Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:41:12.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Tailored Finite Point Method for Solving Steady MHD Duct Flow Problems with Boundary Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2015

Po-Wen Hsieh*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 32001, Taiwan
Yintzer Shih*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
Suh-Yuh Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, National Central University, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County 32001, Taiwan
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we propose a development of the finite difference method, called the tailored finite point method, for solving steady magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) duct flow problems with a high Hartmann number. When the Hartmann number is large, the MHD duct flow is convection-dominated and thus its solution may exhibit localized phenomena such as the boundary layer. Most conventional numerical methods can not efficiently solve the layer problem because they are lacking in either stability or accuracy. However, the proposed tailored finite point method is capable of resolving high gradients near the layer regions without refining the mesh. Firstly, we devise the tailored finite point method for the scalar inhomogeneous convection-diffusion problem, and then extend it to the MHD duct flow which consists of a coupled system of convection-diffusion equations. For each interior grid point of a given rectangular mesh, we construct a finite-point difference operator at that point with some nearby grid points, where the coefficients of the difference operator are tailored to some particular properties of the problem. Numerical examples are provided to show the high performance of the proposed method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1]Brezzi, F. and Russo, A., Choosing bubbles for advection-diffusion problems, Math. Mod. Meth. Appl. Sci., 4 (1994), 571–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Franca, L. P., Frey, S. L. and Hughes, T. J. R., Stabilized finite element methods: I. application to the advective-diffusive model, Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Engrg., 95 (1992), 253–276.Google Scholar
[3]Franca, L. P., Hauke, G. and Masud, A., Revisiting stabilized finite element methods for the advective-diffusive equation, Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Engrg., 195 (2006), 1560–1572.Google Scholar
[4]Han, H. and Huang, Z., Tailored finite point method for steady-state reaction-diffusion equation, Comm. Math. Sci., 8 (2010), 887–899.Google Scholar
[5]Han, H. and Huang, Z., Tailored finite point method for a singular perturbation problem with variable coefficients in two dimensions, J. Sci. Comput., 41 (2009), 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Han, H., Huang, Z. and Kellogg, R. B., A tailored finite point method for a singular perturbation problem on an unbounded domain, J. Sci. Comput., 36 (2008), 243–261.Google Scholar
[7]Han, H., Huang, Z. and Kellogg, R. B., The tailored finite point method and a problem of P. Hemker, Proceedings of the International Conference on Boundary and Interior Layers–Computaional and Asymptotic Methods, University of Limerick, Ireland, July 28-August 1, 2008.Google Scholar
[8]Hsieh, P.-W. and Yang, S.-Y., A bubble-stabilized least-squares finite element method for steady MHD duct flow problems at high Hartmann numbers, J. Comput. Phys., 228 (2009), 8301–8320.Google Scholar
[9]Huang, Z., Tailored finite point method for the interface problem, Netw. Heterog. Media., 4 (2009), 91–106.Google Scholar
[10]Morton, K. W., Numerical Solution of Convection-Diffusion Problems, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
[11]Morton, K. W. and Mayers, D. F., Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.Google Scholar
[12]Nesliturk, A. I. and Tezer-Sezgin, M., The finite element method for MHD flow at high Hartmann numbers, Comput. Method. Appl. Mech. Engrg., 194 (2005), 1201–1224.Google Scholar
[13]Nesliturk, A. I. and Tezer-Sezgin, M., Finite element method solution of electrically driven magnetohydrodynamic flow, J. Comp. Appl. Math., 192 (2006), 339–352.Google Scholar
[14]Scandiuzzi, R. and Schrefler, B. A., FEM in steady MHD duct flow problems, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 30 (1990), 647–659.Google Scholar
[15]Shih, Y.-T., Kellogg, R. B. and Tsai, P.-S., A tailored finite point method for convection-diffusion-reaction problems, J. Sci. Comput., 43 (2010), 239–260.Google Scholar
[16]Singh, B. and Lal, J., Magnetohydrodynamic axial flow in a triangular pipe under transverse magnetic field, Indian J. Pure. Appl. Math., 9 (1978), 101–115.Google Scholar
[17]Singh, B. and Lal, J., FEM in MHD channel flow problems, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng., 18 (1982), 1104–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Singh, B. and Lal, J., FEM for unsteady MHD flow through pipes with arbitrary wall conductivity, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids., 4 (1984), 291–302.Google Scholar