Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Scepticisme, fidéisme et évidentialisme : oppositions et origines

  • Artūrs Logins (a1)

I maintain that among the main views concerning the central questions of epistemology (in particular, the question of justified belief) are evidentialism, (Pyrrhonian) scepticism and fideism. In this paper, I first present the arguments in favour of a form of evidentialism, according to which no false belief can be epistemically justified on the basis of evidence. Second, I consider the historical emergence of evidentialism during the period of the early Enlightenment. In particular, I explore the disagreement between Pierre Bayle and Jean-Pierre de Crousaz, which demonstrates the emergence of the modern opposition between evidentialism and fideism.

Les principales attitudes adoptées devant les questions centrales de l’épistémologie générale (en particulier la question de la croyance justifiée) sont selon nous l’évidentialisme, le scepticisme (pyrrhonien) et le fidéisme. Dans cet article, nous présentons d’une part les arguments permettant d’accepter une forme de l’évidentialisme selon laquelle aucune croyance fausse ne peut être justifiée sur la base de raisons probantes. D’autre part, nous proposons de considérer l’aspect historique de l’émergence de l’évidentialisme au début des Lumières. Nous explorons un cas particulier qui témoigne de l’émergence de l’évidentialisme moderne comme opposition au fidéisme. Il s’agit de l’opposition entre Pierre Bayle et Jean-Pierre de Crousaz.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Julia Annas et Jonathan Barnes 1985 The Modes of Scepticism: Ancient Texts and Modern Interpretations, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Alan Bailey 2002 Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

David Bates 1996 «The Epistemology of Error in Late Enlightenment France», Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 29, no 3, p. 307327.

Richard Bett 2010 The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

John Bishop 2007 Believing by Faith: An Essay in the Epistemology and Ethics of Religious Belief, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Juan Comesaña 2010 «Evidentialist Reliabilism», Nous, vol. 44, no 4, p. 571600.

Earl Conee 1988 «The Basic Nature of Epistemic Justification», The Monist, vol. 71, no 3, p. 389404.

Earl Conee et Richard Feldman 2004 Evidentialism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Keith DeRose 1992 «Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions», Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 52, no 4, p. 913929.

Keith DeRose 1996 «Knowledge, Assertion and Lotteries», Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 74, no 4, p. 568580.

Jeremy Fantl et Matthew McGrath 2009 Knowledge in an Uncertain World, Oxford/New York (NY), Oxford University Press.

Gail Fine 2000 «Descartes and Ancient Skepticism: Reheated Cabbage?», The Philosophical Review, vol. 109, no 2, p. 195234.

Carolyn Iltis 1973 «The Decline of Cartesianism in Mechanics: The Leibnizian-Cartesian Debates», Isis, vol. 64, no 3, p. 356373.

Thomas Kelly 2008b «Evidence: Fundamental Concepts and the Phenomenal Conception», Philosophy Compass, vol. 3, no 5, p. 933955.

Kenneth, P Winkler . 2004 «Berkeley, Pyrrhonism, and the Theaetetus», dans Walter Sinnott-Armstrong , dir., Pyrrhonian Skepticism, Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 4067.

D. Anthony Larivière et Thomas M. Lennon 2002 «True Believers: the Reception of Descartes’s Meditations by Malebranche and Huet», Kriterion, vol. 43, no 106, p. 89107.

John Christian Laursen et Richard H. Popkin 1998 «Sources of Knowledge of Sextus Empiricus in Kant’s time: A French Translation of Sextus Empiricus from the Prussian Academy, 1779», British Journal for the History of Philosophy, vol. 6, no 2, p. 261267.

Thomas M Lennon . 2002a «Did Bayle Read Saint-Evremond?», Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 63, no 2, p. 225237.

Thomas M Lennon . 2002b «What Kind of a Skeptic Was Bayle?», Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 26, no 1, p. 258279.

Stephen Menn 1998 Descartes and Augustine, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

J. R Milton . 1987 «Induction Before Hume», The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 38, no 1, p. 4974.

José Neto Raimundo Maia , Gianni Paganini et John Christian Laursen , dir. 2009 Skepticism in the Modern Age: Building on the Work of Richard Popkin, Leiden/Boston, Brill.

Casey Perin 2008 «Descartes and the Legacy of Ancient Skepticism», dans Janet Broughton et John Carriero , dir., A Companion to Descartes, Oxford, Blackwell, p. 5265.

Dominik Perler 2004 «Was There a Pyrrhonian Crisis in Early Modern Philosophy? A Critical Notice of Richard H. Popkin», Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, vol. 86, no 2, p. 209220.

Richard H Popkin . 1996 «Prophecy and Scepticism in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth century», British Journal for the History of Philosophy, vol. 4, no 1, p. 120.

Richard H Popkin . et Arjo J. Vanderjagt , dir. 1993 Scepticism and Irreligion in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, Leiden/New York, Brill.

Patrick Rysiew 2005 «Reidian Evidence», Journal of Scottish Philosophy, vol. 3, no 2, p. 107121.

Bruce Silver 2002 «Montaigne, An Apology for Raymond Sebond: Happiness and the Poverty of Reason», Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 26, no 1, p. 94110.

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong 2004 Pyrrhonian Skepticism, Oxford/New York (NY), Oxford University Press.

Ernerst Sosa 1980 «The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge», Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 5, no 1, p. 326.

Barry Stroud 1984 The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

William Sweet 1999 «Paley, Whately, and “Enlightenment Evidentialism”», International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, vol. 45, no 3, p. 143166.

L Thielemann . 1957 «[Review of] Jean-Pierre de Crousaz (1663-1750) et le conflit des idées au siècle des Lumières. By Jacqueline E. de La Harpe [...]», Comparative Literature, vol. 9, no 1, p. 8486.

Henri G van Leeuwen . 1970 The Problem of Certainty in English Thought, 1630-1690, La Haye, Martinus Nijhoff.

Allen Wood 2007 «The Duty to Believe According to the Evidence», International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, vol. 63, nos 1-3, p. 724.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 7 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 125 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.