Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Play it Again: The Master Psychopharmacology Program as an Example of Interval Learning in Bite-Sized Portions


Medical education often presents new material as large data dumps at a single live event (lecture or symposium), in part because it is traditional, and also because this structure can be perceived as the most time efficient for busy clinicians and their teachers. However, modern learning theory and new insights from the neurobiological basis of long-term memory formation show that the format of single-event presentation of materials is not very effective. Rather, seeing the presentation of new materials over time, in bite-sized chunks, and then seeing them again at a later time, particularly as a test, leads to more retention of information than does learning the same amount of material as a large bolus in a single setting. This notion of learning over time, also called “interval learning” or “spaced learning,” is particularly well adapted to the Internet era. Here we describe an application of this concept to the learning of psychopharmacology over time in bite-sized and repeated portions structured as an “online fellowship” called the Master Psychopharmacology Program (

Corresponding author
If you would like to comment on this column or submit a suggestion to Dr. Stahl for future columns, please e-mail
Hide All
1.Stahl SM, Davis RL. Best Practices for Medical Educators. Carlsbad, CA: NEI Press; 2009.
2.Stahl SM, Davis RL. Applying the principles of adult learning to the teaching of psychopharmacology: overview and finding the focus. CNS Spectr. 2009; 14: 179182.
3.Stahl SM, Davis RL. Applying the principles of adult learning to the teaching of psychopharmacology: storyboarding a presentation and the rule of small multiples. CNS Spectr. 2009; 14: 288294.
4.Stahl SM, Davis RL. Applying the principles of adult learning to the teaching of psychopharmacology: audience response systems. CNS Spectr. 2009; 14: 412414.
5.Ebbinghaus H. Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc, 1964; original German text published 1885.
6.McKenna SP, Glendon AI. Occupational first aid training: decay in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills. J Occup Psychol. 1985; 58: 109117.
7.Bell DS, Harless CE, Higa JK, et al. Knowledge retention after an online tutorial: a randomized educational experiment among resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23: 11641171.
8.Davis D, O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Wolf FM, Mazmanian P, Taylor-Vaisey A. Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes? JAMA. 1999; 282: 867874.
9.Davis D. Does CME work? An analysis of the effect of educational activities on physician performance or health care outcomes. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1998; 28: 2139.
10.Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RM. Changing physicians performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995; 274: 700705.
11.Doucet M, Vrins A, Harvey D. Effect of using an audience response system on learning environment, motivatin and long term retention, during case discussion in a large group of undergraduate veterinary clinical pharmacology students. Medical Teacher. 2009; 31: e570–e579.
12.Tufte E. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Cheshire, CT; Graphics Press; 1983.
13.Tufte E. Visual Explanations. Cheshire, CT; Graphics Press; 1997.
14.Tufte E. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press; 1990.
15.Curran VR, Fleet L. A review of evaluation outcomes of web-based continuing medical education. Medical Education. 2005; 39: 561567.
16.Sisti HM, Glass AL, Shors RJ. Neurogenesis and the spacing effect: learning over time enhances memory and the survival of new neurons. Learn Mem. 2007; 14: 368375.
17.Lee JLC. Reconsolidation: maintaining memory relevance. TINS. 2009; 32: 413420.
18.O'Neill J, Pleydell-Bouverie B, Dupret D, Csicscari J. Play it again: reactivation of waking experience and memory. TINS. 2010; 33: 220229.
19.Squire LR, Bloom FE, McConnell SK, Roberts JL, Spitzer NC, Zigmond MJ. Fundamental Neuroscience. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2003.
20.Fields RD. Making memories stick. Scientific American. 2005; 292: 7481.
21.Glenberg AM and Lehmann TS. Spacing repetitions over 1 week. Mem Cognit. 1980; 8: 528538.
22.Toppino TC, Kasserman JE, Mracek WA. The effect of spacing repetitions on the recognition memory of young children and adults. J Exp Child Psychol. 1991; 51: 123138.
23.Landauer TK, Bjork RA. Optimum rehearsal patterns and name learning. In: Gruneberg MM, Morris PE, Sykes RN, eds. Practical Aspects of Memory. New York, NY; Academic Press; 1978: 625632.
24.Karpicke JD, Roediger HL. The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science. 2008; 319: 9668.
25.Storm BC, Bjork RA, Storm JC. Optimizing retrieval as a learning event: when and why expanding retrieval practice enhances long term retention. Mem Cognt. 2010; 38: 244253.
26.Pashler H, Horher D, Cepeda NJ, Carpenter SK. Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2007; 14: 187193.
27.Bjork RA. Retrieval practice and the maintenance of knowledge. In: Gruneberg MM, Morris PE, Sykes RN, eds. Practical Aspects of Memory: Current Research and Issues. Vol 1. New York, NY; Wiley; 1988: 396401.
28.Son LK. Metacognitive control and the spacing effect. J Exp Psychol. 2010; 36: 255262.
29.Stahl SM. Methylated spirits: epigenetic hypotheses of psychiatric disorders. CNS Spectr. 2010; 15: 7989.
30.Sweatt JD. Experience-dependent epigenetic modifications in the central nervous system. Biol Psychiatry. 2009; 65: 191197.
31.Cameron HA, McKay RDG. Adult neurogenesis produces a large pool of new granule cells in the dentate gyrus. J Comp Neurol. 2001; 435: 406417.
32.Strickgold R, et al. Sleep, learning and dreams: off line memory processing. Science. 2001; 294: 10521057.
33.Marshall L, Born J. The contribution of sleep to hippocampus dependent memory consolidation. Trend Cogn Sci. 2007; 11: 442450.
34.Maquet P. The role of sleep in learning and memory. Science. 2001; 10481052.
35.Roegiger JL, Karpicke JD. Test enhanced learning, taking memory tests improves long term retention. Psychol Sci. 2005; 17: 249255.
36.Johnson BC, Kiviniemi MT. The effect of online chapter quizzes on exam performance in an undergraduate social psychology course. Teach Psychol. 2009; 36: 3337.
37.Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG, Thomas MR, Pankratz VS. Impact of self assessment questions and learning styles in web-based learning: a randomized, controlled crossover trial. Acad Med. 2006; 81: 231238.
38.Kerfoot BP. Interactive spaced education versus web based modules for teaching urology to medical students: a randomized controlled trial. J Urol. 2008; 79: 23512357.
39.Kerfoot BP. Learning benefits of online spaced education persist for 2 years. J Urol. 2009; 181: 26712673.
40.Kerfoot BP, Bortschi E. Online spaced education to teach urology to medical students: a multi institutional randomized trial. Am J Surg. 2009; 197: 8995.
41.Small GW, Moody TD, Siddarth P, Bookheimer SY. Your brain on google: patterns of cerebral activation during internet searching. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009; 17: 116126.
42.Wear D. A perfect storm: the convergence of bullet points, competencies, and screen reading in medical education. Acad Medicine. 2009; 84: 15001504.
43.Stahl SM. Stahls Essential Psychopharmacology. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
44.Stahl SM. Stahls Essential Psychopharmacology Prescribers Guide. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
45.Schatzberg AF, Nemeroff CB, eds. Textbook of Psychopharmacology. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2004.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

CNS Spectrums
  • ISSN: 1092-8529
  • EISSN: 2165-6509
  • URL: /core/journals/cns-spectrums
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 28 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 462 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.