Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Multiplicative Noise Removal Based on Unbiased Box-Cox Transformation

  • Yu-Mei Huang (a1), Hui-Yin Yan (a1) and Tieyong Zeng (a2) (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Multiplicative noise removal is a challenging problem in image restoration. In this paper, by applying Box-Cox transformation, we convert the multiplicative noise removal problem into the additive noise removal problem and the block matching three dimensional (BM3D) method is applied to get the final recovered image. Indeed, BM3D is an effective method to remove additive Gaussian white noise in images. A maximum likelihood method is designed to determine the parameter in the Box-Cox transformation. We also present the unbiased inverse transform for the Box-Cox transformation which is important. Both theoretical analysis and experimental results illustrate clearly that the proposed method can remove multiplicative noise very well especially when multiplicative noise is heavy. The proposed method is superior to the existing methods for multiplicative noise removal in the literature.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email addresses: zeng@hkbu.edu.hk (T. Zeng), huangym@lzu.edu.cn (Y.-M. Huang), yanhy12@lzu.edu.cn (H.-Y. Yan)
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

[2] T. Amemiya and J. Powell , A comparison of the Box-Coxmaximumlikelihood estimator and the non-linear two-stage least squares estimator, Journal of Econometrics, 17 (1981), 315321.

[4] G. Aubert and J. Aujol , A variational approach to remove multiplicative noise, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68 (2008), 925946.

[5] L. Bar , N. Schen and N. Kiryati , Image deblurring in the presence of impulsive noise, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 70 (2006), 279298.

[6] J. Bioucas-Dias and M. Figueiredo , Multiplicative noise removal using variable splitting and constrained optimization, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 19 (2010), 17201730.

[8] C. Brune , A. Sawatzky and M. Burger , Primal and dual Bregman methods with application to optical nanoscopy, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 92 (2011), 211229.

[9] A. Buades , B. Coll and J. Morel , A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one, J. Multi. Model. Simul., 4 (2005), 490530.

[12] J. Cai , R. Chan and M. Nikolova , Fast two-phase image deblurring under impulse noise, J. Math. Imaging Vis., 36 (2010), 4653.

[14] P.-S. Chan , Log-Gamma Distribution, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 2004.

[15] T. Chan and J. Shen , Image Processing And Analysis: Variational, PDE, Wavelet, And Stochastic Methods, SIAM Publisher, 2005.

[16] R. Chan , S. Riemenschneider , L. Shen and Z. Shen , Tight Frame: An efficient way for high-resolution image reconstruction, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 17 (2004), 91115.

[17] K. Chen and R. Chan , Multilevel algorithm for a Poisson noise removal model with total-variation regularization, Int. J. Comput. Math., 84 (2007), 11831198.

[18] C. Chesneau , M. Fadili and J. Starck , Stein block thresholding for image denoising, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 28 (2010), 6788.

[19] K. Dabov , A. Foi V. Katkovnik and K. Egiazarian , Image denoising by sparse 3-D Transform-Domain collaborative Filtering, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 16 (2007), 20802095.

[20] C. Deledalle , L. Denis and F. Tupin , Iterative weighted maximum likelihood denoising with probabilistic patch-based weights, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 18 (2009), 26612672.

[22] Y. Dong and T. Zeng , New hybrid variational recovery model for blurred images with multiplicative noise, East Asian journal on applied mathematics, 3 (2013), 263282.

[23] D. Donoho and I. Johnstone , Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika, 81 (1994), 425455.

[24] S. Durand , J. Fadili and M. Nikolova , Multiplicative noise removal using L 1 fidelity on frame coefficients, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 36 (2010), 201226.

[25] M. Elad and M. Aharon , Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 15 (2006), 37363745.

[27] Y. Huang , M. Ng and Y. Wen , A new total variation method for multiplicative noise removal, SIAM J. Imag. Sci., 2 (2009), 2040.

[28] Y. Huang , M. Ng and Y. Wen , Fast image restoration methods for impulse and Gaussian noises removal, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 16 (2009), 457460.

[29] Y. Huang , L. Moisan , M. Ng and T. Zeng , Multiplicative noise removal via a learned dictionary, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 21 (2012), 45344543.

[30] T. Le , R. Chartrand and T. J. Asaki , A variational approach to reconstructing images corrupted by Poisson noise, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 27 (2007), 257263.

[31] S. Lintner and F. Malgouyres , Solving a variational image restoration model which involves L constraints, Inverse Problems., 20 (2004), 815831.

[32] X. H. Liu , M. Tanaka and M. Okutomi , Single-Image Noise Level Estimation for Blind Denoising, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 22 (2013), 52265237.

[33] M. Lysaker , A. Lundervold and X. Tai , Noise removal using fourth-order partial differential equation with applications to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 12 (2003), 15791590.

[35] L. Ma , J. Yu , and T. Zeng , Sparse representation prior and total variation-based image deblurring under impulse noise, SIAM J. Imag. Sci., 6 (2013), 22582284.

[37] M. Mäkitalo and A. Foi , Optimal inversion of the Anscombe transformation in low-count Poisson image denoising, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 20 (2010), 99109.

[38] M. Mäkitalo and A. Foi , Noise parameter mismatch in variance stabilization, with an application to Poisson-Gaussian noise estimation, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 23 (2014), 53485359.

[41] L. Rudin , S. Osher and E. Fatemi , Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Phys. D, 60 (1992), 259268.

[42] J. Shi and S. Osher , A nonlinear inverse scale method for a convex multiplicative noise model, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 1 (2008), 294321.

[43] G. Steidl and T. Teuber , Removing multiplicative noise by Douglas-Rachford splitting methods, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 36 (2010), 168184.

[45] T. Teuber and A. Lang , A new similarity measure for nonlocal filtering in the presence of multiplicative noise, Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 56 (2012), 38213842.

[46] C. Wu and X. Tai , Augmented Lagrangian method, dual methods, and split Bregman iteration for ROF, vectorial TV, and high order models, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 3 (2010), 300339.

[47] Y. Xiao , T. Zeng , J. Yu and M. Ng , Restoration of images corrupted by mixed Gaussian-impulse noise via l 1-l 0 minimization, Pattern Recognition, 44 (2011), 17081728.

[48] B. Zhang , J. Fadili and J. Starck , Wavelets, ridgelets and curvelets for Poisson noise removal, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 17 (2008), 10931108.

[49] X. Zhao , F. Wang and M. Ng , A new convex optimization model formultiplicative noise and blur removal, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7 (2014), 456475.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Communications in Computational Physics
  • ISSN: 1815-2406
  • EISSN: 1991-7120
  • URL: /core/journals/communications-in-computational-physics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 36 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th July 2017 - 25th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.