Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Foss, Jeff 2009. The Scientific Explanation of Colour Qualia. Dialogue, Vol. 48, Issue. 03, p. 479.

    Nagasawa, Yujin 2003. Thomas vs. Thomas: A New Approach to Nagel's Bat Argument. Inquiry, Vol. 46, Issue. 3, p. 377.


Subjectivity, Objectivity and Nagel on Consciousness

  • Jeffrey Foss (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 April 2010

The strong intuition that the facts concerning the subjectivity of consciousness are simply beyond the grasp of objective science is the highest barrier to an intuitively convincing materialism in the philosophy of mind. We are steeped in a tradition which has it that there is, to state it from the first-person point of view, an epistemic difference in principle between my introspectible experience, which only I can apprehend and know, and the things which everyone can apprehend and which form the domain of the natural sciences. This contrast is sometimes cast as that between the subjective stuff of first-person introspectible consciousness and the objective stuff of the natural sciences. In this essay, I will try to budge the view of the subjective-objective distinction which underlies this tradition from its position as tacit dogma.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Jeff Foss 1989On the Logic of What It Is Like to Be a Conscious Subject.Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 67, 2 (June): 205–20.

Frank Jackson 1982Epiphenomenal Qualia.Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 127 (April): 127–36.

Joseph Margolis 1984 Culture and Cultural Entities: Toward a New Unity of Science. Boston: D. Reidel.

Thomas Nagel 1974What Is It Like to Be A Bat?Philosophical Review, 83, 4 (October): 435–50. Reprinted in Nagel (1979).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie
  • ISSN: 0012-2173
  • EISSN: 1759-0949
  • URL: /core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *