Skip to main content
×
Home

Multiplicative Noise Removal Based on Unbiased Box-Cox Transformation

  • Yu-Mei Huang (a1), Hui-Yin Yan (a1) and Tieyong Zeng (a2) (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Multiplicative noise removal is a challenging problem in image restoration. In this paper, by applying Box-Cox transformation, we convert the multiplicative noise removal problem into the additive noise removal problem and the block matching three dimensional (BM3D) method is applied to get the final recovered image. Indeed, BM3D is an effective method to remove additive Gaussian white noise in images. A maximum likelihood method is designed to determine the parameter in the Box-Cox transformation. We also present the unbiased inverse transform for the Box-Cox transformation which is important. Both theoretical analysis and experimental results illustrate clearly that the proposed method can remove multiplicative noise very well especially when multiplicative noise is heavy. The proposed method is superior to the existing methods for multiplicative noise removal in the literature.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email addresses: zeng@hkbu.edu.hk (T. Zeng), huangym@lzu.edu.cn (Y.-M. Huang), yanhy12@lzu.edu.cn (H.-Y. Yan)
References
Hide All
[1] Abbasi B., Akhavan Niaki S.T. and Seyedan S.E., A simple transformation method in skewness reduction, IJE Transactions A: Basics, 24 (2011), 169175.
[2] Amemiya T. and Powell J., A comparison of the Box-Coxmaximumlikelihood estimator and the non-linear two-stage least squares estimator, Journal of Econometrics, 17 (1981), 315321.
[3] Atkinson A., Regression diagnostics, transformation and constructed variables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 44 (1982), 136.
[4] Aubert G. and Aujol J., A variational approach to remove multiplicative noise, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68 (2008), 925946.
[5] Bar L., Schen N. and Kiryati N., Image deblurring in the presence of impulsive noise, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 70 (2006), 279298.
[6] Bioucas-Dias J. and Figueiredo M., Multiplicative noise removal using variable splitting and constrained optimization, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 19 (2010), 17201730.
[7] Box G. and Cox D., An analysis of transformations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 26 (1964), 211234.
[8] Brune C., Sawatzky A. and Burger M., Primal and dual Bregman methods with application to optical nanoscopy, Int. J. Comput. Vis., 92 (2011), 211229.
[9] Buades A., Coll B. and Morel J., A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one, J. Multi. Model. Simul., 4 (2005), 490530.
[10] Buades A., Coll B. and Morel J., A non-local algorithm for image denoising, In: IEEE Conf. on CVPR, 2 (2005), 6065.
[11] Cai J., Chan R. and Nikolova M., Two-phase approach for deblurring images corrupted by impulse plus Gaussian noise, Inverse Probl. Imaging, 2 (2008), 187204.
[12] Cai J., Chan R. and Nikolova M., Fast two-phase image deblurring under impulse noise, J. Math. Imaging Vis., 36 (2010), 4653.
[13] Chambolle A., An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications, J. Math. Imag. Vision, 20 (2004), 8997.
[14] Chan P.-S., Log-Gamma Distribution, Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, 2004.
[15] Chan T. and Shen J., Image Processing And Analysis: Variational, PDE, Wavelet, And Stochastic Methods, SIAM Publisher, 2005.
[16] Chan R., Riemenschneider S., Shen L. and Shen Z., Tight Frame: An efficient way for high-resolution image reconstruction, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 17 (2004), 91115.
[17] Chen K. and Chan R., Multilevel algorithm for a Poisson noise removal model with total-variation regularization, Int. J. Comput. Math., 84 (2007), 11831198.
[18] Chesneau C., Fadili M. and Starck J., Stein block thresholding for image denoising, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 28 (2010), 6788.
[19] Dabov K., Foi A. Katkovnik V. and Egiazarian K., Image denoising by sparse 3-D Transform-Domain collaborative Filtering, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 16 (2007), 20802095.
[20] Deledalle C., Denis L. and Tupin F., Iterative weighted maximum likelihood denoising with probabilistic patch-based weights, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 18 (2009), 26612672.
[21] Dong Y. and Zeng T., A convex variational model for restoring blurred images with multiplicative noise, SIAM J. Imag. Sci., 6 (2013), 15981625.
[22] Dong Y. and Zeng T., New hybrid variational recovery model for blurred images with multiplicative noise, East Asian journal on applied mathematics, 3 (2013), 263282.
[23] Donoho D. and Johnstone I., Ideal spatial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage, Biometrika, 81 (1994), 425455.
[24] Durand S., Fadili J. and Nikolova M., Multiplicative noise removal using L 1 fidelity on frame coefficients, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 36 (2010), 201226.
[25] Elad M. and Aharon M., Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 15 (2006), 37363745.
[26] Gu S., Zhang L., Zuo W., and Feng X., Weighted Nuclear Norm Minimization with Application to Image Denoising, CVPR., 2014.
[27] Huang Y., Ng M. and Wen Y., A new total variation method for multiplicative noise removal, SIAM J. Imag. Sci., 2 (2009), 2040.
[28] Huang Y., Ng M. and Wen Y., Fast image restoration methods for impulse and Gaussian noises removal, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 16 (2009), 457460.
[29] Huang Y., Moisan L., Ng M. and Zeng T., Multiplicative noise removal via a learned dictionary, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 21 (2012), 45344543.
[30] Le T., Chartrand R. and Asaki T. J., A variational approach to reconstructing images corrupted by Poisson noise, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 27 (2007), 257263.
[31] Lintner S. and Malgouyres F., Solving a variational image restoration model which involves L constraints, Inverse Problems., 20 (2004), 815831.
[32] Liu X. H., Tanaka M. and Okutomi M., Single-Image Noise Level Estimation for Blind Denoising, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 22 (2013), 52265237.
[33] Lysaker M., Lundervold A. and Tai X., Noise removal using fourth-order partial differential equation with applications to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 12 (2003), 15791590.
[34] Ma L., Yu J. and Zeng T., A dictionary learning approach for Poisson image deblurring, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, 32 (2013) 12771289.
[35] Ma L., Yu J., and Zeng T., Sparse representation prior and total variation-based image deblurring under impulse noise, SIAM J. Imag. Sci., 6 (2013), 22582284.
[36] Mittal A., Soundararajan R. and Bovik A. C., Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer, IEEE Signal Process. Lett., 21 (2013), 209212.
[37] Mäkitalo M. and Foi A., Optimal inversion of the Anscombe transformation in low-count Poisson image denoising, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 20 (2010), 99109.
[38] Mäkitalo M. and Foi A., Noise parameter mismatch in variance stabilization, with an application to Poisson-Gaussian noise estimation, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 23 (2014), 53485359.
[39] Osborne J., Improving your data transformations: applying the Box-Cox transformation, Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation., 2010.
[40] Rudin L., Lions P. and Osher S., Multiplicative denoising and deblurring: theory and algorithms, Geometric Level Sets in Imaging, Vision, and Graphics, Springer, 2003.
[41] Rudin L., Osher S. and Fatemi E., Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms, Phys. D, 60 (1992), 259268.
[42] Shi J. and Osher S., A nonlinear inverse scale method for a convex multiplicative noise model, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 1 (2008), 294321.
[43] Steidl G. and Teuber T., Removing multiplicative noise by Douglas-Rachford splitting methods, J. Math. Imaging Vision, 36 (2010), 168184.
[44] Teuber T. and Lang A., Nonlocal filters for removing multiplicative noise, Scale Space and Variational Methods. New York: Springer-Verlag, 6667 (2012), 5061.
[45] Teuber T. and Lang A., A new similarity measure for nonlocal filtering in the presence of multiplicative noise, Comput. Statist. Data Anal., 56 (2012), 38213842.
[46] Wu C. and Tai X., Augmented Lagrangian method, dual methods, and split Bregman iteration for ROF, vectorial TV, and high order models, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 3 (2010), 300339.
[47] Xiao Y., Zeng T., Yu J. and Ng M., Restoration of images corrupted by mixed Gaussian-impulse noise via l 1-l 0 minimization, Pattern Recognition, 44 (2011), 17081728.
[48] Zhang B., Fadili J. and Starck J., Wavelets, ridgelets and curvelets for Poisson noise removal, IEEE Trans. Image Process., 17 (2008), 10931108.
[49] Zhao X., Wang F. and Ng M., A new convex optimization model formultiplicative noise and blur removal, SIAM J. Imaging Sci., 7 (2014), 456475.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Communications in Computational Physics
  • ISSN: 1815-2406
  • EISSN: 1991-7120
  • URL: /core/journals/communications-in-computational-physics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 32 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 92 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 6th July 2017 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.