Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-30T03:01:22.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linear-Time Approximation Algorithms for the Max Cut Problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2008

Nguyen van Ngoc  and
Zsolt Tuza
Nguyen van Ngoc
Affiliation:
Fl C20 Kim Giang, Dong Da – Ha Noi, Viet Nam
Zsolt Tuza
Affiliation:
Computer and Automation Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, H-llll Budapest, Kende u. 13-17, Hungary
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Let G be a connected graph with n vertices and m edges (multiple edges allowed), and let k ≥ 2 be an integer. There is an algorithm with (optimal) running time of O(m) that finds

(i) a bipartite subgraph of G with ≥ m/2 + (n − 1)/4 edges,

(ii) a bipartite subgraph of G with ≥ m/2 + 3(n−1)/8 edges if G is triangle-free,

(iii) a k-colourable subgraph of G with ≥ m − m/k + (n−1)/k + (k − 3)/2 edges if k ≥ 3 and G is not k-colorable.

Infinite families of graphs show that each of those lower bounds on the worst-case performance are best possible (for every algorithm). Moreover, even if short cycles are excluded, the general lower bound of m − m/k cannot be replaced by m − m/k + εm for any fixed ε > 0; and it is NP-complete to decide whether a graph with m edges contains a k-colorable subgraph with more than m − m/k + εm edges, for any k ≥ 2 and ε> 0, ε < 1/k.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Combinatorics, Probability and Computing , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , June 1993 , pp. 201 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Andersen, L. D., Grant, D. D. and Linial, N. (1983) Extremal k-colourable subgraphs. Ars Combinatoria 16 259–270.Google Scholar
[2]Caro, Y. and Tuza, Zs. (1991) Improved lower bounds on k-independence. J. Graph Theory 15 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Edwards, C. S. (1973) Some extremal properties of bipartite subgraphs. Canadian J. Math. 25 475–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Erdős, P. (1959) Graph theory and probability. Canadian J. Math. 11 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Erdős, P. (1964) On even subgraphs of graphs. Mat. Lapok 8 283–288 (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
[6]Erdős, P., Faudree, R., Pach, J. and Spencer, J. (1988) How to make a graph bipartite. J. Combinatorial Theory Ser. B 45 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Erdős, P. and Lovász, L. (1979) See §8, pp. 159–161. In: Erdős P., Problems and results in graph theory and combinatorial analysis. In: Bondy, J. A. and Murty, U. S. R. (eds), Graph Theory and Related Topics, Proc. conf. Waterloo (Canada) 1977, Academic Press, 153–163.Google Scholar
[8]Garey, M. R. and Johnson, D. S. (1979) Computers and Intractability – A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, Freeman.Google Scholar
[9]Van Ngoc, Nguyen (1987) On Graph Colorings, Thesis, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest (in Hungarian).Google Scholar
[10]Poljak, S. and Turzik, D. (1982) A Polynomial algorithm for constructing a large bipartite subgraph, with an application to a satisfiability problem. Canadian J. Math. 34 519–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Poljak, S. and Turzik, D. (1986) A polynomial time heuristic for certain subgraph optimization problems with guaranteed worst case bound. Discrete Math. 58 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Poljak, S. and Tuza, Zs. (to appear) Bipartite subgraphs of triangle-free graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math.Google Scholar
[13]Shearer, J. B. (1992) A note on bipartite subgraphs of triangle-free graphs. Random Structures & Algorithms 3 223–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Tuza, Zs. (1992) Graph coloring in linear time. J. Combinatorial Theory Ser B 55 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Tuza, Zs. (to appear) Theorem proving through depth-first search. Acta Univ. Carolinae–Math. Phys. 33.Google Scholar