Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:26:40.939Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of environmental setting on mobility methods of children with cerebral palsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 January 2003

Robert J Palisano ,
Beth L Tieman ,
Stephen D Walter ,
Doreen J Bartlett ,
Peter L Rosenbaum ,
Diane Russell  and
Steven E Hanna
Robert J Palisano
Affiliation:
Programs in Rehabilitation Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Beth L Tieman
Affiliation:
Programs in Rehabilitation Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Stephen D Walter
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Doreen J Bartlett
Affiliation:
School of Physical Therapy, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.
Peter L Rosenbaum
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Diane Russell
Affiliation:
School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Steven E Hanna
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to: (1) describe the usual mobility methods of children with cerebral palsy (CP) at home, school, and outdoors or in the community and (2) examine whether children with CP are more dependent on adult assistance for mobility in certain settings. The participants were a stratified random sample of 636 children with CP (355 males and 281 females; 2 to 12 years of age, mean 6.8 years SD 2.7), receiving rehabilitation services in Ontario, Canada. Children were grouped by age and Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level. Among the five levels of the GMFCS, there were 185 children classified at level I, 81 children at level II, 113 children at level III, 132 children at level IV, and 125 children at level V. Information on children's usual mobility was obtained by parent report. The results of logistic regression indicated that compared with the school setting, children were more dependent on adult assistance for mobility when outdoors/in the community and less dependent at home. The majority of children aged from 4 to 12 years at levels III to V used wheelchair mobility at school and outdoors or in the community, however, only a small percentage self-propelled their wheelchair or used powered mobility. Of the children aged 4 to 12 years at level V, 39% were carried at home. The findings suggest that environmental setting is an important consideration for assessment and intervention to improve mobility of children with CP. For children who do not walk, attention should be given to the needs of caregivers and factors that are important for successful powered mobility.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , February 2003 , pp. 113 - 120
Copyright
© 2003 Mac Keith Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)