Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:36:57.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predictors of functional response and remission with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in patients with major depressive disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

Claudio N. Soares ,
Jean Endicott ,
Matthieu Boucher ,
Rana S. Fayyad  and
Christine J. Guico-Pabia
Claudio N. Soares*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Jean Endicott
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
Matthieu Boucher
Affiliation:
Medical Affairs, Pfizer CanadaInc, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada
Rana S. Fayyad
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, PfizerInc, New York, New York, USA
Christine J. Guico-Pabia
Affiliation:
Medical Affairs, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Claudio N. Soares, MD, PhD, FRCPC, Women's Health Concerns Clinic, 301 James St. South FB638, Hamilton, ON, Canada. (Email claunsoares@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

The predictive value of early functional improvement for treatment success at week 8 was assessed in a pooled analysis in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD).

Methods

Data were pooled from 7 double-blind studies in adult patients with MDD randomly assigned to desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d or placebo. Four levels of treatment success were determined at week 8 for patients with baseline Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) score > 12 (N = 2156): functional response (SDS ≤12 and ≥50% improvement in SDS), functional/depression response (SDS ≤12 and ≥50% improvement in both SDS and 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D17] score), functional remission (SDS < 7), and functional/depression remission (SDS < 7 and HAM-D17 ≤7). Week 2 improvement in SDS was evaluated as a predictor of later functional response/remission using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) of the predictability of improvement thresholds were computed from a logistic regression model.

Results

The proportion of patients achieving each level of treatment success was significantly greater for patients treated with desvenlafaxine (40%, 32%, 23%, 15%, respectively) vs placebo (31%, 22%, 17%, 10%; all P ≤ 0.002). Early change in SDS was a highly significant predictor of functional response/remission (ORs, 0.958–0.970; all P < 0.0001).

Discussion

Patients’ early functional response to desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d is predictive of treatment success.

Keywords

Antidepressantsmajor depressive disorderpredictive value of teststreatment outcome
Type
Original Research
Information
CNS Spectrums , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 519 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This study was sponsored by Pfizer. Medical writing support was provided by Kathleen Dorries, PhD, of Peloton Advantage and was funded by Pfizer.

Clinical Trial Registry Numbers: 332: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00277823; 333: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00300378; 335: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00384033; 3359: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00798707; 3362: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00863798; 3364: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01121484; 4415: www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00824291.

References

1.Hamilton, M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960; 23(1): 56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Montgomery, SA, Asberg, M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979; 134: 382–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Koran, LM, Hamilton, SH, Hertzman, M, etal. Predicting response to fluoxetine in geriatric patients with major depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995; 15(6): 421–427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Szegedi, A, Muller, MJ, Anghelescu, I, etal. Early improvement under mirtazapine and paroxetine predicts later stable response and remission with high sensitivity in patients with major depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003; 64(4): 413–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Szegedi, A, Jansen, WT, van Willigenburg, AP, etal. Early improvement in the first 2 weeks as a predictor of treatment outcome in patients with major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis including 6562 patients. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009; 70(3): 344–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Kok, RM, van Baarsen, C, Nolen, WA, Heeren, TJ. Early response as predictor of final remission in elderly depressed patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009; 24(11): 1299–1303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Lin, CH, Lane, HY, Chen, CC, Juo, SH, Yen, CF. Early prediction of fluoxetine response for Han Chinese inpatients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011; 31(2): 187–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2001: Mental health: new understanding, new hope. http://www.who.int/whr/2001/en/whr01_en.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2013.Google Scholar
9.Hirschfeld, RM, Dunner, DL, Keitner, G, etal. Does psychosocial functioning improve independent of depressive symptoms? A comparison of nefazodone, psychotherapy, and their combination. Biol Psychiatry. 2002; 51(2): 123–133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Hirschfeld, RM, Montgomery, SA, Keller, MB, etal. Social functioning in depression: a review. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000; 61(4): 268–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Bech, P. Social functioning: should it become an endpoint in trials of antidepressants? CNS Drugs. 2005; 19(4): 313–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Papakostas, GI. Major depressive disorder: psychosocial impairment and key considerations in functional improvement. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15(11 Suppl): S316–S321.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Trivedi, MH, Corey-Lisle, PK, Guo, Z, etal. Remission, response without remission, and nonresponse in major depressive disorder: impact on functioning. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009; 24(3): 133–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Fifer, SK, Buesching, DP, Henke, CJ, etal. Functional status and somatization as predictors of medical offset in anxious and depressed patients. Value Health. 2003; 6(1): 40–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Hunkeler, EM, Spector, WD, Fireman, B, Rice, DP, Weisner, C. Psychiatric symptoms, impaired function, and medical care costs in an HMO setting. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003; 25(3): 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Jain, G, Roy, A, Harikrishnan, V, etal. Patient-reported depression severity measured by the PHQ-9 and impact on work productivity: results from a survey of full-time employees in the United States. J Occup Environ Med. 2013; 55(3): 252–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Stewart, WF, Ricci, JA, Chee, E, Hahn, SR, Morganstein, D. Cost of lost productive work time among US workers with depression. JAMA. 2003; 289(23): 3135–3144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Simon, GE, Revicki, D, Heiligenstein, J, etal. Recovery from depression, work productivity, and health care costs among primary care patients. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000; 22(3): 153–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19.Guico-Pabia, CJ, Fayyad, RS, Soares, CN. Assessing the relationship between functional impairment/recovery and depression severity: a pooled analysis. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012; 27(1): 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Mauskopf, JA, Simon, GE, Kalsekar, A, etal. Nonresponse, partial response, and failure to achieve remission: humanistic and cost burden in major depressive disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2009; 26(1): 83–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Sheehan, DV. Sheehan Disability Scale. In Rush AJ, Pincus HA, First MB, eds. Handbook of Psychiatric Measures. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000: 113–115.Google Scholar
22.Endicott, J, Dorries, KM. Functional outcomes in MDD: established and emerging assessment tools. Am J Manag Care. 2009; 15(11 Suppl): S328–S334.Google ScholarPubMed
23.Soares, CN, Fayyad, RS, Guico-Pabia, CJ. Early improvement in depressive symptoms with desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d as a predictor of treatment success in patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014; 34(1): 57–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. World Medical Association. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/17c.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2013.Google Scholar
25.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed.Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 1994.Google Scholar
26.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th ed, text rev. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.Google Scholar
27.Clayton, A, Kornstein, SG, Dunlop, BW, etal. Efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013; 74(10): 1010–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Dunlop, BW, Reddy, S, Yang, L, etal. Symptomatic and functional improvement in employed depressed patients: a double-blind clinical trial of desvenlafaxine versus placebo. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2011; 31(5): 569–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Lipman, RS. Differentiating anxiety and depression in anxiety disorders: use of rating scales. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1982; 18(4): 69–77.Google ScholarPubMed
30. World Health Organization. Wellbeing measures in primary health care/the depcare project. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/130750/E60246.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2013.Google Scholar
31.Cleary, P, Guy, W. Factor analysis of the Hamilton depression scale. Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1977; 1(1-2): 115–120.Google Scholar
32.Sheehan, KH, Sheehan, DV. Assessing treatment effects in clinical trials with the discan metric of the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008; 23(2): 70–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33.Lam, RW, Kennedy, SH, Grigoriadis, S, etal. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. III. Pharmacotherapy. J Affect Disord. 2009; 117(Suppl 1): S26–S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Work Group on Major Depressive Disorder. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder. American Psychiatric Association. http://www.psychiatryonline.com/pracGuide/pracGuideTopic_7.aspx. Accessed October 7, 2013.Google Scholar
35.Farabaugh, A, Sonawalla, S, Johnson, DP, etal. Early improvements in anxiety, depression, and anger/hostility symptoms and response to antidepressant treatment. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2010; 22(3): 166–171.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Henkel, V, Seemuller, F, Obermeier, M, etal. Does early improvement triggered by antidepressants predict response/remission? Analysis of data from a naturalistic study on a large sample of inpatients with major depression. J Affect Disord. 2009; 115(3): 439–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.McIntyre, RS. When should you move beyond first-line therapy for depression? J Clin Psychiatry. 2010; 71(Suppl 1): 16–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
38.Gallop, RJ. Determination and interpretation of the OOP for ROC's with PROC LOGISTIC. In Proceedings of the NorthEast SAS Users Group. Baltimore, MD: NorthEast SAS Users Group; 2001: 777–782.Google Scholar
39.Adler, DA, McLaughlin, TJ, Rogers, WH, etal. Job performance deficits due to depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2006; 163(9): 1569–1576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40.Trivedi, MH, Morris, DW, Wisniewski, SR, etal. Increase in work productivity of depressed individuals with improvement in depressive symptom severity. Am J Psychiatry. 2013; 170(6): 633–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Liebowitz, MR, Manley, AL, Padmanabhan, SK, etal. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day and 100 mg/day in outpatients with major depressive disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008; 24(7): 1877–1890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42.Boyer, P, Montgomery, S, Lepola, U, etal. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fixed-dose desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/day for major depressive disorder in a placebo-controlled trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008; 23(5): 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Tourian, KA, Padmanabhan, SK, Groark, J, Brisard, C, Farrington, D. Desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in the treatment of major depressive disorder: an 8-week, phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial and a post hoc pooled analysis of three studies. Clin Ther. 2009; 31(Pt 1): 1405–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Iwata, N, Tourian, KA, Hwang, E, Mele, L, Vialet, C, for the Study 3359 Investigators. Efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 25 and 50 mg/day in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of depressed outpatients. J Psychiatr Pract. 2013; 19(1): 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Liebowitz, MR, Tourian, KA, Hwang, E, Mele, L, for the Study 3362 Investigators. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study assessing the efficacy and tolerability of desvenlafaxine 10 and 50 mg/d in adult outpatients with major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2013; 13(1): 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar