No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 August 2025
Let $\Sigma$ be an alphabet and
$\mu$ be a distribution on
$\Sigma ^k$ for some
$k \geqslant 2$. Let
$\alpha \gt 0$ be the minimum probability of a tuple in the support of
$\mu$ (denoted
$\mathsf{supp}(\mu )$). We treat the parameters
$\Sigma , k, \mu , \alpha$ as fixed and constant. We say that the distribution
$\mu$ has a linear embedding if there exist an Abelian group
$G$ (with the identity element
$0_G$) and mappings
$\sigma _i : \Sigma \rightarrow G$,
$1 \leqslant i \leqslant k$, such that at least one of the mappings is non-constant and for every
$(a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_k)\in \mathsf{supp}(\mu )$,
$\sum _{i=1}^k \sigma _i(a_i) = 0_G$. In [Bhangale-Khot-Minzer, STOC 2022], the authors asked the following analytical question. Let
$f_i: \Sigma ^n\rightarrow [\!-1,1]$ be bounded functions, such that at least one of the functions
$f_i$ essentially has degree at least
$d$, meaning that the Fourier mass of
$f_i$ on terms of degree less than
$d$ is at most
$\delta$. If
$\mu$ has no linear embedding (over any Abelian group), then is it necessarily the case that
\begin{equation*}\left | \mathop {\mathbb{E}}_{({\textbf {x}}_1, {\textbf {x}}_2, \ldots , {\textbf {x}}_k)\sim \mu ^{\otimes n}}[f_1({\textbf {x}}_1)f_2({\textbf {x}}_2)\cdots f_k({\textbf {x}}_k)] \right | = o_{d, \delta }(1),\end{equation*}
$\to 0$ as the degree
$d \to \infty$ and
$\delta \to 0$?
In this paper, we answer this analytical question fully and in the affirmative for $k=3$. We also show the following two applications of the result.
1. The first application is related to hardness of approximation. Using the reduction from [5], we show that for every $3$-ary predicate
$P:\Sigma ^3 \to \{0,1\}$ such that
$P$ has no linear embedding, an SDP (semi-definite programming) integrality gap instance of a
$P$-Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) instance with gap
$(1,s)$ can be translated into a dictatorship test with completeness
$1$ and soundness
$s+o(1)$, under certain additional conditions on the instance.
2. The second application is related to additive combinatorics. We show that if the distribution $\mu$ on
$\Sigma ^3$ has no linear embedding, marginals of
$\mu$ are uniform on
$\Sigma$, and
$(a,a,a)\in \texttt{supp}(\mu )$ for every
$a\in \Sigma$, then every large enough subset of
$\Sigma ^n$ contains a triple
$({\textbf {x}}_1, {\textbf {x}}_2,{\textbf {x}}_3)$ from
$\mu ^{\otimes n}$ (and in fact a significant density of such triples).