Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-j6k2s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-06T08:48:58.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

(Mis)arguing Diversity

The Weakness of Diversity as a Civic Argument (and How to Make It Stronger)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Jose Marichal*
Affiliation:
California Lutheran University

Abstract

In this article, I use Boltanski and Thévenot's (2006) work on “logics of justification” to make the case that diversity, defined broadly as engagement with otherness, has limited worth as a “civic argument” in the United States. I argue that “diversity talk” has not been effective in civic spheres because it does not challenge the underlying pluralist architecture of the US political system. Instead, diversity in the civic sphere is regarded as producing conflict or an apolitical “improvement in manners” (Rorty 1999) rather than as a mechanism for citizenship development. This diminishes the ability for diversity to enhance democratic citizenship by fostering the development of a type of civic wisdom necessary for effective decision making in a democratic society.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Democratic Theory 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alesina, Alberto, and Eliana, La Ferrara. 2002. “Who Trusts Others?Journal of Public Economics 85 (2): 207234.10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00084-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Eliana, La Ferrara. 2005. “Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance.Journal of Economic Literature 43 (3): 762800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey, and Philip, Smith. 2005. “Introduction: The New Durkheim.” Pp. 137 in The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, eds. Alexander, Jeffrey and Smith, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CCOL9780521806725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Danielle. 2004. Talking to Strangers: Anxieties of Citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir, Yehuda. 1976. “The Role of Intergroup Contact in Change of Prejudice and Ethnic Relations.” Pp. 245308 in Towards the Elimination of Racism, ed. Katz, Phyllis A, Oxford: Pergamon Press. 10.1016/B978-0-08-018316-9.50016-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibugi, Daniele. 2008. The Global Commonwealth of Citizens: Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle. 2011 [350 bce]. Nichomachean Ethics. Translated by Bartlett, Robert and Collins, Susan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin. 1985. Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra, Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139198752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1958. Two Concepts of Liberty: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered Before the University of Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, and Henry, Hardy. 1998. The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bickford, Susan. 1996. The Dissonance of Democracy: Listening, Conflict, and Citizenship. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Mia, Tuan. 2006. Prejudice in Politics: Group Position, Public Opinion, and the Wisconsin Treaty Rights Dispute. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent, Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400827145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 2006. Racism Without Racists: Color-Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. “The Genesis of the Concepts of Habitus and Field.Sociocriticism 2 (2): 1124.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “Structures, Habitus, Practices.” Pp. 95110 in The Polity Reader in Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2007. Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Camus, Albert. 1951. L’homme révolté [The Rebel]. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Stokely, and Charles, Hamilton. 1967. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Carnevale, Mary Lu. 2009. “Sotomayor, Weighing Her Words.” Wall Street Journal Washington Wire blog. 15 July. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2009/07/15/sotomayor-weighing-her-words/ (accessed 9 October 2010).Google Scholar
Cohen, Cathy. 1999. The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226190518.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, Dora, and Matthew, Kahn. 2003. “Civic Engagement and Community Heterogeneity: An Economist's Perspective.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (1): 103111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 1994. Behind the Mule. Reprint ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Souza, Briggs, Xavier. “‘Some of My Best Friends Are’: Interracial Friendships, Class, and Segregation in America.” City & Community 6 (4): 263290, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6040.2007.00228.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, Stuart, and Hubert, Dreyfus. 1980. “A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition.Berkeley Operations Research Center.10.21236/ADA084551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubilet, Alex. 2004. “Rainbow Tassel Not Shown on Brochure.” The Daily Pennsylvanian, 27 May.Google Scholar
Florida, Richard. 2005. Cities and the Creative Class. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203997673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Ross, and Robert, Axelrod. 2006. “The Evolution of Ethnocentrism.Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (6): 926936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2004. The Politics of Disgust: The Public Identity of the Welfare Queen. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hancock, Ange-Marie. 2007. “Intersectionality as a Normative and Empirical Paradigm.Politics & Gender 3 (2): 248254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hero, Rodney E. 2004. “Social Capital and Racial Inequality in America.” Perspectives on Politics 1 (1): 113122.10.1017/S1537592703000094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie. 2001. “From Social to Political Identity: A Critical Examination of Social Identity Theory.Political Psychology 22 (1): 127156.10.1111/0162-895X.00230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judis, John, and Ruy, Texiera. 2005. The Emerging Democratic Majority. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Karen. 2003. “Cracks in the Rainbow: Group Commonality as a Basis for Latino and African-American Political Coalitions.Political Research Quarterly 56 (2): 199210.10.1177/106591290305600208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeter, Scott. 2008. “The Aging of the Boomers and the Rise of the Millennials.” Pp. 225258 in Red, Blue and Purple America: The Future of Election Demo-graphics, ed. Teixeira, Ruy. Washington DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène. 2012. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Mumford Center. 2001. “Ethnic Diversity Grows, Neighborhood Integration is at a Standstill.” http://mumford1.dyndns.org/cen2000/WholePop/WPreport/MumfordReport.pdf (accessed 5 October 2010).Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 2003. Diversity and Distrust: Civic Education in a Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marschall, Melissa J., and Dietlind, Stolle. 2004. “Race and the City: Neighborhood Context and the Development of Generalized Trust.Political Behavior 26 (2): 125153.10.1023/B:POBE.0000035960.73204.64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClain, Paula D., and Stephanie, C. Tauber. 1998. “Black and Latino Socioeconomic and Political Competition: Has a Decade Made a Difference?American Politics Research 26 (2): 237252.10.1177/1532673X9802600206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, Zachary P., and Jennifer, Watling Neal. 2013. “The (In)compatibility of Diversity and Sense of Community.American Journal of Community Psychology 53 (1–2): 112.10.1007/s10464-013-9608-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 2004. Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ober, Josiah. 2008. Democracy and Knowledge: Innovation and Learning in Classical Athens. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400828807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padilla, Felix. 1985. Latino Ethnic Consciousness: The Case of Mexican Americans and Puerto Ricans in Chicago. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Page, Scott. 2008. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400830282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Susan, and Maria, Puente. 2005. “Poll Shows Racial Divide on Storm Response.USA Today, 12 September. http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-09-12-katrina-poll_x.htm (accessed 19 September 2010).Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century.Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 137174.10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez-Sanchez, Saudiel. 2007. “A Social Relational Approach to the Conservation and Management of Fisheries: The Rural Communities of the Loreto Bay National Marine Park, BCS, Mexico.” PhD dissertation, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1999. Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Soroka, Stuart N., Richard, Johnston, and Keith, Banting. 2005. “Ethnicity, Ethnic Diversity, Networks, and Trust.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association, University of Western Ontario 2–4 June.Google Scholar
Stolle, Dietlind, Stuart Soroka, and Richard, Johnston. 2008. “When Does Diversity Erode Trust? Neighborhood Diversity, Interpersonal Trust and the Mediating Effect of Social Interactions.” Political Studies 56 (1): 5775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri, and John, C. Turner. 2004. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” Pp. 276293 in Political Psychology: Key Readings, ed. Jost, John T. and Sidanius, Jim. New York: Psychology Press. 10.4324/9780203505984-16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, and John, Hibbing. 2005. “Citizenship and Civic Engagement.Annual Review of Political Science 8 (1): 227249.10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. 10.2307/j.ctvpj75nhCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Will. n.d.For Your Conjectural Pleasure.” The Fly Bottle blog. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/05/04/disparate-trends-in-permissiveness-homosexuality-and-prostitution/ (accessed 8 October 2010).Google Scholar
Wood, Phil, and Charles, Landry. 2008. The Intercultural City: Planning for Diversity Advantage. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar