): 17841790.
21.Etkin, A, Egner, T, Kalisch, R. Emotional processing in anterior cingulate and medial prefrontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011; 15(2): 8593.
22.Goldstein, RZ, Alia-Klein, N, Tomasi, D, etal. Anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivations to an emotionally salient task in cocaine addiction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(23): 94539458.
23.Goldstein, RZ, Alia-Klein, N, Tomasi, D, etal. Is decreased prefrontal cortical sensitivity to monetary reward associated with impaired motivation and self-control in cocaine addiction? Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164(1): 4351.
24.Goldstein, RZ, Woicik, PA, Maloney, T, etal. Oral methylphenidate normalizes cingulate activity in cocaine addiction during a salient cognitive task. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(38): 1666716672.
25.Goldstein, RZ, Tomasi, D, Alike-Klein, N, etal. Dopaminergic response to drug words in cocaine addiction. J Neurosci. 2009; 29(18): 60016006.
26.Nestor, L, McCabe, E, Jones, J, Clancy, L, Garavan, H. Differences in “bottom-up” and “top-down” neural activity in current and former cigarette smokers: evidence for neural substrates which may promote nicotine abstinence through increased cognitive control. Neuroimage. 2011; 56(4): 22582275.
27.Marhe, R, Luijten, M, van de Wetering, BJ, Smits, M, Franken, IH. Individual differences in anterior cingulate activation associated with attentional bias predict cocaine use after treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 38(6): 10851093.
28.Hester, R, Garavan, H. Neural mechanisms underlying drug-related cue distraction in active cocaine users. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009; 93(3): 270277.
29.Ersche, KD, Bullmore, ET, Craig, KJ, etal. Influence of compulsivity of drug abuse on dopaminergic modulation of attentional bias in stimulant dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(6): 632644.
30.Vollstädt-Klein, S, Loeber, S, Richter, A, etal. Validating incentive salience with functional magnetic resonance imaging: association between mesolimbic cue reactivity and attentional bias in alcohol-dependent patients. Addict Biol. 2012; 17(4): 807816.
31.Luijten, M, Veltman, DJ, van den Brink, W, etal. Neurobiological substrate of smoking-related attentional bias. Neuroimage. 2011; 54(3): 23742381.
32.Janes, AC, Pizzagalli, DA, Richardt, S, etal. Brain reactivity to smoking cues prior to smoking cessation predicts ability to maintain tobacco abstinence. Biol Psychiatry. 2010; 67(8): 722729.
33.Janes, AC, Pizzagalli, DA, Richardt, S, etal. Neural substrates of attentional bias for smoking-related cues: an FMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(12): 23392345.
34.Luijten, M, Veltman, DJ, Hester, R, etal. Brain activation associated with attentional bias in smokers is modulated by a dopamine antagonist. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012; 37(13): 27722779.
35.Janes, AC, Jensen, JE, Farmer, SL, etal. GABA levels in the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex associated with difficulty ignoring smoking-related cues in tobacco-dependent volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013; 38(6): 11131120.
36.Janes, AC, Pizzagalli, DA, Richardt, S, etal. Neural substrates of attentional bias for smoking-related cues: an FMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010; 35(12): 23392345.
37.Ersche, KD, Bullmore, ET, Craig, KJ, etal. Influence of compulsivity of drug abuse on dopaminergic modulation of attentional bias in stimulant dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010; 67(6): 632644.
38.Kober, H, Mende-Siedlecki, P, Kross, EF, etal. Prefrontal-striatal pathway underlies cognitive regulation of craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(33): 1481114816.
39.Egner, T, Etkin, A, Gale, S, Hirsch, J. Dissociable neural systems resolve conflict from emotional versus nonemotional distracters. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 18(6): 14751484.
40.Stippekohl, B, Walter, B, Winkler, MH, etal. An early attentional bias to BEGIN-stimuli of the smoking ritual is accompanied with mesocorticolimbic deactivations in smokers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012; 222(4): 593607.
41.Schoenmakers, TM, Bruin, MD, Lux, IF, etal. Clinical effectiveness of attentional bias modification training in abstinent alcoholic patients. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010; 109(1–3): 3036.
42.Hester, R, Dixon, V, Garavan, H. A consistent attentional bias for drug-related material in active cocaine users across word and picture versions of the emotional Stroop task. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 81(3): 251257.
43.Bauer, D, Cox, WM. Alcohol-related words are distracting to both alcohol abusers and non-abusers in the Stroop colour-naming task. Addiction. 1998; 93(10): 15391542.
44.Goldstein, RZ, Tomasi, D, Rajaram, S, etal. Role of the anterior cingulate and medial orbitofrontal cortex in processing drug cues in cocaine addiction. Neuroscience. 2007; 144(4): 11531159.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

CNS Spectrums
  • ISSN: 1092-8529
  • EISSN: 2165-6509
  • URL: /core/journals/cns-spectrums
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 14
Total number of PDF views: 111 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 416 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.