Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-r5d9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T19:00:46.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-World Antipsychotic and Vesicular Monoamine Transporter Type 2 Inhibitor Treatment Patterns in Patients Newly Diagnosed with Tardive Dyskinesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2025

Marko Mychaskiw
Affiliation:
1Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Global Health Economics and Outcomes Research, West Chester, PA, United States
Julian Casciano
Affiliation:
2eMAX Health, Delray Beach, FL, United States
Zenobia Dotiwala
Affiliation:
2eMAX Health, Delray Beach, FL, United States
Nayla Chaijale
Affiliation:
3Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., Global Medical Affairs, West Chester, PA, United States
Stacy Finkbeiner
Affiliation:
4Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc., North America Medical Affairs, Parsippany, NJ, United States
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is associated with antipsychotic (AP) use and management includes antipsychotic (AP) dose modification/discontinuation, often leaving underlying psychiatric conditions undertreated. Deutetrabenazine (DTBZ) is a vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 inhibitor (VMAT2i) approved to treat TD and Huntington disease– associated chorea. AP and VMAT2i treatment patterns post-TD diagnosis are unclear.

Methods

Patients aged ≥18 years, newly diagnosed with TD (July 2019– June 2022), with ≥1 AP and no VMAT2i claims pre-index were identified from the Symphony Health Solutions Integrated Dataverse (medical, hospital, and prescription claims across all US payer types). Patients were grouped into DTBZ (≥1 DTBZ claim within ≤6 months post-diagnosis) and non-VMAT2i groups, and further by stable DTBZ dose (for ≥60 days). The index date was the first DTBZ claim (DTBZ group) or the difference between TD diagnosis and first DTBZ claim (of the matched patient) added to TD diagnosis (non-VMAT2i group).

Results

Among 18,375 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 587 (3%) received DTBZ (292 stable-dose DTBZ), 676 (4%) received a different VMAT2i, and 17,112 (93%) had no VMAT2i claims. Among propensity score-matched patients with ≥1 AP claim pre- and post-index (326 DTBZ, 627 non-VMAT2i), pre-index mean AP proportions of days covered (PDCs) were similar between DTBZ (86%), stable-dose DTBZ (86%), and non-VMAT2i (83%) groups. Mean PDCs decreased post-index for DTBZ (86% to 85%) and non-VMAT2i (83% to 81%) groups, but increased for the stable-dose DTBZ group (86% to 88%). While these changes were small, post-index mean PDCs were significantly greater (versus non-VMAT2i) in the DTBZ (5% difference; P=.030) and stable-dose DTBZ (9%; P=.001) groups. Similar proportions of patients in the DTBZ (20%) and non-VMAT2i (20%) groups discontinued APs (ie, no AP claims within ≤6 months post-index). Proportions of patients with AP restarts (7%– 8%) and dose decreases (13%– 17%) were also similar between DTBZ, stable-dose DTBZ, and non-VMAT2i groups. Proportions of patients (16%– 18%) with AP dose increases were similar between DTBZ and non-VMAT2i groups, but significantly greater in the stable-dose DTBZ group (21%) vs non-VAMT2i (P=.02).

Conclusions

AP adherence was significantly, though not substantially, greater for DTBZ versus non-VMAT2i groups. These results suggest that DTBZ, when titrated to a stable/optimal dose, allows flexibility in treating underlying psychiatric conditions.

Funding

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Information

Type
Abstracts
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press