Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T13:32:02.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On approximability of satisfiable $\boldsymbol {k}$-CSPs: II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2025

Amey Bhangale
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA
Subhash Khot
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA
Dor Minzer*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Dor Minzer; Email: minzer.dor@gmail.com

Abstract

Let $\Sigma$ be an alphabet and $\mu$ be a distribution on $\Sigma ^k$ for some $k \geqslant 2$. Let $\alpha \gt 0$ be the minimum probability of a tuple in the support of $\mu$ (denoted $\mathsf{supp}(\mu )$). We treat the parameters $\Sigma , k, \mu , \alpha$ as fixed and constant. We say that the distribution $\mu$ has a linear embedding if there exist an Abelian group $G$ (with the identity element $0_G$) and mappings $\sigma _i : \Sigma \rightarrow G$, $1 \leqslant i \leqslant k$, such that at least one of the mappings is non-constant and for every $(a_1, a_2, \ldots , a_k)\in \mathsf{supp}(\mu )$, $\sum _{i=1}^k \sigma _i(a_i) = 0_G$. In [Bhangale-Khot-Minzer, STOC 2022], the authors asked the following analytical question. Let $f_i: \Sigma ^n\rightarrow [\!-1,1]$ be bounded functions, such that at least one of the functions $f_i$ essentially has degree at least $d$, meaning that the Fourier mass of $f_i$ on terms of degree less than $d$ is at most $\delta$. If $\mu$ has no linear embedding (over any Abelian group), then is it necessarily the case that

\begin{equation*}\left | \mathop {\mathbb{E}}_{({\textbf {x}}_1, {\textbf {x}}_2, \ldots , {\textbf {x}}_k)\sim \mu ^{\otimes n}}[f_1({\textbf {x}}_1)f_2({\textbf {x}}_2)\cdots f_k({\textbf {x}}_k)] \right | = o_{d, \delta }(1),\end{equation*}
where the right hand side $\to 0$ as the degree $d \to \infty$ and $\delta \to 0$?

In this paper, we answer this analytical question fully and in the affirmative for $k=3$. We also show the following two applications of the result.

  1. 1. The first application is related to hardness of approximation. Using the reduction from [5], we show that for every $3$-ary predicate $P:\Sigma ^3 \to \{0,1\}$ such that $P$ has no linear embedding, an SDP (semi-definite programming) integrality gap instance of a $P$-Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) instance with gap $(1,s)$ can be translated into a dictatorship test with completeness $1$ and soundness $s+o(1)$, under certain additional conditions on the instance.

  2. 2. The second application is related to additive combinatorics. We show that if the distribution $\mu$ on $\Sigma ^3$ has no linear embedding, marginals of $\mu$ are uniform on $\Sigma$, and $(a,a,a)\in \texttt{supp}(\mu )$ for every $a\in \Sigma$, then every large enough subset of $\Sigma ^n$ contains a triple $({\textbf {x}}_1, {\textbf {x}}_2,{\textbf {x}}_3)$ from $\mu ^{\otimes n}$ (and in fact a significant density of such triples).

MSC classification

Information

Type
Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bateman, M. and Katz, N. (2012) New bounds on cap sets. J Am Math Soc 25(2) 585613.10.1090/S0894-0347-2011-00725-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergelson, V. and Tao, T. (2014) Multiple recurrence in quasirandom groups. Geom Funct Anal 24(1) 148.10.1007/s00039-014-0252-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhangale, A., Harsha, P. and Roy, S. (2022) Mixing of 3-Term Progressions in Quasirandom Groups. In 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS), vol. 215, pp. 20:1- 20:9.Google Scholar
Bhangale, A. and Khot, S. (2021) Optimal inapproximability of satisfiable k-lin over non-abelian groups. In Proceedings of the 53rd annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 16151628. ACM.10.1145/3406325.3451003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhangale, A., Khot, S. and Minzer, D. (2022) On approximability of satisfiable k-csps: I. In Proceedings of the 54th annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 976988. ACM.10.1145/3519935.3520028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, M., Khot, S., Lifshitz, N. and Minzer, D. (2021) An invariance principle for the multi-slice, with applications. In Proceedings of the 62nd annual symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 228236. IEEE.10.1109/FOCS52979.2021.00030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, M., Khot, S. and Minzer, D. (2021) On Rich 2-to-1 Games. In 12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS), vol. 185, pp. 27:1- 27:20.Google Scholar
Brown, T. C. and Buhler, J. P. (1982) A density version of a geometric ramsey theorem. J Combinatorial Theory, Se A 32(1) 2034.10.1016/0097-3165(82)90062-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, G., Filmus, Y., Minzer, D., Mossel, E. and Saurabh, N. (2022) Approximate polymorphisms. In Proceedings of the 54th annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 195202. ACM.10.1145/3519935.3519966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croot, E., Lev, V. F. and Pach, P. P. (2017) Progression-free sets in are exponentially small. Ann Math 185(1) 331337.10.4007/annals.2017.185.1.7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellenberg, J. S. and Gijswijt, D. (2017) On large subsets of with no three-term arithmetic progression. Ann Math 185(1) 339343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, W. T. (2008) Quasirandom groups. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 17(3) 363387.10.1017/S0963548307008826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazła, J., Holenstein, T. and Mossel, E. (2018) Product space models of correlation: Between noise stability and additive combinatorics. Discrete Analysis (2018). https://discreteanalysisjournal.com/article/6513-product-space-models-of-correlation-between-noise-stability-and-additive-combinatorics Google Scholar
Jones, C. (2016) A noisy-influence regularity lemma for boolean functions. CoRR Google Scholar
Khot, S. (2002) On the power of unique 2-prover 1-round games. In Proceedings of the 34th annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 767775. ACM.10.1145/509907.510017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meshulam, R. (1995) On subsets of finite abelian groups with no 3-term arithmetic progressions. J Combinatorial Theory, Ser A 71(1) 168172.10.1016/0097-3165(95)90024-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossel, E. (2010) Gaussian bounds for noise correlation of functions. Geom Funct Anal 19(6) 17131756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mossel, E., O’Donnell, R. and Oleszkiewicz, K. (2005) Noise stability of functions with low influences: invariance and optimality. In Proceedings of the 46th annual symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 2130. IEEE.10.1109/SFCS.2005.53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, R. (2014) Analysis of boolean functions. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139814782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peluse, S. (2018) Mixing for three-term progressions in finite simple groups. Math Proc Cambridge 165(2) 279286.10.1017/S0305004117000482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghavendra, P. (2008) Optimal algorithms and inapproximability results for every csp? In Proceedings of the 14th annual Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), pp. 245254.Google Scholar
Raghavendra, P. (2009) Approximating NP-hard problems efficient algorithms and their limits. University of Washington.Google Scholar
Roth, K. F. (1953) On certain sets of integers. J London Math Soc s1-28(1) 104109.10.1112/jlms/s1-28.1.104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szemerédi, E. (1975) On sets of integers containing k elements in arithmetic progression. Acta Arith 27(1) 199245.10.4064/aa-27-1-199-245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, T. (2013) Mixing for progressions in nonabelian groups, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, vol. 1, pp. e2. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar