Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T00:19:51.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Loose Hamilton Cycles in Regular Hypergraphs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2014

ANDRZEJ DUDEK ,
ALAN FRIEZE ,
ANDRZEJ RUCIŃSKI  and
MATAS ŠILEIKIS
ANDRZEJ DUDEK
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA (e-mail: andrzej.dudek@wmich.edu)
ALAN FRIEZE
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA (e-mail: alan@random.math.cmu.edu)
ANDRZEJ RUCIŃSKI
Affiliation:
Department of Discrete Mathematics, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznań, Poland (e-mail: rucinski@amu.edu.pl)
MATAS ŠILEIKIS
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Box 480, 751 06 Uppsala, Sweden (e-mail: matas.sileikis@math.uu.se)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We establish a relation between two uniform models of random k-graphs (for constant k ⩾ 3) on n labelled vertices: ℍ(k) (n,m), the random k-graph with exactly m edges, and ℍ(k) (n,d), the random d-regular k-graph. By extending the switching technique of McKay and Wormald to k-graphs, we show that, for some range of d = d(n) and a constant c > 0, if m ~ cnd, then one can couple ℍ(k) (n,m) and ℍ(k) (n,d) so that the latter contains the former with probability tending to one as n → ∞. In view of known results on the existence of a loose Hamilton cycle in ℍ(k) (n,m), we conclude that ℍ(k) (n,d) contains a loose Hamilton cycle when d ≫ log n (or just d ⩾ C log n, if k = 3) and d = o(n 1/2).

Keywords

Primary 05C6505C80Secondary 05C38

Information

Type
Paper
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 24 , Special Issue 1: Honouring the Memory of Philippe Flajolet - Part 3 , January 2015 , pp. 179 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1] Barbour, A. D., Holst, L. and Janson, S. (1992) Poisson Approximation, Vol. 2 of Oxford Studies in Probability, Oxford Science Publications, The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
[2] Bender, E. A. and Canfield, E. R. (1978) The asymptotic number of labeled graphs with given degree sequences. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A 24 296–307.Google Scholar
[3] Bollobás, B. (1980) A probabilistic proof of an asymptotic formula for the number of labelled regular graphs. Europ. J. Combin. 1 311–316.Google Scholar
[4] Bollobás, B. (2001) Random Graphs, second edition, Vol. 73 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
[5] Bollobás, B. and Frieze, A. M. (1985) On matchings and Hamiltonian cycles in random graphs. In Random Graphs '83: Poznań 1983, Vol. 118 of North-Holland Mathematics Studies, North-Holland, pp. 23–46.Google Scholar
[6] Chvátal, V. (1991) Almost all graphs with 1.44n edges are 3-colorable. Random Struct. Alg. 2 11–28.Google Scholar
[7] Cooper, C., Frieze, A. and Reed, B. (2002) Random regular graphs of non-constant degree: Connectivity and Hamiltonicity. Combin. Probab. Comput. 11 249–261.Google Scholar
[8] Dudek, A. and Frieze, A. (2011) Loose Hamilton cycles in random uniform hypergraphs. Electron. J. Combin. 18 #48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Dudek, A. and Frieze, A. (2013) Tight Hamilton cycles in random uniform hypergraphs. Random Struct. Alg. 42 374–385.Google Scholar
[10] Dudek, A., Frieze, A., Loh, P.-S. and Speiss, S. (2012) Optimal divisibility conditions for loose Hamilton cycles in random hypergraphs. Electron. J. Combin. 19 #44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Dudek, A., Frieze, A., Ruciński, A. and Šileikis, M. (2013) Approximate counting of regular hypergraphs. Inform. Process. Lett. 113 785–788.Google Scholar
[12] Frieze, A. (2010) Loose Hamilton cycles in random 3-uniform hypergraphs. Electron. J. Combin. 17 note 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Janson, S., Łuczak, T. and Rucinski, A. (2000) Random Graphs, Wiley-Interscience Series in Discrete Mathematics and Optimization, Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
[14] Kim, J. H. and Vu, V. H. (2004) Sandwiching random graphs: Universality between random graph models. Adv. Math. 188 444–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Knuth, D. E. (1976) Big omicron and big omega and big theta. SIGACT News 8 18–24.Google Scholar
[16] Krivelevich, M., Sudakov, B., Vu, V. H. and Wormald, N. C. (2001) Random regular graphs of high degree. Random Struct. Alg. 18 346–363.Google Scholar
[17] McDiarmid, C. (1998) Concentration. In Probabilistic Methods for Algorithmic Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 16 of Algorithms and Combinatorics, Springer, pp. 195–248.Google Scholar
[18] McKay, B. D. and Wormald, N. C. (1990) Uniform generation of random regular graphs of moderate degree. J. Algorithms 11 52–67.Google Scholar
[19] Robinson, R. W. and Wormald, N. C. (1992) Almost all cubic graphs are Hamiltonian. Random Struct. Alg. 3 117–125.Google Scholar
[20] Robinson, R. W. and Wormald, N. C. (1994) Almost all regular graphs are Hamiltonian. Random Struct. Alg. 5 363–374.Google Scholar
[21] Wormald, N. C. (1999) Models of random regular graphs. In Surveys in Combinatorics: Canterbury 1999, Vol. 267 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–298.Google Scholar